Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Personalization improves the biomechanical efficacy of foot progression angle modifications in individuals with medial knee osteoarthritis

Scott D Uhlrich, Julie A Kolesar, Łukasz Kidziński, Melissa A Boswell, Amy Silder, Garry E Gold, Scott L Delp, Gary S Beaupre
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.15.20248220
Scott D Uhlrich
1Departments of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
2Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
5Musculoskeletal Research Laboratory, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA 94304
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: suhlrich@stanford.edu
Julie A Kolesar
2Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
5Musculoskeletal Research Laboratory, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA 94304
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Łukasz Kidziński
2Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melissa A Boswell
2Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amy Silder
2Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
5Musculoskeletal Research Laboratory, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA 94304
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Garry E Gold
2Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
3Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
4Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott L Delp
1Departments of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
2Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
4Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gary S Beaupre
2Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
5Musculoskeletal Research Laboratory, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA 94304
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objectives The goal of this study was to evaluate the importance of personalization when selecting foot progression angle modifications that aim to reduce the peak knee adduction moment in individuals with medial knee osteoarthritis.

Design One hundred seven individuals with medial knee osteoarthritis walked on an instrumented treadmill with biofeedback instructing them to toe-in and toe-out by 5° and 10° relative to their self-selected foot progression angle. We selected individuals’ personalized foot progression angle as the modification that maximally reduced their larger knee adduction moment peak. Additionally, we used lasso regression to identify which secondary changes in kinematics made a 10° toe-in gait modification more effective at reducing the first knee adduction moment peak.

Results Sixty-six percent of individuals reduced their larger knee adduction moment peak by at least 5% with a personalized foot progression angle modification, which is more than (p<0.001) the 54% and 23% of individuals who reduced it with a uniformly-assigned 10° toe-in or toe-out modification, respectively. When toeing-in, greater reductions in the first knee adduction moment peak were related to an increased frontal-plane tibia angle (knee more medial than ankle), a more valgus knee abduction angle, reduced contralateral pelvic drop, and a more medialized center of pressure in the foot reference frame.

Conclusions Personalization increases the proportion of individuals with medial knee osteoarthritis who may benefit from modification of their foot progression angle.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

Study associated with clinicaltrials.gov NCT02767570

Funding Statement

SDU and MAB were funded by fellowships from the National Science Foundation (DGE-114747, DGE-1656518) and the Stanford Office of the Vice Provost for Graduate Education. This work was also supported by grant P41 EB027060 from the National Institutes of Health and by Merit Review award I01 RX001811 from the United States Department of Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation Research and Development Service. The contents of this work do not represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government. The funding sources did not play a role in study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data; writing of the manuscript; nor the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The Stanford University Institutional Review Board approved research protocol and informed consent documents.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The dataset and lasso regression code are available at: https://github.com/suhlrich/ToeInKAMReduction.

https://github.com/suhlrich/ToeInKAMReduction

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 17, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Personalization improves the biomechanical efficacy of foot progression angle modifications in individuals with medial knee osteoarthritis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Personalization improves the biomechanical efficacy of foot progression angle modifications in individuals with medial knee osteoarthritis
Scott D Uhlrich, Julie A Kolesar, Łukasz Kidziński, Melissa A Boswell, Amy Silder, Garry E Gold, Scott L Delp, Gary S Beaupre
medRxiv 2020.12.15.20248220; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.15.20248220
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Personalization improves the biomechanical efficacy of foot progression angle modifications in individuals with medial knee osteoarthritis
Scott D Uhlrich, Julie A Kolesar, Łukasz Kidziński, Melissa A Boswell, Amy Silder, Garry E Gold, Scott L Delp, Gary S Beaupre
medRxiv 2020.12.15.20248220; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.15.20248220

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Orthopedics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (215)
  • Allergy and Immunology (495)
  • Anesthesia (106)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1095)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (196)
  • Dermatology (141)
  • Emergency Medicine (274)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (500)
  • Epidemiology (9765)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (480)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2308)
  • Geriatric Medicine (222)
  • Health Economics (462)
  • Health Informatics (1557)
  • Health Policy (734)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (603)
  • Hematology (236)
  • HIV/AIDS (503)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11638)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (617)
  • Medical Education (237)
  • Medical Ethics (67)
  • Nephrology (257)
  • Neurology (2141)
  • Nursing (134)
  • Nutrition (336)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (426)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (517)
  • Oncology (1175)
  • Ophthalmology (364)
  • Orthopedics (128)
  • Otolaryngology (220)
  • Pain Medicine (146)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (311)
  • Pediatrics (695)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (300)
  • Primary Care Research (267)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2180)
  • Public and Global Health (4654)
  • Radiology and Imaging (776)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (457)
  • Respiratory Medicine (623)
  • Rheumatology (274)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (225)
  • Sports Medicine (210)
  • Surgery (251)
  • Toxicology (43)
  • Transplantation (120)
  • Urology (94)