Abstract
The pathophysiology of many chronic pain disorders is far from evident. MR imaging studies provided initial data indicating chronic pain might lead to changes in brain structure and function. These changes may contribute to cognitive and emotional impairment and maybe even to the chronification of pain. However, the evidence for pain-related changes in gray and white matter is inconclusive so far. Hence we investigated potential changes of white matter microstructure in 34 adults with chronic noncancer pain (> 1 year) and 34 sex- and age-matched healthy individuals using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Whole-brain tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) analyses of fractional anisotropy, mode of diffusivity, mean diffusivity, axial diffusivity, and radial diffusivity did not show significant differences after correction for multiple comparisons. The volumes of subdivisons of the corpus callosum were not significantly different either. We also performed a systematic review of the existing literature on white matter microstructure in patients with chronic pain following PRISMA guidelines. We identified 53 eligible studies on DTI in chronic pain. These studies demonstrated conflicting results regarding the direction and location of white matter changes across all diagnoses and within major diagnostic subcategories. We propose that two factors primarily contribute to this low reproducibility, small sample size and the use of potentially unreliable DTI parameters derived from the single-tensor model.
- pain
- DTI
- white matter
- fractional anisotropy
- corpus callosum
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The study was funded by an intramural grant from the School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Oldenburg, to C. Bantel (Forschungspool, 2015- 1). The study was also supported by the Neuroimaging Unit, University of Oldenburg, funded by grants from the German Research Foundation (DFG; 3T MRI INST 184/152-1 FUGG and MEG INST 184/148-1 FUGG).
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
