Abstract
Objective India is a double world capital for early life undernutrition and type 2 diabetes. We aimed to characterise lifecourse growth and metabolic trajectories in those developing glucose intolerance as young adults, in the Pune Maternal Nutrition Study (PMNS).
Research design and Methods PMNS is a community-based intergenerational birth cohort established in 1993, with serial information on parents and children through pregnancy, childhood and adolescence. We compared normal glucose tolerant and glucose intolerant participants for serial growth, estimates of insulin sensitivity and secretion (HOMA and dynamic indices) and beta cell compensation accounting for prevailing insulin sensitivity (disposition index).
Results At 18 years (N=619) 37% men and 20% women were glucose intolerant (184 prediabetes, 1 diabetes) despite 48% being underweight (BMI<18.5 kg/m2). Glucose intolerant participants had higher fasting glucose from childhood. Mothers of glucose intolerant participants had higher glycemia in pregnancy. Glucose intolerant participants were shorter at birth. Insulin sensitivity decreased with age in all participants, and the glucose intolerant had consistently lower compensatory insulin secretion from childhood. Participants in the highest quintile of fasting glucose at 6 and 12 years had a 2.5- and 4.0-fold higher risk respectively of 18-year glucose intolerance; this finding was replicated in two other cohorts.
Conclusion Inadequate compensatory insulin secretory response to increasing insulin insensitivity from early life is the major pathophysiology underlying glucose intolerance in thin rural Indians. Smaller birth size, maternal pregnancy hyperglycemia, and higher glycemia in childhood herald future glucose intolerance, mandating a strategy for diabetes prevention from early life, preferably intergenerationally.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The PMNS and the PCS were funded by the Wellcome Trust, UK (038128/Z/93, 059609/Z/99, 079877/Z/06/Z, 098575/B/12/Z and 083460/Z/07/Z), MRC, UK (MR/J000094/1) and Department of Biotechnology, GoI (BT/PR-6870/PID/20/268/2005). The funding agencies had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing or decision to submit the article.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
KEM Hospital Research Centre Ethics Committee has provided permission for the PMNS, Extended PMNS and PCS.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Changes have been made in methods and discussion for clarity, 1 new figure (figure 2),
Data Availability
Data is available with Prof C S Yajnik for sharing to confirm our findings and for additional analyses by applying to the corresponding author with a 200 word plan of analysis. Data sharing is subject to KEMHRC Ethics Committee approval and Government of India Health Ministry advisory committee permission.
