ABSTRACT
Offset analgesia (OA), a large reduction in pain following a brief increase in intensity of an otherwise stable painful stimulus, has been established by a large body of research. But the opposite effect, onset hyperalgesia (OH), a disproportional hyperalgesic response following a briefly decreased intensity of a painful stimulus, has only been investigated in one previous study. The aim of this study was to induce OA and OH in healthy participants and explore the effects of different stimulus ranges on OA and OH. A total of 62 participants were tested in two identical experiments. OA and OH conditions included two different temperature deviations (±1°C/±2°C) from baseline and were compared to a constant temperature (control). OA was successfully elicited in three out of four conditions. A dose-response relationship was demonstrated between the increase of temperature and the resulting hypoalgesic response. OH was only elicited in one out of four conditions (OH2°C in experiment 1). Exploratory analysis showed that OA and OH responses were only weakly correlated. The asymmetry between pain responses following a brief temperature increase and decrease could be seen as evidence for different mechanisms involved in the pain responses to increasing and decreasing temperature. This asymmetry may also be explained by high temperatures in OA condition (+1°C/+2°C above baseline) that could be seen as salient “learning signals”, which augment the response to following changes in temperature.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The study was financed by a private donation to Karin Jensen from the Lundblad family
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Ethics Committee of the Medical Board in Stockholm, Sweden, approved the study and all subjects gave written informed consent (Dnr: 2018/1367-31/1).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data will be made available upon request