Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Bias correction methods for test-negative designs in the presence of misclassification

View ORCID ProfileAkira Endo, View ORCID ProfileSebastian Funk, Adam J. Kucharski
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/19002691
Akira Endo
1Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Keppel St., London WC1E 7HT, The United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Akira Endo
  • For correspondence: akira.endo@lshtm.ac.uk
Sebastian Funk
1Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Keppel St., London WC1E 7HT, The United Kingdom
2Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Keppel St., London WC1E 7HT, The United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sebastian Funk
Adam J. Kucharski
1Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Keppel St., London WC1E 7HT, The United Kingdom
2Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Keppel St., London WC1E 7HT, The United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

The test-negative design has become a standard approach for vaccine effectiveness studies. However, previous studies suggested that it may be more sensitive than other designs to misclassification of disease outcome caused by imperfect diagnostic tests. This could be a particular limitation in vaccine effectiveness studies where simple tests (e.g. rapid influenza diagnostic tests) are used for logistical convenience. To address this issue, we derived a mathematical representation of the test-negative design with imperfect tests, then developed a bias correction framework for possible misclassification. Test-negative design studies usually include multiple covariates other than vaccine history to adjust potential confounders; our methods can also address multivariate analyses and be easily coupled with existing estimation tools. We validated the performance of these methods using simulations of common scenarios for vaccine efficacy and were able to obtain unbiased estimates in a variety of parameter settings.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The authors received no funding for the submitted work.

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Not Applicable

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Not Applicable

Any clinical trials involved have been registered with an ICMJE-approved registry such as ClinicalTrials.gov and the trial ID is included in the manuscript.

Not Applicable

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant Equator, ICMJE or other checklist(s) as supplementary files, if applicable.

Not Applicable

Data Availability

The study used simulated data only. The code used to generate the data is reposited online (https://github.com/akira-endo/TND-biascorrection/)

https://github.com/akira-endo/TND-biascorrection/

  • Abbreviations

    VE
    vaccine effectiveness
    TND
    test-negative design
    TD
    target disease
    ND
    non-target disease
    PCR
    polymerase chain reaction
    MLE
    maximum likelihood estimate
    MO
    multiple overimputation
    EM
    expectation-maximisation.
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted July 20, 2019.
    Download PDF

    Supplementary Material

    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Bias correction methods for test-negative designs in the presence of misclassification
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Bias correction methods for test-negative designs in the presence of misclassification
    Akira Endo, Sebastian Funk, Adam J. Kucharski
    medRxiv 19002691; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/19002691
    Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Bias correction methods for test-negative designs in the presence of misclassification
    Akira Endo, Sebastian Funk, Adam J. Kucharski
    medRxiv 19002691; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/19002691

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Epidemiology
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (70)
    • Allergy and Immunology (168)
    • Anesthesia (51)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (453)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (83)
    • Dermatology (55)
    • Emergency Medicine (158)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (191)
    • Epidemiology (5275)
    • Forensic Medicine (3)
    • Gastroenterology (197)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (759)
    • Geriatric Medicine (80)
    • Health Economics (213)
    • Health Informatics (700)
    • Health Policy (361)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (224)
    • Hematology (99)
    • HIV/AIDS (164)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (5904)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (363)
    • Medical Education (105)
    • Medical Ethics (25)
    • Nephrology (83)
    • Neurology (769)
    • Nursing (43)
    • Nutrition (132)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (144)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (234)
    • Oncology (481)
    • Ophthalmology (152)
    • Orthopedics (39)
    • Otolaryngology (95)
    • Pain Medicine (39)
    • Palliative Medicine (20)
    • Pathology (141)
    • Pediatrics (223)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (136)
    • Primary Care Research (99)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (865)
    • Public and Global Health (2028)
    • Radiology and Imaging (350)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (158)
    • Respiratory Medicine (287)
    • Rheumatology (94)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (74)
    • Sports Medicine (77)
    • Surgery (110)
    • Toxicology (25)
    • Transplantation (29)
    • Urology (39)