Abstract
Background Multi-site studies facilitate the study of rare outcomes or exposures through integrating patient information from several distinct care sites. Due to patient privacy concerns, sharing of patient-level information among collaborating sites is often prohibited, suggesting a need for privacy-preserving data analysis methods. Several such methods exist, but have been shown to sometimes result in biased estimation or require extensive communication among sites.
Objective We present a communication-efficient, privacy-preserving method for performing distributed regression on Electronic Health Records (EHR) data across multiple sites for zero-inflated count outcomes. Our approach is motivated by two real-world data problems: modeling frequency of serious adverse events and examining risk factors associated with pediatric avoidable hospitalization.
Methods We use hurdle regression, a two-part (logistic-Poisson) regression model, to characterize the effects of risk factors on zero-inflated count outcomes. Further, we develop a one-shot algorithm for performing hurdle regression (ODAH) across multiple sites, using individual patient data at one site and aggregated data from all other sites to approximate the complete data log likelihood. We evaluate ODAH through extensive simulations and an application to EHR data from the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) and the OneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium. We compare ODAH estimates to those from meta-analysis and pooled analysis (the gold standard in which all patient data are pooled together).
Results In simulations, ODAH estimates exhibited bias relative to the gold standard of less than 0.1% across several settings. In contrast, meta-analysis estimated exhibited relative bias up to 12.7%, largely dependent on the event rate. When applying ODAH to CHOP data, relative biases for estimates in both components of the hurdle model were less than 5.1%, while meta-analysis estimates exhibited relative bias as high as 63.6%. When analyzing OneFlorida data, ODAH relative biases were less than 10% for eight of the ten log relative risks estimated, while meta-analysis estimates again showed substantially greater bias.
Conclusions Our simulations and real-world applications suggest ODAH is a promising method for performing privacy-preserving distributed learning on EHR data when modeling zero-inflated count outcomes.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work is support in part by National Institutes of Health Grants 1R01LM012607 (ME, CL, RD and YC) and 1R01AI130460 (ME, CL, RD and YC). Children's Hospital of Philadelphia: This work was supported by a grant from the Commonwealth Universal Research Enhancement (C.U.R.E) program funded by the Pennsylvania Department of Health - 2015 Formula award - SAP #4100072543. OneFlorida: The work at the University of Florida (UF) site is supported in part by the Cancer Informatics Shared Resource at the UF Health Cancer Center, and NIH grants R21AG061431 and R01CA246418.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia: CHOP designated the study Not Human Subjects Research. OneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium: The use of OneFlorida data in this study was reviewed and approved by the University of Florida IRB under IRB202003137.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia: The data are not available for deposit into a repository. CHOP can make aggregate results available on request. OneFlorida: OneFlorida data can be requested at https://onefloridaconsortium.org/front-door/; Since OneFlorida data is a HIPAA limited data set, a data use agreement needs to be established with the OneFlorida network.
Abbreviations
- EHR
- electronic health record
- ODAH
- One-shot Distributed Algorithm for performing Hurdle regression
- CHOP
- Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia
- DDN
- distributed data network
- OHDSI
- Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics
- PHI
- protected health information
- AH
- avoidable hospitalization
- OR
- odds ratio
- RR
- relative risk