Abstract
Non-invasive SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing is urgently needed to estimate the incidence and prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection at the general population level. Precise knowledge of population immunity could allow government bodies to make informed decisions about how and when to relax stay-at-home directives and to reopen the economy. We hypothesized that salivary antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 could serve as a non-invasive alternative to serological testing for widespread monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 infection throughout the population. We developed a multiplex SARS-CoV-2 antibody immunoassay based on Luminex technology and tested 167 saliva and 324 serum samples, including 134 and 118 negative saliva and serum samples, respectively, collected before the COVID-19 pandemic, and 33 saliva and 206 serum samples from participants with RT-PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. We evaluated the correlation of results obtained in saliva vs. serum and determined the sensitivity and specificity for each diagnostic media, stratified by antibody isotype, for detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection based on COVID-19 case designation for all specimens. Matched serum and saliva SARS-CoV-2 antigen-specific IgG responses were significantly correlated. Within the 10-plex SARS-CoV-2 panel, the salivary anti-nucleocapsid (N) protein IgG response resulted in the highest sensitivity for detecting prior SARS-CoV-2 infection (100% sensitivity at ≥10 days post-SARS-CoV-2 symptom onset). The salivary anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) IgG response resulted in 100% specificity. Among individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed with RT-PCR, the temporal kinetics of IgG, IgA, and IgM in saliva were consistent with those observed in serum. SARS-CoV-2 appears to trigger a humoral immune response resulting in the almost simultaneous rise of IgG, IgM and IgA levels both in serum and in saliva, mirroring responses consistent with the stimulation of existing, cross-reactive B cells. SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing in saliva can play a critically important role in large-scale 'sero'-surveillance to address key public health priorities and guide policy and decision-making for COVID-19.
Competing Interest Statement
In the interest of full disclosure, D.A.G. is founder and Chief Scientific and Strategy Advisor at Salimetrics, LLC and Salivabio, LLC and these relationships are managed by the policies of the committees on conflict of interest at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and the University of California at Irvine. N.R. received funds from Sanofi Pasteur, Quidel, Merck and Pfizer.
Funding Statement
Funding for this study was provided by the Johns Hopkins University Provosts Office and the FIA Foundation. P.R.R., N.P., K.K., and C.D.H. were supported by a gift from the GRACE Communications Foundation. C.D.H., N.P., and B.D. were additionally supported by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) grants R21AI139784 and R43AI141265, and National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) grant R01ES026973. C.D.H. was also supported by NIAID grant R01AI130066 and NIH grant U24OD023382. A.P. and S.L.K. were supported by NIH/NIAID Center of Excellence in Influenza Research and Surveillance contract HHS N2772201400007C. O.L. was supported by the Division of Intramural Research, NIAID. The funders had no role in study design, data analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study has been approved by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Institutional Review Board (IRB) (IRB No. IRB00012253) Johns Hopkins Medicine IRB (IRB No. IRB00247886) and by the Emory University Institutional Review Board (IRB No. 00110683).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Requests for de-identified data should be submitted to the authors.
