Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Spatial modeling cannot currently differentiate SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus and human distributions on the basis of climate in the United States

View ORCID ProfileRobert Harbert, Seth W. Cunningham, View ORCID ProfileMichael Tessler
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.08.20057281
Robert Harbert
1Stonehill College, Easton, Massachusetts
2Sackler Institute for Comparative Genomics, American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Robert Harbert
  • For correspondence: rharbert{at}stonehill.edu mtessler{at}amnh.org
Seth W. Cunningham
2Sackler Institute for Comparative Genomics, American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Tessler
2Sackler Institute for Comparative Genomics, American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Michael Tessler
  • For correspondence: rharbert{at}stonehill.edu mtessler{at}amnh.org
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

The SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus is wreaking havoc globally, yet knowledge of its biology is limited. Climate and seasonality influence the distributions of many diseases, and studies suggest a link between SARS-CoV-2 and cool weather. One such study, building species distribution models (SDMs), predicted SARS-CoV-2 risk may remain concentrated in the Northern Hemisphere, shifting northward in summer months. Others have highlighted issues with SARS-CoV-2 SDMs, notably: the primary niche of the virus is the host it infects, climate may be a weak distributional predictor, global prevalence data have issues, and the virus is not in a population equilibrium. While these issues should be considered, climate still may be important for predicting the future distribution of SARS-CoV-2. To further examine if there is a link, we model with raw cases and population scaled cases for SARS-CoV-2 county-level data from the United States. We show that SDMs built from population scaled cases data cannot be distinguished from control models built from raw human population data, while SDMs built on raw data fail to predict the current known distribution of cases in the US. The population scaled analyses indicate that climate may not play a central role in current US viral distribution and that human population density is likely a primary driver. Still, we do find slightly more population scaled viral cases in cooler areas. This coupled with our geographically constrained focus make it so we cannot rule out climate as a partial driver of the US SARS-CoV-2 distribution. Climate’s role on SARS-CoV-2 should continue to be cautiously examined, but at this time we should assume that SARS-CoV-2 can spread anywhere in the US.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This work was conducted with no external funding during a period of time when normal research funds have been suspended for all authors.

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Data and code for this study are archived at https://github.com/rsh249/cv19_enm/releases/tag/v0.0.2

https://github.com/rsh249/cv19_enm/releases/tag/v0.0.2

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 10, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Spatial modeling cannot currently differentiate SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus and human distributions on the basis of climate in the United States
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Spatial modeling cannot currently differentiate SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus and human distributions on the basis of climate in the United States
Robert Harbert, Seth W. Cunningham, Michael Tessler
medRxiv 2020.04.08.20057281; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.08.20057281
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Spatial modeling cannot currently differentiate SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus and human distributions on the basis of climate in the United States
Robert Harbert, Seth W. Cunningham, Michael Tessler
medRxiv 2020.04.08.20057281; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.08.20057281

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (427)
  • Allergy and Immunology (753)
  • Anesthesia (220)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (3281)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (362)
  • Dermatology (274)
  • Emergency Medicine (478)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1164)
  • Epidemiology (13336)
  • Forensic Medicine (19)
  • Gastroenterology (896)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5127)
  • Geriatric Medicine (479)
  • Health Economics (780)
  • Health Informatics (3250)
  • Health Policy (1137)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1189)
  • Hematology (427)
  • HIV/AIDS (1012)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (14611)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (908)
  • Medical Education (475)
  • Medical Ethics (126)
  • Nephrology (521)
  • Neurology (4898)
  • Nursing (261)
  • Nutrition (725)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (879)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (795)
  • Oncology (2515)
  • Ophthalmology (722)
  • Orthopedics (280)
  • Otolaryngology (346)
  • Pain Medicine (323)
  • Palliative Medicine (90)
  • Pathology (537)
  • Pediatrics (1297)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (548)
  • Primary Care Research (554)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (4189)
  • Public and Global Health (7482)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1700)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1010)
  • Respiratory Medicine (979)
  • Rheumatology (478)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (493)
  • Sports Medicine (424)
  • Surgery (545)
  • Toxicology (71)
  • Transplantation (235)
  • Urology (203)