Abstract
Functional outcomes and patient satisfaction following short length of stay (LoS) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the regional context have not been explored. This study aimed to report on complications, functional outcomes and satisfaction of patients discharged from acute (≤2 days) stay, up to 6 weeks after TKA in a regional hospital.
Patients were prospectively recruited from August 2018 to August 2019. Demographic data, intraoperative factors and the incidence of complications and emergency department (ED) presentations were retrieved from hospital records. Preoperative and 6 weeks postoperative assessments collected range of motion (ROM), timed up and go (TUG), 6 minute walk test (6MWT) and total Oxford knee score (OKS), with patient satisfaction assessed at follow-up via a questionnaire. A directed acyclic graph approach was used to perform logistic and linear regression to assess relationships between patient and treatment characteristics with short-term outcomes.
Median LoS for the period was 2 days, influenced by age, gender, bilateral status and body mass index. A shorter LoS was significantly associated with functional outcomes and patient satisfaction, with 74.4% of patients satisfied with their knee and 88.4% satisfied with their LoS. At six weeks, significant improvements in all scores were found, however only the change in OKS exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) threshold. Patient satisfaction correlated with change in TUG exceeding MCID. Complications at 6 weeks post surgery were affected by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status, marriage status, smoking history, history of chronic pain and mental health conditions, and the number of ED presentations was associated with preoperative TUG and comorbidities.
The findings establish that short LoS after TKA in a regional hospital is associated with good outcomes and a high patient satisfaction, but patient factors and comorbidities associated with an increased risk of complications and ED presentations should be considered for postoperative management and patient care.
Competing Interest Statement
ME and CS hold shares in EBM Analytics. No other authors have competing interests to disclose.
Clinical Trial
The study was not registered because it is not an interventional study.
Funding Statement
MF, ME and CS were comissioned by the senior author (SM) for assistance with study design, statistical analysis and manuscript preparation.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Blinded data may be requested from the corresponding author subject to reasonable use.