Abstract
Background Some conditions - such as obesity, depression and functional odor disorders - come with a social stigma. Understanding the etiology of these conditions helps to avoid stereotypes and find remedies. One of the major obstacles facing researchers, especially for those studying socially distressing metabolic malodor, is the difficulty in assembling biologically homogenous study cohorts.
Objective The aim of this study was to examine phenotypic variance, self-reported data and laboratory tests for the purpose of identifying clinically relevant and etiologically meaningful subtypes of idiopathic body odor and the “People are Allergic To Me” (PATM) syndrome.
Methods Participants with undiagnosed body odor conditions enrolled to participate in this research study initiated by a healthcare charity MEBO Research and sponsored by Wishart Research group at the Metabolomics Innovation Centre, University of Alberta, Canada. Primary outcomes were differences in metabolite concentrations measured in urine, blood and breath of test and control groups. Principal component analyses and other statistical tests were carried out for these measurements.
Results While neither of existing laboratory tests could reliably predict chronic malodor symptoms, several measurements distinguished phenotypes at a significance level less than 5%. Types of malodor can be differentiated by self-reported consumption of (or sensitivity to) added sugars (p<0.01), blood alcohols after glucose challenge (especially ethanol: p<0.0005), urinary excretion of phenylalanine, putrescine, and combinations of blood or urine metabolites.
Conclusions Our preliminary results suggest that malodor heterogeneity can be addressed by analyses of phenotypes based on patients’ dietary and olfactory observations. Our studies highlight the need for more trials. Future research focused on comprehensive metabolomics and microbiome sequencing will play an important role in the diagnosis and treatment of malodor.
Trial Registration The study discussed in the manuscript was registered as NCT02692495 at clinicaltrials.gov. The results were compared with our earlier study registered as NCT02683876.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
NCT02683876
Funding Statement
No external funding was received.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
Any clinical trials involved have been registered with an ICMJE-approved registry such as ClinicalTrials.gov and the trial ID is included in the manuscript.
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant Equator, ICMJE or other checklist(s) as supplementary files, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Footnotes
Competing interest statement: The author has declared that no competing interests exist.