Abstract
Background Tests of binocular vision (BVTs) and ocular motility are used in concussion assessment and management.
Purpose To determine the one-week test-retest reliability of 9 binocular vision tests (BVTs) and a test of saccades proposed for use in concussion management.
Study Design Prospective test-retest.
Methods We examined the one-week test-retest reliability of 9 BVTs in healthy participants: 3D vision (gross stereoscopic acuity), phoria at 30cm and 3m, ability of eyes to move/fixate in-sync (positive and negative fusional vergence at 30cm and 3m, near point of convergence and near point of convergence – break [i.e. double vision]) and 1 ocular motor test, saccades.
Results We tested 10 males and 10 females without concussion and a mean age of 25.5 (4.1) years. The intraclass correlations suggest good reliability for phoria 3m (0.88) and gross stereoscopic acuity (0.86), and moderate reliability for phoria 30cm (0.69), near point of convergence (0.54), positive fusional vergence (0.54) and negative fusional vergence (0.66) at 30cm, and near point of convergence - break (0.64). There was poor reliability for saccades (0.34), and both positive and negative fusional vergence (0.49 and 0.43, respectively) at 3m. Limits of agreement (LoA) were best for saccade (±34%) and worst for phoria 30 cm (±121%) and ranged from ±58% to ±70% for 7 of the 8 other tests. The LoA for phoria at 3m were uninformative because measurements for 18 of 20 participants were identical.
Conclusion We found test-retest reliability of the BVTs and saccades ranging from poor to good in healthy participants, with the majority being moderate.
Clinical Relevance For these vision tests to be clinically useful, the effect of concussion must have a moderate to large effect on the scores of most of the tests.
What is known about the subject
Concussions may affect some parts of visual function
1-week test-retest reliability for most visual tests is under-studied
What this study adds to existing knowledge
We provide intra-class coefficients and limits of agreement for 10 different visual function tests commonly conducted by clinicians in patients with concussion.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded through programs designed to foster collaboration between academics and industry. The government sources are the MITACS program, and the MEDTEQ program. The industry partners were Apexk Inc, Varitron Technologies Inc and l’Institut National du Sport du Quebec.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The raw data on the test-retest scores used in these analyses is available on the Open Science Foundation (https://osf.io/nbskx/wiki/home/).
