Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Computational Simulation to Assess Patient Safety of Uncompensated COVID-19 Two-patient Ventilator Sharing Using the Pulse Physiology Engine

View ORCID ProfileJeffrey B. Webb, Aaron Bray, Philip K. Asare, Rachel B. Clipp, Yatin B. Mehta, Sudheer Penupolu, Aalpen A. Patel, S. Mark Poler
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.19.20107201
Jeffrey B. Webb
1Kitware, Inc., 101 E Weaver Street Suite G, Carrboro, NC 27510
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jeffrey B. Webb
  • For correspondence: jeff.webb@kitware.com
Aaron Bray
1Kitware, Inc., 101 E Weaver Street Suite G, Carrboro, NC 27510
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philip K. Asare
2Electrical and Computer Engineering, Bucknell University, 1 Dent Dr, Lewisburg, PA 17837, USA
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachel B. Clipp
1Kitware, Inc., 101 E Weaver Street Suite G, Carrboro, NC 27510
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yatin B. Mehta
3Critical Care Medicine, Geisinger, 100 N Academy Ave, Danville, PA 17822, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sudheer Penupolu
3Critical Care Medicine, Geisinger, 100 N Academy Ave, Danville, PA 17822, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aalpen A. Patel
4Radiology, Geisinger, 100 N Academy Ave, Danville, PA 17822, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Mark Poler
5Anesthesiology, Geisinger, 100 N Academy Ave, Danville, PA 17822, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background The COVID-19 pandemic is stretching medical resources internationally, including creating ventilator short-ages that complicate clinical and ethical situations. The possibility of needing to ventilate multiple patients with a single ventilator raises patient health and safety concerns. This simulation study explores patient compatibility and ventilator settings during multi-patient ventilation without the use of flow compensating resistances.

Methods A whole-body computational physiology model was used to simulate each patient on a ventilator. The primary model of a single patient with a dedicated ventilator was augmented to model two patients sharing a single ventilator. A range of ventilator settings and patient characteristics were simulated for paired patients. In addition to mechanical ventilation parameters, the full physiological simulation provides estimates of additional values for oxyhemoglobin saturation, arterial oxygen tension, and other patient parameters.

Findings These simulations show patient outcome during multi-patient ventilation is most closely correlated to lung compliance, oxygenation index, oxygen saturation index, and endtidal carbon dioxide of individual patients. The simulated patient outcome metrics were satisfactory when the lung compliance difference between two patients was less than 12 cmH2O/mL, and the oxygen saturation index difference was less than 2 mmHg.

Interpretation In resource-limited regions of the world, the COVID-19 pandemic will result in equipment shortages. While single-patient ventilation is preferable, if unavailable, these simulations provide a conceptual framework for clinical patient selection guidelines if ventilator sharing is the only available alternative.

Funding Kitware employees were internally supported by Kitware. Bucknell and Geisinger participants contributed their time.

Evidence before this study If numbers of patients requiring mechanical ventilation exceed the number of available ventilators in a surge, shared branched ventilator circuits have been proposed for sharing one ventilator by multiple patients. Only rudimentary laboratory or clinical studies have been reported. Testing over expected ranges of lung-chest wall compliance has not been found. Few clinical experiences of mechanical ventilation parameters employed for COVID-19 patients have been reported.

Added value of this study The number of possible combinations of ventilation and physiological parameters is very large. Time and resource constraints do not permit conventional research. Computational simulation provides rapid sensitivity evaluation of several factors over a wide range of hypothetical ventilation conditions. Envelopes of evaluated parameters may provide reasonably estimated safety boundaries for clinicians compelled in an emergency surge to employ a poorly characterized practice. A previously well-vetted computational model for ventilation of a single patient by a dedicated ventilator has been modified to model the sharing of a single ventilator by two or more patients. Only pairings of two equally sized 70 kg patients are modeled in this report. These simulations provide estimates of effects on ventilation and blood oxygenation by clinically measurable values using conceivable mismatched patient lung compliance and oxygenation (diffusion and shunt).

Implications of all the available evidence These estimates are for pressure mode ventilation using a single ventilator shared by branched breathing apparatus for paired patients. Individual patient flow restriction to compensate for compliance mismatch is not considered. Reasonable though arbitrary bounds of acceptable parameters may guide clinicians when determining pairings of patients with different physiological characteristics. Further laboratory testing and clinical experience will be needed to determine the validity or utility of these assessments. Different simulations will be needed for flow-compensated branches, more than two patients, and unmatched body habitus.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

No external funding was received. Kitware employees were internally supported by Kitware. Bucknell and Geisinger participants contributed their time.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data is available as open source (Apache License, Version 2.0).

https://gitlab.kitware.com/physiology/engine/-/blob/3.x/src/cpp/study/multiplex_ventilation/ReadMe.md

https://gitlab.kitware.com/physiology/engine/-/tags/STUDY_MULTIPLEX_VENTILATION_1_0_0

https://gitlab.kitware.com/physiology/jupyter

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 26, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Computational Simulation to Assess Patient Safety of Uncompensated COVID-19 Two-patient Ventilator Sharing Using the Pulse Physiology Engine
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Computational Simulation to Assess Patient Safety of Uncompensated COVID-19 Two-patient Ventilator Sharing Using the Pulse Physiology Engine
Jeffrey B. Webb, Aaron Bray, Philip K. Asare, Rachel B. Clipp, Yatin B. Mehta, Sudheer Penupolu, Aalpen A. Patel, S. Mark Poler
medRxiv 2020.05.19.20107201; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.19.20107201
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Computational Simulation to Assess Patient Safety of Uncompensated COVID-19 Two-patient Ventilator Sharing Using the Pulse Physiology Engine
Jeffrey B. Webb, Aaron Bray, Philip K. Asare, Rachel B. Clipp, Yatin B. Mehta, Sudheer Penupolu, Aalpen A. Patel, S. Mark Poler
medRxiv 2020.05.19.20107201; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.19.20107201

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (271)
  • Allergy and Immunology (553)
  • Anesthesia (135)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1761)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (238)
  • Dermatology (173)
  • Emergency Medicine (312)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (661)
  • Epidemiology (10803)
  • Forensic Medicine (8)
  • Gastroenterology (593)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2954)
  • Geriatric Medicine (287)
  • Health Economics (534)
  • Health Informatics (1930)
  • Health Policy (836)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (745)
  • Hematology (293)
  • HIV/AIDS (631)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12520)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (693)
  • Medical Education (299)
  • Medical Ethics (86)
  • Nephrology (324)
  • Neurology (2801)
  • Nursing (151)
  • Nutrition (433)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (559)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (597)
  • Oncology (1469)
  • Ophthalmology (444)
  • Orthopedics (172)
  • Otolaryngology (257)
  • Pain Medicine (190)
  • Palliative Medicine (56)
  • Pathology (381)
  • Pediatrics (867)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (366)
  • Primary Care Research (338)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2642)
  • Public and Global Health (5376)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1015)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (597)
  • Respiratory Medicine (726)
  • Rheumatology (330)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (289)
  • Sports Medicine (279)
  • Surgery (327)
  • Toxicology (47)
  • Transplantation (150)
  • Urology (126)