Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Diagnosing COVID-19 infection: the danger of over-reliance on positive test results

View ORCID ProfileAndrew N Cohen, View ORCID ProfileBruce Kessel, View ORCID ProfileMichael G Milgroom
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.26.20080911
Andrew N Cohen
1 Center for Research on Aquatic Bioinvasions;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Andrew N Cohen
  • For correspondence: acohen@bioinvasions.com
Bruce Kessel
2 John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Bruce Kessel
  • For correspondence: bkessel@queens.org
Michael G Milgroom
3 Cornell University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Michael G Milgroom
  • Abstract
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Unlike previous epidemics, in addressing COVID-19 nearly all international health organizations and national health ministries have treated a single positive result from a PCR-based test as confirmation of infection, even in asymptomatic persons without any history of exposure. This is based on a widespread belief that positive results in these tests are highly reliable. However, data on PCR-based tests for similar viruses show that PCR-based testing produces enough false positive results to make positive results highly unreliable over a broad range of real-world scenarios. This has clinical and case management implications, and affects an array of epidemiological statistics, including the asymptomatic ratio, prevalence, and hospitalization and death rates. Steps should be taken to raise awareness of false positives, reduce their frequency, and mitigate their effects. In the interim, positive results in asymptomatic individuals that haven't been confirmed by a second test should be considered suspect.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The was no funding for this research.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

All necessary approvals have been obtained.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • The material in the text, the figures and the supplemental file has been updated; Figure 1 includes data for some additional countries; and the text follows a different format. Note that the relevant Supplemental Material file is labeled Version 3.

Data Availability

All relevant data are included in the text or supplementary material.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 18, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Diagnosing COVID-19 infection: the danger of over-reliance on positive test results
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Diagnosing COVID-19 infection: the danger of over-reliance on positive test results
Andrew N Cohen, Bruce Kessel, Michael G Milgroom
medRxiv 2020.04.26.20080911; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.26.20080911
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Diagnosing COVID-19 infection: the danger of over-reliance on positive test results
Andrew N Cohen, Bruce Kessel, Michael G Milgroom
medRxiv 2020.04.26.20080911; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.26.20080911

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (62)
  • Allergy and Immunology (142)
  • Anesthesia (46)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (415)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (70)
  • Dermatology (47)
  • Emergency Medicine (144)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (171)
  • Epidemiology (4857)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (183)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (676)
  • Geriatric Medicine (70)
  • Health Economics (192)
  • Health Informatics (630)
  • Health Policy (320)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (206)
  • Hematology (85)
  • HIV/AIDS (156)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (5339)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (331)
  • Medical Education (93)
  • Medical Ethics (24)
  • Nephrology (75)
  • Neurology (686)
  • Nursing (42)
  • Nutrition (115)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (126)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (208)
  • Oncology (439)
  • Ophthalmology (140)
  • Orthopedics (36)
  • Otolaryngology (89)
  • Pain Medicine (35)
  • Palliative Medicine (16)
  • Pathology (129)
  • Pediatrics (194)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (131)
  • Primary Care Research (84)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (780)
  • Public and Global Health (1816)
  • Radiology and Imaging (324)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (138)
  • Respiratory Medicine (255)
  • Rheumatology (86)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (69)
  • Sports Medicine (62)
  • Surgery (100)
  • Toxicology (23)
  • Transplantation (29)
  • Urology (37)