Abstract
Reflected pressure waves are key to the understanding of vascular aging, a prominent factor in major cardiovascular events. Several different metrics have been proposed to index the effect of wave reflection on the pressure waveform and thereby serve as an indicator of vascular aging. The extent to which these indices are influenced by factors other than vascular health remains a matter of concern. In this paper, we will first derive a mathematical model for the reflection time (Trefl), and the augmentation index (AI), assuming a general extended model of the arterial system. Then, we test our model against values reported in the literature. Finally, we discuss insights from the model to common observations in the literature such as age-related “shift” in the reflection site, the variation of AI with heart rate, and the flattening of Trefl in older participants. Our results indicate that although both Trefl and AI are affected by aging, the load properties are important factors to consider. Especially for Trefl, the delay caused at the load site can account for more than 50% of its value. The comparison between model outputs and reported values confirms the validity of the model. The proposed model describes how vascular parameters affect the reflection time and the augmentation index.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
NA
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
NA