Abstract
Rationale Impulsivity and inefficient self-regulation are major deficits in substance use disorder, corresponding to lack of treatment response and low abstinence rates. Prefrontal cortex (PFC) executive functions, such as working memory (WM), enable self-regulation of impulsivity by keeping in mind cognitive strategies for optimal decisions about future action. Training WM may improve self-regulation of impulsivity in various populations, including methamphetamine use disorder (MUD) patients. However, many controversies exist regarding the efficacy of WM training (e.g. near-versus far-transfer effects) and associated improvements to clinical outcomes. Such controversies may relate, as observed in our preliminary study in MUD patients, to variation in WM training engagement.
Methods In this nested examination of n=17 male MUD patient data (age range 20-39 years) from a previously published study, the primary aim was to identify variables that may predict a WM training engagement index (EI), and secondarily to determine if EI could predict clinical improvement in MUD patients. The EI consisted of three domains of WM training: motivation, attention/learning and achievement, and we examined the link between self-report measures of impulsivity, self-regulation, anxiety/depression and executive function and EI.
Results Those with higher rates of attention/learning demonstrated greater improvement in attentional impulsivity, and those with higher rates of achievement had a significant improvement in self-reported anxiety, as well as slower time to complete an executive function task after treatment.
Discussion We suggest the EI is a useful measure to detect level of engagement during WM training in patients with MUD and is predictive of clinical improvements.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
SJB salary was funded by the National Institute of Health (NIH), National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA): Ref: R21DA040492; EFS was funded by the University of Cape Town Clinical Scientists Scholarship
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The University of Cape Town (UCT) Human Research Ethics Committee approved the main study[7,19], this is a nested examination of the previous data (Ref: HREC: 554/2012).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
List of abbreviations
- BIS
- Barratt Impulsiveness Scale
- CT
- cognitive training
- EI
- Engagement Index
- HADSa
- Hospital and Anxiety and Depression Scale (anxiety)
- HADSd
- Hospital and Anxiety and Depression Scale (depression)
- MUD
- Methamphetamine Use Disorder
- SRQ
- Self Regulation Questionnaire
- SUD
- Substance Use Disorder
- TAU
- treatment as usual
- TMT
- Trail Making Test
- WM
- working memory
- WMT
- working memory training
