Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Rational evaluation of various epidemic models based on the COVID-19 data of China

View ORCID ProfileWuyue Yang, Dongyan Zhang, View ORCID ProfileLiangrong Peng, View ORCID ProfileChangjing Zhuge, View ORCID ProfileLiu Hong
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.12.20034595
Wuyue Yang
1Zhou Pei-Yuan Center for Applied Mathematics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, P.R.C
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Wuyue Yang
Dongyan Zhang
2Beijing Institute for Scientific and Engineering Computing, College of Applied Sciences, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, P.R.C
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Liangrong Peng
3College of Mathematics and Data Science, Minjiang University, Fuzhou, 350108, P.R.C
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Liangrong Peng
Changjing Zhuge
2Beijing Institute for Scientific and Engineering Computing, College of Applied Sciences, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, P.R.C
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Changjing Zhuge
  • For correspondence: zcamhl@tsinghua.edu.cn zhuge@bjut.edu.cn
Liu Hong
1Zhou Pei-Yuan Center for Applied Mathematics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, P.R.C
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Liu Hong
  • For correspondence: zcamhl@tsinghua.edu.cn zhuge@bjut.edu.cn
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

During the study of epidemics, one of the most significant and also challenging problems is to forecast the future trends, on which all follow-up actions of individuals and governments heavily rely. However, to pick out a reliable predictable model/method is far from simple, a rational evaluation of various possible choices is eagerly needed, especially under the severe threat of COVID-19 epidemics which is spreading world-wide right now.

In this paper, based on the public COVID-19 data of seven provinces/cities in China reported during the spring of 2020, we make a systematical investigation on the forecast ability of eight widely used empirical functions, four statistical inference methods and five dynamical models widely used in the literature. We highlight the significance of a well balance between model complexity and accuracy, over-fitting and under-fitting, as well as model robustness and sensitivity. We further introduce the Akaike information criterion, root mean square errors and robustness index to quantify these three golden means and to evaluate various epidemic models/methods.

Through extensive simulations, we find that the inflection point plays a crucial role in the choice of the size of dataset in forecasting. Before the inflection point, no model considered here could make a reliable prediction. We further notice the Logistic function steadily underestimate the final epidemic size, while the Gomertz’s function makes an overestimation in all cases. Since the methods of sequential Bayesian and time-dependent reproduction number take the non-constant nature of the effective reproduction number with the progression of epidemics into consideration, we suggest to employ them especially in the late stage of an epidemic. The transition-like behavior of exponential growth method from underestimation to overestimation with respect to the inflection point might be useful for constructing a more reliable forecast. Towards the dynamical models based on ODEs, it is observed that the SEIR-QD and SEIR-PO models generally show a better performance than SIR, SEIR and SEIR-AHQ models on the COVID-19 epidemics, whose success could be attributed to the inclusion of self-protection and quarantine, and a proper trade-off between model complexity and fitting accuracy.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The authors acknowledged the financial supports from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants No. 21877070, 11801020), Startup Research Funding of Minjiang University (mjy19033) and Special Pre-research Project of Beijing University of Technology for Fighting the Outbreak of Epidemics.

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

This work used only public data.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted March 16, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Rational evaluation of various epidemic models based on the COVID-19 data of China
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Rational evaluation of various epidemic models based on the COVID-19 data of China
Wuyue Yang, Dongyan Zhang, Liangrong Peng, Changjing Zhuge, Liu Hong
medRxiv 2020.03.12.20034595; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.12.20034595
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Rational evaluation of various epidemic models based on the COVID-19 data of China
Wuyue Yang, Dongyan Zhang, Liangrong Peng, Changjing Zhuge, Liu Hong
medRxiv 2020.03.12.20034595; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.12.20034595

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (180)
  • Allergy and Immunology (434)
  • Anesthesia (99)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (949)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (178)
  • Dermatology (111)
  • Emergency Medicine (260)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (423)
  • Epidemiology (9003)
  • Forensic Medicine (4)
  • Gastroenterology (421)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (1962)
  • Geriatric Medicine (191)
  • Health Economics (405)
  • Health Informatics (1330)
  • Health Policy (662)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (520)
  • Hematology (212)
  • HIV/AIDS (420)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (10826)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (575)
  • Medical Education (200)
  • Medical Ethics (54)
  • Nephrology (222)
  • Neurology (1837)
  • Nursing (110)
  • Nutrition (274)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (356)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (470)
  • Oncology (1003)
  • Ophthalmology (299)
  • Orthopedics (111)
  • Otolaryngology (183)
  • Pain Medicine (126)
  • Palliative Medicine (44)
  • Pathology (265)
  • Pediatrics (582)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (276)
  • Primary Care Research (234)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (1910)
  • Public and Global Health (4133)
  • Radiology and Imaging (676)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (370)
  • Respiratory Medicine (551)
  • Rheumatology (226)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (191)
  • Sports Medicine (178)
  • Surgery (207)
  • Toxicology (39)
  • Transplantation (109)
  • Urology (82)