Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Informing Homemade Emergency Facemask Design: The Ability of Common Fabrics to Filter Ultrafine Particles

View ORCID ProfileEugenia O’Kelly, View ORCID ProfileSophia Pirog, View ORCID ProfileJames Ward, View ORCID ProfileP. John Clarkson
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.14.20065375
Eugenia O’Kelly
1Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge – currently in San Francisco, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Eugenia O’Kelly
  • For correspondence: eo339@cam.ac.uk
Sophia Pirog
2Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University – Chicago, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sophia Pirog
James Ward
3Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge – Cambridge, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for James Ward
P. John Clarkson
3Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge – Cambridge, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for P. John Clarkson
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Objectives To examine the ability of fabrics which might be used to create homemade face masks to filter out ultrafine (smaller than 1μm in diameter) particles.

Method Twenty commonly available fabrics and materials were evaluated for their ability to reduce air concentrations of ultrafine particles. Further assessment was made on the filtration ability of select fabrics while damp and of fabric combinations which might be used to construct homemade masks.

Results Single fabric layers blocked a range of ultrafine particles. When fabrics were layered, significantly more ultrafine particles were filtered. Several fabric combinations were successful in removing similar amounts of ultrafine particles when compared to an N95 mask and surgical mask.

Conclusions The current coronavirus pandemic has left many communities without access to commercial facemasks. Our findings suggest that face masks made from layered common fabric can help filter ultrafine particles and provide some protection for the wearer when commercial facemasks are unavailable.

STRENGHTS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY

  • Tested a large number of potential facemask materials

  • Tested ability of materials to filter virus-sized particles dry and while damp

  • Did not discriminate between pathogenic and non-pathogenic particles

  • Breathing resistance was estimated based on qualitative feedback

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

DATA STATEMENT

Data from this study is freely available under a CC BY license on Cambridge University’s Apollo open data repository.

Link: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.51390

Citation: O’Kelly, E., The Ability of Common Fabrics to Filter Ultrafine Particles [Data file]. Cambridge University: Cambridge, United Kingdom; 2020.https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.51390

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 17, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Informing Homemade Emergency Facemask Design: The Ability of Common Fabrics to Filter Ultrafine Particles
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Informing Homemade Emergency Facemask Design: The Ability of Common Fabrics to Filter Ultrafine Particles
Eugenia O’Kelly, Sophia Pirog, James Ward, P. John Clarkson
medRxiv 2020.04.14.20065375; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.14.20065375
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Informing Homemade Emergency Facemask Design: The Ability of Common Fabrics to Filter Ultrafine Particles
Eugenia O’Kelly, Sophia Pirog, James Ward, P. John Clarkson
medRxiv 2020.04.14.20065375; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.14.20065375

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (269)
  • Allergy and Immunology (551)
  • Anesthesia (135)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1751)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (238)
  • Dermatology (172)
  • Emergency Medicine (312)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (656)
  • Epidemiology (10790)
  • Forensic Medicine (8)
  • Gastroenterology (586)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2939)
  • Geriatric Medicine (287)
  • Health Economics (532)
  • Health Informatics (1921)
  • Health Policy (834)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (744)
  • Hematology (291)
  • HIV/AIDS (628)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12509)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (687)
  • Medical Education (299)
  • Medical Ethics (86)
  • Nephrology (324)
  • Neurology (2789)
  • Nursing (151)
  • Nutrition (432)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (556)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (597)
  • Oncology (1460)
  • Ophthalmology (443)
  • Orthopedics (172)
  • Otolaryngology (255)
  • Pain Medicine (190)
  • Palliative Medicine (56)
  • Pathology (380)
  • Pediatrics (865)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (363)
  • Primary Care Research (336)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2635)
  • Public and Global Health (5349)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1008)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (595)
  • Respiratory Medicine (725)
  • Rheumatology (329)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (289)
  • Sports Medicine (278)
  • Surgery (327)
  • Toxicology (47)
  • Transplantation (149)
  • Urology (125)