Abstract
Aims To investigate the effect of serum urate on blood pressure and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk by updating evidence from Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Methods and Results Using recently available data from the Million Veterans Program and UK Biobank, the main MR analyses showed that every 1-standard deviation increase in genetically predicted serum urate was associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease (odds ratio 1.19, 95% confidence interval 1.10-1.30, P=4×10−5), peripheral artery disease (1.12, 95%CI 1.03 to 1.21, P=9×10−3), and stroke (1.11, 95%CI 1.05 to 1.18, P=2×10−4). In MR mediation analyses, SBP was estimated to mediate approximately one third the effect of urate on CVD risk. Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs showed a favorable effect of urate-lowering treatment on SBP (mean difference -2.55mmHg, 95%CI -4.06 to -1.05, P=1×10−3) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in those with previous CVD (OR 0.40, 95%CI 0.22 to 0.73, P=3×10−3), but no significant effect on MACE in all individuals (OR 0.73, 95%CI 0.48 to 1.09, P=0.12).
Conclusion MR and clinical trial data support an effect of higher serum urate on increasing blood pressure, which may mediate a consequent effect on CVD risk. High-quality trials are necessary to provide definitive evidence on the specific clinical contexts where urate-lowering may be of cardiovascular benefit.
Competing Interest Statement
DG is employed part-time by Novo Nordisk. JD and TQ have received charitable research income to conduct clinical trials of allopurinol use in people with stroke. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by funding from the US Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Research and Development, Million Veteran Program Grant MVP003 (I01-BX003362). This publication does not represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs of the US Government. DG is funded by the Wellcome 4i Clinical PhD Program at Imperial College London (203928/Z/16/Z). VK is funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant (721567). PE acknowledges support from the Medical Research Council (MR/S019669/1), the National Institute for Health Research Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, Imperial College London (RDF03), the UK Dementia Research Institute (DRI) at Imperial College London funded by UK DRI Ltd (funded by Medical Research Council, Alzheimer’s Society, Alzheimer’s Research UK), and Health Data Research (HDR) UK London funded by HDR UK Ltd (funded by a consortium led by the Medical Research Council 1004231). SMD was supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Research and Development (IK2-CX001780). ET is funded by a Cancer Research UK Career Development Fellowship (C31250/A22804). The MEGASTROKE project received funding from sources specified at http://www.megastroke.org/acknowledgments.html. Details of all MEGASTROKE authors are available at http://www.megastroke.org/authors.html.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data used in this work are either publicly accessible or available on request from their original studies, which obtained appropriate patient consent and ethical approval. The UK Biobank data were accessed through application 236. All results generated in this work are presented in either the manuscript or its supplementary files.