Abstract
Objective Auditory brainstem response (ABR) is widely employed to assess auditory function of humans and lab animals. Despite attempts to automation, ABR threshold determination still relies on human visual inspection on average responses. The aim of this study is to develop a robust procedure for automatic and accurate threshold determination.
Design Signal lag of maximal cross-covariance between sub-averaged sweeps was utilized to test the existence of time-locked components during progressive averaging by iterations. The minimal number of iterations required to reach the critical lag value versus sound level series was modeled to inform the estimation of ABR threshold.
Study Sample Test datasets containing single ABR sweeps were acquired from eight mice and four human participants.
Results To reach the critical lag value, weak responses at near-threshold levels required more sweep averaging than strong responses at supra-threshold levels, allowing precise and robust determination of the ABR threshold. Moreover, by contrast to level averaging over fixed sweep number the algorithm saved up to 69 % and 36 % sweeps at supra-threshold sound levels for the threshold determination in mice and humans, respectively.
Conclusion Implementation of this method in commercial devices will automate the ABR test in a more reliable and efficient fashion.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
SH9H-2019-T79-1
Funding Statement
This study was supported by The Program for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning (QD2018015 to Y.H.), Elite Program at Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital (JY201802 to Y.H., Z.H.), The National Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China (81800901 to Y.H., 81700903 to B.L) and SHIPM-mu Fund (JC201808 to B.L.).
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
Any clinical trials involved have been registered with an ICMJE-approved registry such as ClinicalTrials.gov and the trial ID is included in the manuscript.
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant Equator, ICMJE or other checklist(s) as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data referred to in the manuscript are available.