ABSTRACT
This study investigated the factor structure of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) by comparing the fit of a single-factor model, a correlated model with two or three factors, and a bifactor model with one general and two or three specific factors. Different three-factor solutions that varied with regard to the specification of the item “talks excessively” as impulsivity or hyperactivity were also tested. Parent ratings on the ADHD-Rating Scale (ADHD-RS-IV) were collected in a sample of 2044 schoolchildren (1st to 3rd grade) from the general population and in a clinical sample of 165 children and adolescents with ADHD referred to a public regional child and adolescent psychiatric hospital. Confirmatory factor analyses found a satisfactory fit for most models in both samples. However, a correlated three-factor model where “talks excessively” was included as an indicator of impulsivity and especially the bifactor version of this model with one general and three specific factors fit the data slightly better in the general population. In the clinical sample, a number of models performed equally well (the same version of the correlated three-factor model and all the bifactor models). Overall, the factor structure of ADHD seems to be better characterized by a bifactor model with a strong general factor and two or three weaker specific factors. Due to the strong general factor, we suggest emphasizing the ADHD-RS-IV total score rather than the subscale scores in clinical practice.
Competing Interest Statement
Per Hove Thomsen has received speaker's fee from Medice and Shire within the last three years. Edmund J.S. Sonuga-Barke has received speaker's fee from Shire and served as consultant to Neurotech Solutions within the last three years. Trine Wigh Arildskov, Anne Virring, Rikke Lambek, Anders Helles Carlsen, and Søren D. Ø,stergaard declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Clinical Trial
The study was not registered because this study is not a clinical trial but based on a parent-reported survey of ADHD symptoms in schoolchildren in the general population and data from another study of sleep problems in children with ADHD (which was not a clinical trial).
Funding Statement
The project was funded by the Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF15OC0017706); the Lundbeck Foundation (R208-2015-3329); the A.P. Møller Foundation for the Advancement of Medical Science (15-15); the Research Foundation for the Center for the Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Central Denmark Region (BUC16-TWA, BUC17-TWA); the Psychiatric Research Foundation for the Central Denmark Region (no grant number); the Riisfort Fonden (no grant number); and the Brødrene Hartmanns Fond (R69-A28284-B23205).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The survey was registered with and approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (1-16-02-542-15), and the data was processed and stored in accordance with the European Union General Data Protection Regulation. Ethical review board approval is not required for survey-based studies in Denmark. The study by Virring et al. providing data for this analysis was approved by the Danish Regional Ethics Committee (M-20100231) and the Danish Data Protection Agency (2010-41-5472).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The participants have not agreed to the data being shared. For this reason, the data is only available to the authors of this manuscript.