Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Evaluation of two RT-PCR techniques for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection in serum for microbiological diagnosis

Alexandra Martín Ramírez, Nelly Daniela Zurita Cruz, Ainhoa Gutiérrez-Cobos, Diego Aníbal Rodríguez Serrano, Isidoro González Álvaro, Emilia Roy Vallejo, Sara Gómez de Frutos, Leticia Fontán García-Rodrigo, Laura Cardeñoso Domingo
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.15.20231795
Alexandra Martín Ramírez
1Clinical Microbiology Departament. Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nelly Daniela Zurita Cruz
1Clinical Microbiology Departament. Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ainhoa Gutiérrez-Cobos
1Clinical Microbiology Departament. Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ainhoa.gutierrez@salud.madrid.org ainhoagutierrezcobos@gmail.com
Diego Aníbal Rodríguez Serrano
2Intesive Care Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Isidoro González Álvaro
3Reumatology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emilia Roy Vallejo
4Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sara Gómez de Frutos
1Clinical Microbiology Departament. Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leticia Fontán García-Rodrigo
1Clinical Microbiology Departament. Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laura Cardeñoso Domingo
1Clinical Microbiology Departament. Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in serum (viraemia) in COVID-19 patients has been related to poor prognosis and death.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of two commercial reverse real-time-PCR (rRT-PCR) kits, cobas® SARS-CoV-2 (Cobas® test) and TaqPath™ COVID-19 CE-IVD RT-PCR Kit (Taqpath™ test), to detect viraemia in COVID-19 patients and their implementation as routine diagnosis in microbiology laboratory.

This retrospective cohort study was conducted with 203 adult patients admitted to Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, (89 Intensive Care Unit and 114 ward) with at least one serum sample collected in the first 48 hours from admission. A total 265 serum samples were included for study.

Evaluation of both rRT-PCR techniques was performed comparing with the gold standard, a Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Nucleic Acid Diagnostic Kit; considering at least one target as a positive result.

Comparison of Cobas® test and Taqpath™ test with the gold standard method, showed high values of specificity (93.75 and 92.19 respectively) and Positive Predictive Value (92.92 and 99.88 respectively). Nevertheless, sensitivity (53.72 and 73.63 respectively) and Negative Predictive Value (32.53 and 42.99 respectively) were lower; Kappa values were 0.35 for cobas® test and 0.56 for Taqpath™ test.

For both techniques, differences of viraemia detection between the ICU and non-ICU patients were significant (p≤0.001).

Consequently, SARS-CoV-2 viraemia positive results obtained by both rRT-PCR should be considered good tools and may help in handling COVID-19 patients.

Moreover, these methods could be easily integrated in the routine laboratory COVID-19 diagnosis and may open new strategies based on an early COVID-19 treatment.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

This is a retrospective cohort study

Funding Statement

The authors did not receive any fundings to do the study.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The stydy was approved by the Hospital Universitario La Princesa independent ethics research committee (reference number 4267, acta CEIm 21/20)

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data referred in our manuscript are available to see for every one who wants to do it.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 16, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of two RT-PCR techniques for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection in serum for microbiological diagnosis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Evaluation of two RT-PCR techniques for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection in serum for microbiological diagnosis
Alexandra Martín Ramírez, Nelly Daniela Zurita Cruz, Ainhoa Gutiérrez-Cobos, Diego Aníbal Rodríguez Serrano, Isidoro González Álvaro, Emilia Roy Vallejo, Sara Gómez de Frutos, Leticia Fontán García-Rodrigo, Laura Cardeñoso Domingo
medRxiv 2020.11.15.20231795; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.15.20231795
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Evaluation of two RT-PCR techniques for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection in serum for microbiological diagnosis
Alexandra Martín Ramírez, Nelly Daniela Zurita Cruz, Ainhoa Gutiérrez-Cobos, Diego Aníbal Rodríguez Serrano, Isidoro González Álvaro, Emilia Roy Vallejo, Sara Gómez de Frutos, Leticia Fontán García-Rodrigo, Laura Cardeñoso Domingo
medRxiv 2020.11.15.20231795; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.15.20231795

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (76)
  • Allergy and Immunology (202)
  • Anesthesia (55)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (495)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (91)
  • Dermatology (57)
  • Emergency Medicine (170)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (218)
  • Epidemiology (5756)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (222)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (883)
  • Geriatric Medicine (89)
  • Health Economics (233)
  • Health Informatics (777)
  • Health Policy (400)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (258)
  • Hematology (105)
  • HIV/AIDS (188)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (6591)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (398)
  • Medical Education (119)
  • Medical Ethics (29)
  • Nephrology (94)
  • Neurology (859)
  • Nursing (46)
  • Nutrition (143)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (166)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (266)
  • Oncology (521)
  • Ophthalmology (168)
  • Orthopedics (44)
  • Otolaryngology (107)
  • Pain Medicine (48)
  • Palliative Medicine (22)
  • Pathology (150)
  • Pediatrics (258)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (147)
  • Primary Care Research (116)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (994)
  • Public and Global Health (2266)
  • Radiology and Imaging (380)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (175)
  • Respiratory Medicine (314)
  • Rheumatology (110)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (83)
  • Sports Medicine (83)
  • Surgery (118)
  • Toxicology (25)
  • Transplantation (35)
  • Urology (42)