Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Impact of healthcare worker shift scheduling on workforce preservation during the COVID-19 pandemic

Dan M. Kluger, Yariv Aizenbud, Ariel Jaffe, Fabio Parisi, Lilach Aizenbud, Eyal Minsky-Fenick, Jonathan M. Kluger, Shelli Farhadian, Harriet M. Kluger, View ORCID ProfileYuval Kluger
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.15.20061168
Dan M. Kluger
1Department of Statistics, Stanford University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yariv Aizenbud
2Program of Applied Mathematics, Yale University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ariel Jaffe
2Program of Applied Mathematics, Yale University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fabio Parisi
7Department of Pathology, Yale University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lilach Aizenbud
3Yale Cancer Center
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eyal Minsky-Fenick
2Program of Applied Mathematics, Yale University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonathan M. Kluger
4School of Medicine, Yale University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shelli Farhadian
5Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Yale University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Harriet M. Kluger
3Yale Cancer Center
6Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Yale University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuval Kluger
2Program of Applied Mathematics, Yale University
3Yale Cancer Center
7Department of Pathology, Yale University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Yuval Kluger
  • For correspondence: yuval.kluger@yale.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Background As we contend with the massive SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, preventing infections among healthcare workers (HCWs) and patients is critical for delivering care to patients admitted for other purposes, and many standard scheduling practices require reassessment. In most academic hospitals in the United States, inpatient rotations are designed to deliver optimal patient care by staggering rotations of attendings and house-staff, and much emphasis is placed on HCW burnout, yet during a pandemic preventing further infection is the single most important factor. Our purpose was to model various inpatient rotation schedules of physicians and nurses to determine patterns associated with optimal workforce preservation and lower nosocomial infections in settings in which personal protective equipment is imperfect or unavailable.

Summary of Methods We simulated the spread of COVID-19 in hospital wards using Monte Carlo methods. Universal model parameters for COVID-19 included incubation period distribution and latent period distribution. Situation-dependent COVID-19 model parameters included pre-admission infection probability, team member infection probability, physician-to-patient, nurse-to-patient, patient-to-physician, patient-to-nurse, and HCW-to-HCW transmission probabilities, team member absence after symptom onset, daily SARS-CoV-2 exposure probability of team members (e.g. via exposure to other staff), length of admission after COVID-19 symptoms, and length of simulation time. Model parameters that varied by hospital setting and service type included average patient load per team, average patient hospitalization, and number of physicians and nurses on a team and on duty.

Results The primary outcome measure was probability of team failure, defined as the likelihood that at some point there are insufficient attendings, house-staff or nurses to staff a fully functioning floor. In all of our simulations, physician and nurse rotation lengths of 1-3 days led to higher team failure rates. Nursing shifts of 12 versus 8 hours and avoiding staggering of physician rotations also decreased the chance of team failure.

Conclusions Simple changes in staff scheduling, such as lengthening nursing shifts or avoiding rotations that are either staggered or last fewer than three days, can result in improved workforce preservation. These workforce scheduling changes are easy to implement.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

None

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

This study is not based on newly generated data

https://github.com/KlugerLab/Rotation-Scheduler

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 30, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Impact of healthcare worker shift scheduling on workforce preservation during the COVID-19 pandemic
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Impact of healthcare worker shift scheduling on workforce preservation during the COVID-19 pandemic
Dan M. Kluger, Yariv Aizenbud, Ariel Jaffe, Fabio Parisi, Lilach Aizenbud, Eyal Minsky-Fenick, Jonathan M. Kluger, Shelli Farhadian, Harriet M. Kluger, Yuval Kluger
medRxiv 2020.04.15.20061168; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.15.20061168
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Impact of healthcare worker shift scheduling on workforce preservation during the COVID-19 pandemic
Dan M. Kluger, Yariv Aizenbud, Ariel Jaffe, Fabio Parisi, Lilach Aizenbud, Eyal Minsky-Fenick, Jonathan M. Kluger, Shelli Farhadian, Harriet M. Kluger, Yuval Kluger
medRxiv 2020.04.15.20061168; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.15.20061168

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (62)
  • Allergy and Immunology (142)
  • Anesthesia (44)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (408)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (67)
  • Dermatology (47)
  • Emergency Medicine (141)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (171)
  • Epidemiology (4809)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (177)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (671)
  • Geriatric Medicine (70)
  • Health Economics (187)
  • Health Informatics (621)
  • Health Policy (314)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (200)
  • Hematology (85)
  • HIV/AIDS (155)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (5280)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (326)
  • Medical Education (91)
  • Medical Ethics (24)
  • Nephrology (73)
  • Neurology (677)
  • Nursing (41)
  • Nutrition (110)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (124)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (203)
  • Oncology (438)
  • Ophthalmology (138)
  • Orthopedics (36)
  • Otolaryngology (88)
  • Pain Medicine (35)
  • Palliative Medicine (15)
  • Pathology (127)
  • Pediatrics (193)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (129)
  • Primary Care Research (84)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (768)
  • Public and Global Health (1798)
  • Radiology and Imaging (321)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (138)
  • Respiratory Medicine (255)
  • Rheumatology (86)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (68)
  • Sports Medicine (61)
  • Surgery (100)
  • Toxicology (23)
  • Transplantation (28)
  • Urology (37)