ABSTRACT
Since the beginning of the pandemic of COVID-19, there has been a widespread assumption that most infected persons are asymptomatic. A frequently-cited early study from China suggested that 86% of all infections were undocumented, which was used as indirect evidence that patients were asymptomatic.
Using data from the most recent wave of the EPICOVID19 study, a nationwide household-based survey including 133 cities from all states of Brazil, we estimated the proportion of people with and without antibodies for SARS-CoV-2 who were asymptomatic, which symptoms were most frequently reported, the number of symptoms reported and the association between symptomatology and socio-demographic characteristics. We were able to test 33,205 subjects using a rapid antibody test that was previously validated. Information on symptoms was collected before participants received the test result. Out of 849 (2.7%) participants who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, only 12.1% (95%CI 10.1-14.5) reported no symptoms since the start of the pandemic, compared to 42.2% (95%CI 41.7-42.8) among those who tested negative. The largest difference between the two groups was observed for changes in smell or taste (56.5% versus 9.1%, a 6.2-fold difference). Symptoms change in smell or taste, fever and myalgia were most likely to predict positive test results as suggested by recursive partitioning tree analysis.
Among individuals without any of these three symptoms (74.2% of the sample), only 0.8% tested positive, compared to 18.3% of those with both fever and changes in smell or taste. Most subjects with antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in Brazil are symptomatic, even though most present only mild symptoms.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
We acknowledge the support from Instituto Serrapilheira, Pastoral da Crianca, the Brazilian Collective Health Association (ABRASCO) and JBS initiative Fazer o Bem Faz Bem
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval was provided by the Brazilian National Ethics Committee, process number 30721520710015313
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
anamene.epi{at}gmail.com, cvictora{at}gmail.com, fernandophratwig{at}gmail.com, mariangelafreitassilveira{at}gmail.com, blhorta{at}gmail.com, abarros.epi{at}gmail.com, mariliaepi{at}gmail.com, fcwehrmeister{at}gmail.com, pellanda{at}ufcspa.edu.br, odirad{at}gmail.com, claustru{at}gmail.com, mnburatt{at}gmail.com, fcbarros.epi{at}gmail.com, prchallal{at}gmail.com
Data Availability
Data will become publicly available 30 days after completion of the fieldwork at http://www.epicovid19brasil.org/