Abstract
To identify individual differences and potential factors influencing age-related cognitive decline and disease, we created MindCrowd. MindCrowd is a cross-sectional web-based assessment of simple visual (sv) reaction time (RT, index of processing speed) and paired-associate learning (PAL, index of verbal episodic memory). svRT and PAL results were combined with 22 survey questions. Analysis of MindCrowd’s svRT data revealed education and reported stroke as potential modifiers of changes in processing speed and memory from younger to older ages (ntotal = 75,666, nwomen = 47,700, nmen = 27,966; ages 18-85 years old, mean (M)Age = 46.54, standard deviation (SD)Age = 18.40). To complement this work, we evaluated complex recognition reaction time (cvrRT) in the UK Biobank cohort (ntotal = 158,249 nwomen = 89,333 nmen = 68,916; ages 40-70 years old, MAge = 55.81, SDAge = 7.72). Similarities between the UK Biobank and MindCrowd were assessed using a subset of the MindCrowd cohort. Labeled UKBb MindCrowd (ntotal = 39,795, nwomen = 29,640, nmen = 10,155; ages 40-70 years old, MAge = 56.59, SDAge = 8.16), this subset was carefully selected to mirror the UK Biobank. An identical linear model (LM) was used to assess both cohorts. The LM revealed similarities between MindCrowd and the UK Biobank across most results, despite obvious cohort differences (e.g., US vs. the UK). Notable divergent findings from the UK Biobank included (1) a first-degree family history of Alzheimer’s disease (FHAD) was associated with longer RTs in only. (2) Compared to being a man with more education, being a woman was associated with longer cvrRT length differences observed from younger to older ages. Divergent results from UKBb MindCrowd include more education and reported smoking. More education was associated with shorter and smoking longer cvrRTs differences observed from younger to older ages. Collected with our prior work, MindCrowd is beginning to reveal the intricate network connecting processing speed, memory, and cognition to healthy and pathological brain aging.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The authors wish to acknowledge the Mueller Family Charitable Trust for funding the initial creation of the MindCrowd site and Mike Mueller for his significant donation of personal time during the development, testing, and ongoing evolution of the study. This work was also supported in part by the State of Arizona DHS in support of the Arizona Alzheimer's Consortium (PI; Eric Reiman), the Flinn Foundation (PI; Matt Huentelman), The McKnight Brain Research Foundation, NIH-NIA grant R01-AG049465 (PI; Carol Barnes), and NIH-NIA grants UH2 AG064706, U19 AG023122, U24 AG051129, and U24 AG051129-04S1 (PI; Nicholas J. Schork) We also acknowledge the support of many anonymous individual donors and institutional support of TGen, City of Hope, and the University of Arizona. Philanthropic fundraising efforts for MindCrowd were led by the TGen Foundation staff (Erin Massey, Chief Development Officer).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Approval for MindCrowd was obtained from the Western Institutional Review Board (WIRB study number 1129241). The research ethics committee approved the UK Biobank (11/NW/0382).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Final data will be filtered to exclude irrelevant data fields and be made available before peer-reviewed publication on Dryad (https://datadryad.org).