Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Evaluation of Group Testing for SARS-CoV-2 RNA

View ORCID ProfileNasa Sinnott-Armstrong, Daniel L. Klein, Brendan Hickey
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.27.20043968
Nasa Sinnott-Armstrong
*Stanford University, Stanford, CA;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nasa Sinnott-Armstrong
  • For correspondence: nasa@stanford.edu nasa@stanford.edu
Daniel L. Klein
†Oracle Corporation, New York, NY;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: daniel.l.klein@oracle.com
Brendan Hickey
‡Google Inc., Cambridge, MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

During the current COVID-19 pandemic, testing kit and RNA extraction kit availability has become a major limiting factor in the ability to determine patient disease status and accurately quantify prevalence. Current testing strategies rely on individual tests of cases matching restrictive diagnostic criteria to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA, limiting testing of asymptomatic and mild cases. Testing these individuals is one effective way to understand and reduce the spread of COVID-19.

Here, we develop a pooled testing strategy to identify these low-risk individuals. Drawing on the well-studied group testing literature, modeling suggests practical changes to testing protocols which can reduce test costs and stretch a limited test kit supply. When most tests are negative, pooling reduces the total number of tests up to four-fold at 2% prevalence and eight-fold at 0.5% prevalence. At current SARS-CoV-2 prevalence, randomized group testing optimized per country could double the number of tested individuals from 1.85M to 3.7M using only 671k more tests.

This strategy is well-suited to supplement testing for asymptomatic and mild cases who would otherwise go untested, and enable them to adopt behavioral changes to slow the spread of COVID-19.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

N.S.-A. is funded by a Stanford Graduate Fellowship.

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

This is a work of secondary analysis and all data are available from other studies or websites. An interactive simulation framework derived from the work presented in this study is available at https://technopolymath.shinyapps.io/pooled_covid_testing/.

https://technopolymath.shinyapps.io/pooled_covid_testing/

https://ourworldindata.org/covid-testing

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted March 30, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of Group Testing for SARS-CoV-2 RNA
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Evaluation of Group Testing for SARS-CoV-2 RNA
Nasa Sinnott-Armstrong, Daniel L. Klein, Brendan Hickey
medRxiv 2020.03.27.20043968; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.27.20043968
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Evaluation of Group Testing for SARS-CoV-2 RNA
Nasa Sinnott-Armstrong, Daniel L. Klein, Brendan Hickey
medRxiv 2020.03.27.20043968; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.27.20043968

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (179)
  • Allergy and Immunology (431)
  • Anesthesia (99)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (943)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (178)
  • Dermatology (109)
  • Emergency Medicine (260)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (419)
  • Epidemiology (8971)
  • Forensic Medicine (4)
  • Gastroenterology (418)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (1938)
  • Geriatric Medicine (190)
  • Health Economics (400)
  • Health Informatics (1323)
  • Health Policy (657)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (517)
  • Hematology (212)
  • HIV/AIDS (416)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (10772)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (571)
  • Medical Education (200)
  • Medical Ethics (54)
  • Nephrology (221)
  • Neurology (1819)
  • Nursing (108)
  • Nutrition (271)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (351)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (469)
  • Oncology (992)
  • Ophthalmology (296)
  • Orthopedics (111)
  • Otolaryngology (182)
  • Pain Medicine (126)
  • Palliative Medicine (44)
  • Pathology (265)
  • Pediatrics (576)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (275)
  • Primary Care Research (234)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (1892)
  • Public and Global Health (4111)
  • Radiology and Imaging (674)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (364)
  • Respiratory Medicine (548)
  • Rheumatology (224)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (190)
  • Sports Medicine (177)
  • Surgery (207)
  • Toxicology (38)
  • Transplantation (109)
  • Urology (80)