Abstract
Introduction We evaluated anxiety and quality of life (QoL) in patients who were operated for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC)
Methods The present study is a prospective analysis of patients with histopathologically confirmed NMIBCs after they were submitted to transurethral resection of the tumour (TURBT). Eligible were all adult patients with a single or multiple NMIBCs. All included patients followed therapy with either BCG or Epirubicin instillations. The SF-36 questionnaire Physical and Mental health aspects were used for QoL assessment. Similarly, the STAI-Y was introduced for the state (STAI-Y1) and trait anxiety (STAI-Y2) evaluation.
Results In total, 117 eligible patients were included. Regarding SF-36 Physical a 6 months decrease was followed by an improvement at 12 months. Similarly, an increase of the SF-36 Mental health score was identified. In contrast to STAI-Y2, a long-term reduction of the state anxiety was identified. Preoperative SF-36 Physical was inversely correlated with age, while absence of alcohol was associated with lower mental health. Overall, patient characteristics, habits and the administered treatment did not affect the postoperative QoL and anxiety.
Conclusions Patient QoL and anxiety improved during follow up. Although certain characteristics were related to QoL and anxiety, further larger scale studies are required.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Hospital of Larissa, Greece
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data are available by last author
