Abstract
Using genetics to predict the likelihood of future psychiatric disorders such as Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) poses scientific and ethical challenges. This report illustrates flaws in current machine learning (ML) approaches to such predictions using, as an example, a proposed genetic test for OUD derived from 16 candidate gene variants. In an independent sample of OUD cases and controls of European and African descent, results from five ML algorithms trained with purported “reward-system” candidate variants demonstrate that ML methods predict genomic ancestry rather than OUD. Further, sets of variants matched to the candidate SNPs by allele frequency produced similarly flawed predictions, questioning the plausibility of the selected candidate variants. We conclude that the genetic prediction of OUD (and by extension other highly polygenic psychiatric diseases) by ML has high potential to increase the likelihood of medical discrimination against population subgroups, with no benefit of accurate prediction for early intervention.
Competing Interest Statement
HRK is an advisory board member for Dicerna and a member of the American Society of Clinical Psychopharmacology's Alcohol Clinical Trials Initiative, which was supported in the last three years by AbbVie, Alkermes, Dicerna, Ethypharm, Indivior, Lilly, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Pfizer, Arbor, and Amygdala Neurosciences. HRK and JG are named as inventors on PCT patent application #15/878,640 entitled: "Genotype-guided dosing of opioid agonists," filed January 24, 2018.
Funding Statement
This research is supported by MH109532. ASH acknowledges support from DA007261; AA acknowledges support from K02DA032573. Yale-Penn (phs000425.v1.p1; phs000952.v1.p1) was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants RC2 DA028909, R01 DA12690, R01 DA12849, R01 DA18432, R01 AA11330, and R01 AA017535 and the Veterans Affairs Connecticut and Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Mental Illness Research, Educational, and Clinical Centers.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Yale and UPenn (site-specific) IRB
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Results from learning curves and ML scripts will be made available upon publication.