Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Making densenet interpretable a case study in clinical radiology

Kwun Ho Ngan, Artur d’Avila Garcez, Karen M. Knapp, Andy Appelboam, Constantino Carlos Reyes-Aldasoro
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/19013730
Kwun Ho Ngan
⋆School of Mathematics, Computer Science and Engineering City, University of London, London, EC1V 0HB, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: kwun-ho.ngan@city.ac.uk
Artur d’Avila Garcez
⋆School of Mathematics, Computer Science and Engineering City, University of London, London, EC1V 0HB, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karen M. Knapp
†College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Science, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QJ, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andy Appelboam
‡Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Barrack Road, Exeter, EX2 5DW, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Constantino Carlos Reyes-Aldasoro
⋆School of Mathematics, Computer Science and Engineering City, University of London, London, EC1V 0HB, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The monotonous routine of medical image analysis under tight time constraints has always led to work fatigue for many medical practitioners. Medical image interpretation can be error-prone and this can increase the risk of an incorrect procedure being recommended. While the advancement of complex deep learning models has achieved performance beyond human capability in some computer vision tasks, widespread adoption in the medical field has been held back, among other factors, by poor model interpretability and a lack of high-quality labelled data. This paper introduces a model interpretation and visualisation framework for the analysis of the feature extraction process of a deep convolutional neural network and applies it to abnormality detection using the musculoskeletal radiograph dataset (MURA, Stanford). The proposed framework provides a mechanism for interpreting DenseNet deep learning architectures. It aims to provide a deeper insight about the paths of feature generation and reasoning within a DenseNet architecture. When evaluated on MURA at abnormality detection tasks, the model interpretation framework has been shown capable of identifying limitations in the reasoning of a DenseNet architecture applied to radiography, which can in turn be ameliorated through model interpretation and visualization.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

No external funding

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data used in this paper is collected from the publicly available MURA dataset (https://stanfordmlgroup.github.io/competitions/mura/) with permitted use from the data maintainer. No other data has been made available.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 05, 2019.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Making densenet interpretable a case study in clinical radiology
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Making densenet interpretable a case study in clinical radiology
Kwun Ho Ngan, Artur d’Avila Garcez, Karen M. Knapp, Andy Appelboam, Constantino Carlos Reyes-Aldasoro
medRxiv 19013730; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/19013730
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Making densenet interpretable a case study in clinical radiology
Kwun Ho Ngan, Artur d’Avila Garcez, Karen M. Knapp, Andy Appelboam, Constantino Carlos Reyes-Aldasoro
medRxiv 19013730; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/19013730

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Radiology and Imaging
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (174)
  • Allergy and Immunology (419)
  • Anesthesia (97)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (894)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (166)
  • Dermatology (101)
  • Emergency Medicine (257)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (404)
  • Epidemiology (8744)
  • Forensic Medicine (4)
  • Gastroenterology (403)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (1845)
  • Geriatric Medicine (175)
  • Health Economics (386)
  • Health Informatics (1281)
  • Health Policy (642)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (489)
  • Hematology (206)
  • HIV/AIDS (387)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (10520)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (564)
  • Medical Education (193)
  • Medical Ethics (52)
  • Nephrology (216)
  • Neurology (1744)
  • Nursing (100)
  • Nutrition (264)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (342)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (457)
  • Oncology (959)
  • Ophthalmology (279)
  • Orthopedics (107)
  • Otolaryngology (174)
  • Pain Medicine (117)
  • Palliative Medicine (41)
  • Pathology (262)
  • Pediatrics (553)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (264)
  • Primary Care Research (218)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (1836)
  • Public and Global Health (3963)
  • Radiology and Imaging (649)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (340)
  • Respiratory Medicine (532)
  • Rheumatology (214)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (178)
  • Sports Medicine (165)
  • Surgery (196)
  • Toxicology (37)
  • Transplantation (105)
  • Urology (78)