ABSTRACT
Physicians’ cognitive empathy is associated with improved diagnosis and better patient outcomes. The relationship between self-reported and performance-based measures of cognitive empathic processes is unclear. This study examined the association between medical students’ empathy scale scores and their empathic performance in a perspective-taking task and communication skills assessment. Undergraduate medical students (N=91) completed the following: Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy (JSPE); Empathy Quotient (EQ); a Level-1 visual perspective-taking task (VPT). Clinical communication skills were measured in a simulation-enhanced ‘breaking bad news’ assessment. Pearson’s or Spearman’s correlation coefficients and t-tests were used to determine correlation and group differences, respectively. Higher scores on the “Standing in Patients’ Shoes” sub-scale of the JSPE were associated with lower egocentric bias (r = -0.299, p < 0.05) in the VPT, which relates to capacity to adopt someone else’s perspective without being erroneously influenced by our own point of view. Additionally, a lower self-perspective advantage in the VPT, reflecting less attentional priority given to the self-perspective, was associated with higher scores on the the “Cognitive Empathy” (r = -0.283, p < 0.05) and “Emotional Empathy” (r = -0.342, p < 0.01) sub-scales of the EQ. Improved communication skills performance was associated with higher scores on the “Social Skills” EQ sub-scale (r = 0.298, p < 0.005). We show that self-assessment scores are moderately associated with performance-based measures of perspective-taking and communication skills. These results are expected to lead to improved experimental designs and a better understanding of empathy in medical education.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
None
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author, CO'T.