Abstract
Background COVID-19 originated in China and has quickly spread worldwide causing a pandemic. Countries need rapid data on the prevalence of the virus in communities to enable rapid containment. However, the equipment, human and laboratory resources required for conducting individual RT-PCR is prohibitive. One technique to reduce the number of tests required is the pooling of samples for analysis by RT-PCR prior to testing.
Methods We conducted a mathematical analysis of pooling strategies for infection rate classification using group testing and for the identification of individuals by testing pooled clusters of samples.
Findings On the basis of the proposed pooled testing strategy we calculate the probability of false alarm, the probability of detection, and the average number of tests required as a function of the pool size. We find that when the sample size is 256, using a maximum pool size of 64, with only 7.3 tests on average, we can distinguish between prevalences of 1% and 5% with a probability of detection of 95% and probability of false alarm of 4%.
Interpretation The pooling of RT-PCR samples is a cost-effective technique for providing much-needed course-grained data on the prevalence of COVID-19. This is a powerful tool in providing countries with information that can facilitate a response to the pandemic that is evidence-based and saves the most lives possible with the resources available.
Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Authors contributions RL and KRN conceived the study. IF, KT, KRN, SB and RL all contributed to the writing of the manuscript and AH and JJ provided comments. KRN and AH conducted the analysis and designed the figures.
Evidence before this study The pooling of RT-PCR samples has been shown to be effective in screening for HIV, Chlamydia, Malaria, and influenza, among other pathogens in human health. In agriculture, this method has been used to assess the prevalence of many pathogens, including Dichelobacter nodosus, which causes footrot in sheep, postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome, and antibiotic resistance in swine feces, in addition to the identification of coronaviruses in multiple bat species. In relation to the current pandemic, researchers in multiple countries have begun to employ this technique to investigate samples for COVID-19.
Added value of this study Given recent interest in this topic, this study provides a mathematical analysis of infection rate classification using group testing and calculates the probability of false alarm, the probability of detection, and the average number of tests required as a function of the pool size. In addition the identification of individuals by pooled cluster testing is evaluated.
Implications of all the available evidence This research suggests the pooling of RT-PCR samples for testing can provide a cheap and effective way of gathering much needed data on the prevalence of COVID-19 and identifying infected individuals in the community, where it may be infeasible to carry out a high number of tests. This will enable countries to use stretched resources in the most appropriate way possible, providing valuable data that can inform an evidence-based response to the pandemic.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
N/A
