Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Virtual reality telerehabilitation for spatial neglect post-stroke: perspectives from stroke survivors, carers and clinicians

Helen Morse, View ORCID ProfileLaura Biggart, View ORCID ProfileValerie Pomeroy, View ORCID ProfileStéphanie Rossit
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.07.20016782
Helen Morse
aSchool of Psychology, University of East Anglia, Norwich UK
bAcquired Brain Injury Rehabilitaion Alliance, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laura Biggart
aSchool of Psychology, University of East Anglia, Norwich UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Laura Biggart
Valerie Pomeroy
bAcquired Brain Injury Rehabilitaion Alliance, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
cSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Valerie Pomeroy
Stéphanie Rossit
aSchool of Psychology, University of East Anglia, Norwich UK
bAcquired Brain Injury Rehabilitaion Alliance, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Stéphanie Rossit
  • For correspondence: s.rossit@uea.ac.uk
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Spatial neglect is a common and severe cognitive consequence of stroke, yet there is currently no effective rehabilitation tool. Virtual Reality (VR) telerehabilitation tools have the potential to provide multisensory and enjoyable neuropsychological therapies and remotely monitor adherence without the presence of a therapist at all times. In order to inform the development of these tools researchers and industry need to better understand end-user perspectives about these technologies to ensure these are acceptable and user-friendly to ultimately optimize adherence and efficacy. Therefore, this study explored end-user perspectives on the use of self-administered VR telerehabilitation for spatial neglect. We used a mixed-method design including focus groups, self-administered questionnaires and individual interviews with stroke survivors (N = 7), their carers (N = 3) and stroke clinicians (N = 6). End-user perspectives identified clarity of instructions, equipment (cost, available resources) and for some, level of experience with technology as barriers of use. Perceived facilitators of use were performance feedback, engagement and enjoyment, and psychological benefits associated by self-administered VR telerehabilitation. Overall, end-users were positive and interested in using VR telerehabilitation for spatial neglect. These perspectives enabled us to produce practical recommendations to inform future development, enhance engagement and uptake of self-administered VR telerehabilitation.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

Not a clinical trial

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the University of East Anglia Innovation Proof-of-Concept Fund 2017-2018

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

N/A

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 10, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Virtual reality telerehabilitation for spatial neglect post-stroke: perspectives from stroke survivors, carers and clinicians
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Virtual reality telerehabilitation for spatial neglect post-stroke: perspectives from stroke survivors, carers and clinicians
Helen Morse, Laura Biggart, Valerie Pomeroy, Stéphanie Rossit
medRxiv 2020.01.07.20016782; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.07.20016782
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Virtual reality telerehabilitation for spatial neglect post-stroke: perspectives from stroke survivors, carers and clinicians
Helen Morse, Laura Biggart, Valerie Pomeroy, Stéphanie Rossit
medRxiv 2020.01.07.20016782; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.07.20016782

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (228)
  • Allergy and Immunology (506)
  • Anesthesia (110)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1245)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (206)
  • Dermatology (147)
  • Emergency Medicine (282)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (534)
  • Epidemiology (10032)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (500)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2467)
  • Geriatric Medicine (238)
  • Health Economics (480)
  • Health Informatics (1647)
  • Health Policy (754)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (637)
  • Hematology (250)
  • HIV/AIDS (536)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11872)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (626)
  • Medical Education (253)
  • Medical Ethics (75)
  • Nephrology (268)
  • Neurology (2290)
  • Nursing (139)
  • Nutrition (352)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (454)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (537)
  • Oncology (1249)
  • Ophthalmology (377)
  • Orthopedics (134)
  • Otolaryngology (226)
  • Pain Medicine (158)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (325)
  • Pediatrics (734)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (315)
  • Primary Care Research (282)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2281)
  • Public and Global Health (4844)
  • Radiology and Imaging (843)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (492)
  • Respiratory Medicine (652)
  • Rheumatology (286)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (241)
  • Sports Medicine (227)
  • Surgery (269)
  • Toxicology (44)
  • Transplantation (125)
  • Urology (99)