Abstract
Dyslexia is currently thought to be based on poor phonological processing. We investigated neural speech-sound discrimination in adults with or without dyslexia by recording mismatch fields (MMF) with magnetoencephalogram (MEG) and by determining their association with reading-related skills. We expected weak and atypically lateralized MMFs in dyslexics, and associations between reading-related skills and MMF strength. Responses were recorded to a repeating pseudoword /ta-ta/ with occasional changes in vowel identity, vowel duration, or syllable frequency from 43 adults, 21 with confirmed dyslexia. Phonological processing, reading, working memory, and IQ were additionally assessed. Speech-sound changes elicited MMFs and late MMFs in bilateral auditory cortices, with no group differences in source strengths. MMFs and/or late MMFs to vowel identity and duration changes were left-lateralized. Better verbal working memory was associated with stronger left-hemispheric MMF sources across groups, suggesting the relevance of verbal working memory for speech processing. Faster and more accurate technical reading was associated with stronger right-hemispheric MMF sources in dyslexics, which might suggest a right-hemispheric compensatory mechanism for language processing. In conclusion, contrary to prior work, our results did not support deficient speech-sound processing in dyslexia. However, in line with previous studies, we showed left-lateralized MMFs to speech sound changes and their association with reading-related skills, promoting the use of MMFs in investigating reading-related brain processes.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
NCT02622360
Funding Statement
The project was funded by Jane and Aatos Erkko foundation, Academy of Finland [project numbers 2764141 and 316970], KELA (The Finnish Social Insurance Institution), and University of Helsinki MRI measurement support. The first author was supported by the University of Helsinki Research Foundation and Arvo and Lea Ylppö foundation.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The code used for the analysis of this dataset is available.