Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

The Common Interests of Health Protection and the Economy: Evidence from Scenario Calculations of COVID-19 Containment Policies

Florian Dorn, Sahamoddin Khailaie, Marc Stoeckli, Sebastian C. Binder, Berit Lange, Stefan Lautenbacher, Andreas Peichl, Patrizio Vanella, Timo Wollmershäuser, Clemens Fuest, Michael Meyer-Hermann
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.14.20175224
Florian Dorn
1ifo Institute – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sahamoddin Khailaie
2Department of Systems Immunology and Braunschweig Integrated Centre of Systems Biology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marc Stoeckli
1ifo Institute – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sebastian C. Binder
2Department of Systems Immunology and Braunschweig Integrated Centre of Systems Biology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Berit Lange
3Department of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Germany
4German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefan Lautenbacher
1ifo Institute – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andreas Peichl
1ifo Institute – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, Germany
6CESifo Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrizio Vanella
3Department of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Timo Wollmershäuser
1ifo Institute – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, Germany
6CESifo Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Clemens Fuest
1ifo Institute – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, Germany
6CESifo Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: fuest@ifo.de mmh@theoretical-biology.de
Michael Meyer-Hermann
2Department of Systems Immunology and Braunschweig Integrated Centre of Systems Biology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Germany
5Institute for Biochemistry, Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: fuest@ifo.de mmh@theoretical-biology.de
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Several countries use shutdown strategies to contain the spread of the COVID-19 epidemic, at the expense of massive economic costs. While this suggests a conflict between health protection and economic objectives, we examine whether the economically optimal exit strategy can be reconciled with the containment of the epidemic. We use a novel combination of epidemiological and economic simulations for scenario calculations based on empirical evidence from Germany. Our findings suggest that a prudent opening is economically optimal, whereas costs are higher for a more extensive opening process. This rejects the view that there is a conflict with health protection. Instead, it is in the common interest of public health and the economy to relax non-pharmaceutical interventions in a manner that keeps the epidemic under control.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

SB, MMH, BL and PV received funding from the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No 101003480. BL and PV were funded by the Initiative and Networking Fund of the Helmholtz Association. SB and MMH were supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research within the Rapid Response Module of the National Research Network on Zoonotic Infections, project CoViDec, FKZ: 01KI20102. SK was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research within the Measures for the Establishment of Systems Medicine, project SYSIMIT (BMBF eMed project SYSIMIT, FKZ: 01ZX1308B) and by the Helmholtz Association, Zukunftsthema Immunology and Inflammation (ZT-0027).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Not applicable

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Not applicable

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 16, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Common Interests of Health Protection and the Economy: Evidence from Scenario Calculations of COVID-19 Containment Policies
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The Common Interests of Health Protection and the Economy: Evidence from Scenario Calculations of COVID-19 Containment Policies
Florian Dorn, Sahamoddin Khailaie, Marc Stoeckli, Sebastian C. Binder, Berit Lange, Stefan Lautenbacher, Andreas Peichl, Patrizio Vanella, Timo Wollmershäuser, Clemens Fuest, Michael Meyer-Hermann
medRxiv 2020.08.14.20175224; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.14.20175224
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
The Common Interests of Health Protection and the Economy: Evidence from Scenario Calculations of COVID-19 Containment Policies
Florian Dorn, Sahamoddin Khailaie, Marc Stoeckli, Sebastian C. Binder, Berit Lange, Stefan Lautenbacher, Andreas Peichl, Patrizio Vanella, Timo Wollmershäuser, Clemens Fuest, Michael Meyer-Hermann
medRxiv 2020.08.14.20175224; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.14.20175224

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (216)
  • Allergy and Immunology (495)
  • Anesthesia (106)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1101)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (196)
  • Dermatology (141)
  • Emergency Medicine (274)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (502)
  • Epidemiology (9782)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (481)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2318)
  • Geriatric Medicine (223)
  • Health Economics (463)
  • Health Informatics (1563)
  • Health Policy (737)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (606)
  • Hematology (238)
  • HIV/AIDS (507)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11656)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (617)
  • Medical Education (240)
  • Medical Ethics (67)
  • Nephrology (258)
  • Neurology (2148)
  • Nursing (134)
  • Nutrition (338)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (427)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (518)
  • Oncology (1183)
  • Ophthalmology (366)
  • Orthopedics (129)
  • Otolaryngology (220)
  • Pain Medicine (148)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (313)
  • Pediatrics (698)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (302)
  • Primary Care Research (267)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2188)
  • Public and Global Health (4673)
  • Radiology and Imaging (781)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (457)
  • Respiratory Medicine (624)
  • Rheumatology (274)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (226)
  • Sports Medicine (210)
  • Surgery (252)
  • Toxicology (43)
  • Transplantation (120)
  • Urology (94)