Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Comparison of different exit scenarios from the lock-down for COVID-19 epidemic in the UK and assessing uncertainty of the predictions

View ORCID ProfileAnatoly Zhigljavsky, View ORCID ProfileRoger Whitaker, View ORCID ProfileIvan Fesenko, View ORCID ProfileKobi Kremnizer, Jack Noonan
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.09.20059451
Anatoly Zhigljavsky
*Cardiff University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Anatoly Zhigljavsky
  • For correspondence: zhigljavskyaa@cardiff.ac.uk
Roger Whitaker
*Cardiff University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Roger Whitaker
Ivan Fesenko
†University of Nottingham
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ivan Fesenko
Kobi Kremnizer
‡University of Oxford
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kobi Kremnizer
Jack Noonan
*Cardiff University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

We model further development of the COVID-19 epidemic in the UK given the current data and assuming different scenarios of handling the epidemic. In this research, we further extend the stochastic model suggested in [1] and incorporate in it all available to us knowledge about parameters characterising the behaviour of the virus and the illness induced by it. The models we use are flexible, comprehensive, fast to run and allow us to incorporate the following:

  • time-dependent strategies of handling the epidemic;

  • spatial heterogeneity of the population and heterogeneity of development of epidemic in different areas;

  • special characteristics of particular groups of people, especially people with specific medical pre-histories and elderly.

Standard epidemiological models such as SIR and many of its modifications are not flexible enough and hence are not precise enough in the studies that requires the use of the features above. Decision-makers get serious benefits from using better and more flexible models as they can avoid of nuanced lock-downs, better plan the exit strategy based on local population data, different stages of the epidemic in different areas, making specific recommendations to specific groups of people; all this resulting in a lesser impact on economy, improved forecasts of regional demand upon NHS allowing for intelligent resource allocation.

In this work, we investigate the sensitivity of the model to all its parameters while considering several realistic scenarios of what is likely to happen with the dynamics of the epidemic after the lock-down, which has started on March 23, is lifted.

The main findings from this research are the following

  • very little gain, in terms of the projected hospital bed occupancy and expected numbers of death, of continuing the lock-down beyond April 13, provided the isolation of older and vulnerable people continues and the public carries on some level of isolation in the next 2-3 months, see Section 3.1;

  • in agreement with [1], isolation of the group of vulnerable people during the next 2-3 months should be one of the main priorities, see Section 3.2;

  • it is of high importance that the whole population carries on some level of isolation in the next 2-3 months, see Section 3.5;

  • the timing of the current lock-down seems to be very sensible in areas like London where the epidemic has started to pick up by March 23; in such areas the second wave of epidemic is not expected, see figures in Sections 2.2 and 3;

  • the epidemic should almost completely finish in July, no global second wave should be expected, except areas where the first wave is almost absent, see Section 3.4.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

No external funding received.

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The paper is based on simulation data only.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 14, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of different exit scenarios from the lock-down for COVID-19 epidemic in the UK and assessing uncertainty of the predictions
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Comparison of different exit scenarios from the lock-down for COVID-19 epidemic in the UK and assessing uncertainty of the predictions
Anatoly Zhigljavsky, Roger Whitaker, Ivan Fesenko, Kobi Kremnizer, Jack Noonan
medRxiv 2020.04.09.20059451; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.09.20059451
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Comparison of different exit scenarios from the lock-down for COVID-19 epidemic in the UK and assessing uncertainty of the predictions
Anatoly Zhigljavsky, Roger Whitaker, Ivan Fesenko, Kobi Kremnizer, Jack Noonan
medRxiv 2020.04.09.20059451; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.09.20059451

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (271)
  • Allergy and Immunology (559)
  • Anesthesia (135)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1778)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (240)
  • Dermatology (173)
  • Emergency Medicine (317)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (662)
  • Epidemiology (10834)
  • Forensic Medicine (8)
  • Gastroenterology (595)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2968)
  • Geriatric Medicine (289)
  • Health Economics (534)
  • Health Informatics (1938)
  • Health Policy (837)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (747)
  • Hematology (295)
  • HIV/AIDS (634)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12535)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (697)
  • Medical Education (300)
  • Medical Ethics (89)
  • Nephrology (325)
  • Neurology (2819)
  • Nursing (152)
  • Nutrition (435)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (560)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (600)
  • Oncology (1475)
  • Ophthalmology (444)
  • Orthopedics (172)
  • Otolaryngology (259)
  • Pain Medicine (190)
  • Palliative Medicine (56)
  • Pathology (382)
  • Pediatrics (870)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (368)
  • Primary Care Research (341)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2653)
  • Public and Global Health (5393)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1019)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (599)
  • Respiratory Medicine (729)
  • Rheumatology (330)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (294)
  • Sports Medicine (280)
  • Surgery (329)
  • Toxicology (48)
  • Transplantation (151)
  • Urology (127)