Abstract
Objectives The pericardial fat represents a powerful (promising) index which has been seen to correlate with several cardiovascular events. We propose a novel approach to automatically measure it from CT scans and we seek to explore how it is distributed in a study population.
Methods We studied a population of 1528 patients where 47 (3%) showed a cardiac event. The fat segmentation model was based on a deep neural network to identify the heart and from it, the pericardial fat was extract by threshold. Statistical analysis was finally computed to stratify the population according the quantity of pericardial fat.
Results The high segmentation quality was reported with a Dice index (92.5%) and a Pearson coefficient (0.990, p<0.001). Notably, normalized pericardial fat volume was significantly higher in patients with cardiac event (73.46±30.84 vs 60.06±25.38 cm3/m2, p=0.005) with a AUC of 63,44% for discrimination of cardiac event.
Conclusions The proposed approach reached accurate and fast performance for the evaluation of the pericardial fat making it reliable for a population analysis.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Protocols
Funding Statement
No external funding was received
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
contact to: dellalatta{at}ftgm.it
Data Availability
The dataset analysed during the current study is not publicly available but is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
