Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Dynamic connectivity predicts acute motor impairment and recovery post-stroke

Anna K. Bonkhoff, Anne K. Rehme, Lukas Hensel, Caroline Tscherpel, Lukas J. Volz, Flor A. Espinoza, Harshvardhan Gazula, Victor M. Vergara, Gereon R. Fink, Vince D. Calhoun, Natalia S. Rost, Christian Grefkes
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.25.20200881
Anna K. Bonkhoff
1J. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
2Cognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Centre Juelich, Juelich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne K. Rehme
3Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lukas Hensel
3Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Caroline Tscherpel
2Cognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Centre Juelich, Juelich, Germany
3Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lukas J. Volz
3Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Flor A. Espinoza
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Harshvardhan Gazula
4Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
5Tri-institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Victor M. Vergara
5Tri-institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gereon R. Fink
2Cognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Centre Juelich, Juelich, Germany
3Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vince D. Calhoun
5Tri-institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Natalia S. Rost
1J. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christian Grefkes
2Cognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Centre Juelich, Juelich, Germany
3Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: christian.grefkes@uk-koeln.de
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objective Thorough assessment of cerebral dysfunction after acute brain lesions is paramount to optimize predicting short- and long-term clinical outcomes. The potential of dynamic resting-state connectivity for prognosticating motor recovery has not been explored so far.

Methods We built random forest classifier-based prediction models of acute upper limb motor impairment and recovery after stroke. Predictions were based on structural and resting-state fMRI data from 54 ischemic stroke patients scanned within the first days of symptom onset. Functional connectivity was estimated using both a static and dynamic approach. Individual motor performance was phenotyped in the acute phase and six months later.

Results A model based on the time spent in specific dynamic connectivity configurations achieved the best discrimination between patients with and without motor impairments (out-of-sample area under the curve and 95%-confidence interval (AUC±95%-CI): 0.67±0.01). In contrast, patients with moderate-to-severe impairments could be differentiated from patients with mild deficits using a model based on the variability of dynamic connectivity (AUC±95%-CI: 0.83±0.01). Here, the variability of the connectivity between ipsilesional sensorimotor cortex and putamen discriminated the most between patients. Finally, motor recovery was best predicted by the time spent in specific connectivity configurations (AUC±95%-CI: 0.89±0.01) in combination with the initial motor impairment. Here, better recovery was linked to a shorter time spent in a functionally integrated network configuration in the acute phase post-stroke.

Interpretation Dynamic connectivity-derived parameters constitute potent predictors of acute motor impairment and post-stroke recovery, which in the future might inform personalized therapy regimens to promote recovery from acute stroke.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

A.K.B. is supported by a travel stipend from the German Section of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (Deutsche Gesellschaft fuer Klinische Neurophysiologie und funktionelle Bildgebung (DGKN)). V.D.C. is supported in part by NIH grant #R01DA040487. N.S.R. is in part supported by NIH-NINDS (R01NS082285, R01NS086905, U19NS115388). G.R.F. gratefully acknowledges support by the Magda- and Walter Boll foundation.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

All aspects of this study were approved by the ethics committee of the University of Cologne (File No. 11-191), and all patients provided informed written consent following the Declaration of Helsinki.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

DFNC was computed based on Matlab2019a scripts available in the GIFT toolbox. Further statistical analyses were conducted in a jupyter notebook environment (Python 3.7, https://github.com/AnnaBonkhoff/to_be_ADDED_afterpublication).

  • Abbreviations

    AUC
    Area under curve
    dFNC
    dynamic functional network connectivity
    FDR
    false discovery rate
    MRI
    magnetic resonance imaging
    MI-UL
    motricity index of the upper limb
    rsfMRI
    resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted September 27, 2020.
    Download PDF
    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Dynamic connectivity predicts acute motor impairment and recovery post-stroke
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Dynamic connectivity predicts acute motor impairment and recovery post-stroke
    Anna K. Bonkhoff, Anne K. Rehme, Lukas Hensel, Caroline Tscherpel, Lukas J. Volz, Flor A. Espinoza, Harshvardhan Gazula, Victor M. Vergara, Gereon R. Fink, Vince D. Calhoun, Natalia S. Rost, Christian Grefkes
    medRxiv 2020.09.25.20200881; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.25.20200881
    Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Dynamic connectivity predicts acute motor impairment and recovery post-stroke
    Anna K. Bonkhoff, Anne K. Rehme, Lukas Hensel, Caroline Tscherpel, Lukas J. Volz, Flor A. Espinoza, Harshvardhan Gazula, Victor M. Vergara, Gereon R. Fink, Vince D. Calhoun, Natalia S. Rost, Christian Grefkes
    medRxiv 2020.09.25.20200881; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.25.20200881

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Neurology
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (216)
    • Allergy and Immunology (496)
    • Anesthesia (106)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (1110)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (196)
    • Dermatology (141)
    • Emergency Medicine (275)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (505)
    • Epidemiology (9796)
    • Forensic Medicine (5)
    • Gastroenterology (481)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2327)
    • Geriatric Medicine (223)
    • Health Economics (463)
    • Health Informatics (1567)
    • Health Policy (737)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (608)
    • Hematology (238)
    • HIV/AIDS (508)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11669)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (617)
    • Medical Education (240)
    • Medical Ethics (67)
    • Nephrology (258)
    • Neurology (2154)
    • Nursing (134)
    • Nutrition (340)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (427)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (519)
    • Oncology (1185)
    • Ophthalmology (366)
    • Orthopedics (129)
    • Otolaryngology (221)
    • Pain Medicine (148)
    • Palliative Medicine (50)
    • Pathology (314)
    • Pediatrics (699)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (303)
    • Primary Care Research (268)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2195)
    • Public and Global Health (4685)
    • Radiology and Imaging (786)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (458)
    • Respiratory Medicine (625)
    • Rheumatology (276)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (226)
    • Sports Medicine (212)
    • Surgery (252)
    • Toxicology (43)
    • Transplantation (120)
    • Urology (94)