Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Improved Sensitivity of Digits-in-Noise Test to High-Frequency Hearing Loss

View ORCID ProfileLina Motlagh Zadeh, Noah H. Silbert, De Wet Swanepoel, David R. Moore
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.31.20165225
Lina Motlagh Zadeh
1Communication Sciences Research Center, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
2Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lina Motlagh Zadeh
  • For correspondence: Lina.MotlaghZadeh@cchmc.org
Noah H. Silbert
2Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
De Wet Swanepoel
3Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Hatfield 0028, SA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David R. Moore
1Communication Sciences Research Center, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
4Department of Otolaryngology, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA
5Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Objectives Hearing loss is most commonly observed at high frequencies. High-frequency hearing loss (HFHL) precedes and predicts hearing loss at lower frequencies. It was previously shown that an automated, self-administered digits-in-noise (DIN) test can be sensitized for detection of HFHL by low-pass filtering the speech-shaped masking noise at 1.5 kHz. This study was designed to investigate whether sensitivity of the DIN to HFHL can be enhanced further using low-pass noise filters with higher cutoff frequencies.

Design US-English digits 0-9, homogenized for audibility, were binaurally presented in different noise maskers including one broadband and three low-pass (cut-off at 2, 4, 8 kHz) filtered speech-shaped noises. DIN-Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were obtained from 60 normal hearing (NH), and 40 mildly hearing impaired (HI) listeners with bilateral symmetric sensorineural hearing-loss. Standard and extended high frequency audiometric pure tone averages (PTAs) were compared with the DIN-SRTs.

Results Narrower masking noise bandwidth generally produced better (more sensitive) mean DIN-SRTs. There were strong and significant correlations between SRT and PTA in the HI group. Lower frequency, PTALF 0.5,1, 2, 4 kHz had the highest correlation and steepest slope with SRTs obtained from the 2 kHz filter. Higher frequency, PTAHF 4,8,10,12.5 kHz correlated best with SRTs obtained from 4 and 8 kHz filtered noise. The 4 kHz low-pass filter also had the highest sensitivity (92%) and equally-highest (with the 8 kHz filter) specificity (90%) for detecting an average PTAHF of 20 dB or more.

Conclusions Of the filters used, DIN sensitivity to higher frequency hearing loss was greatest using the 4 kHz low-pass filter. These results suggest that low-pass filtered noise may be usefully substituted for broadband noise to improve earlier detection of HFHL using DIN.

Competing Interest Statement

De Wet Swanepoel is co-founder, lead inventor and shareholder, and David Moore is a scientific advisor and shareholder of the hearX Group. No author has any other financial or non-financial interest in relation to the work described.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by NIH grant R21DC016241 and by the Cincinnati Childrens Hospital Research Foundation. David Moore receives support from the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Center.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Cincinnati Children's Hospital-IRB Number: 2018-0180

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 04, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Improved Sensitivity of Digits-in-Noise Test to High-Frequency Hearing Loss
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Improved Sensitivity of Digits-in-Noise Test to High-Frequency Hearing Loss
Lina Motlagh Zadeh, Noah H. Silbert, De Wet Swanepoel, David R. Moore
medRxiv 2020.07.31.20165225; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.31.20165225
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Improved Sensitivity of Digits-in-Noise Test to High-Frequency Hearing Loss
Lina Motlagh Zadeh, Noah H. Silbert, De Wet Swanepoel, David R. Moore
medRxiv 2020.07.31.20165225; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.31.20165225

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Otolaryngology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (76)
  • Allergy and Immunology (194)
  • Anesthesia (54)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (488)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (89)
  • Dermatology (56)
  • Emergency Medicine (168)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (211)
  • Epidemiology (5658)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (215)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (856)
  • Geriatric Medicine (88)
  • Health Economics (229)
  • Health Informatics (759)
  • Health Policy (388)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (250)
  • Hematology (105)
  • HIV/AIDS (181)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (6453)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (388)
  • Medical Education (116)
  • Medical Ethics (28)
  • Nephrology (90)
  • Neurology (845)
  • Nursing (44)
  • Nutrition (141)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (161)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (258)
  • Oncology (514)
  • Ophthalmology (162)
  • Orthopedics (44)
  • Otolaryngology (105)
  • Pain Medicine (45)
  • Palliative Medicine (21)
  • Pathology (149)
  • Pediatrics (248)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (146)
  • Primary Care Research (112)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (958)
  • Public and Global Health (2219)
  • Radiology and Imaging (375)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (172)
  • Respiratory Medicine (310)
  • Rheumatology (109)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (80)
  • Sports Medicine (82)
  • Surgery (118)
  • Toxicology (25)
  • Transplantation (34)
  • Urology (42)