ABSTRACT
Background Public health and research assessment of self-harm or suicide attempts must sometimes rely on health system records. Previous research regarding accuracy of encounter or billing diagnoses to identify self-harm or suicide attempt has yielded mixed results.
Methods Using data from a large pragmatic trial of outreach to prevent suicide attempt, investigators identified ICD-10-CM diagnostic codes in categories where suicide attempt or self-harm might be missed or misclassified: injuries and poisonings coded as having “undetermined intent, injuries and poisonings coded as accidental, and injuries with no coding of intent. For injury and poisoning events with these selected codes, relevant text was extracted from full-text electronic health records and rated by a blinded panel of investigators as indicating or not indicating self-harm
Results Diagnostic codes selected for review include 43 codes for injuries and poisonings with undetermined intent, 26 codes for accidental injuries and poisonings, and 46 codes for injuries without coding of intent. Among injury and poisoning events in this sample, full-text records were available for review for 60 coded as undetermined intent, 173 coded as accidents, and 288 with no coding of intent. After review of text, raters judged 46 (77%), 152 (88%), and 275 (95%) respectively as having adequate text documentation for confident rating of self-harm intent. Among those with adequate text for confident rating, the proportions of events classified as due to self-harm were 19% for injuries and poisonings coded as undetermined intent, 6% for injuries and poisonings coded as accidents, and 15% for injuries without coding of intent.
Conclusions In this sample of people at high risk for self-harm or suicide attempt, we low rates of misclassified self-harm events among injuries and poisonings coded as having undetermined intent, accidental intent, or no coding of intent. In this sample, inclusion of all misclassified events identified through this search process would increase the total number of self-harm events identified by approximately 10%.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
NCT02326883
Funding Statement
Supported by National Institute of Mental Health Cooperative Agreement UH3 MH007755.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
All trial procedures, including the chart review work described here, were reviewed and approved by institutional review boards at each of the four participating health systems (HealthPartners IRB, Kaiser Permanente Colorado IRB, Kaiser Permanente Northwest IRB, and Kaiser Permanente Washington IRB). All four IRBs approved a modified or abbreviated consent procedure for participation in the pragmatic trial and a waiver of consent for the use of records data described in this report.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Supported by National Institute of Mental Health Cooperative Agreement UH3 MH007755
Data Availability
We are not able to share clinical text from patient records.
