STRUCTURED ABSTRACT
Background The global morbidity and mortality burden of COVID-19 has been substantial, often widening pre-existing inequalities. The approved COVID-19 vaccines have shown great promise in reducing disease transmission and severity of outcomes. However, the success of the COVID-19 vaccine rollout is dependent on public acceptance and willingness to be vaccinated. In this study, we aim to examine how the attitude towards public sector officials and the government impact vaccine willingness with a secondary aim to understand the impact of ethnicity on this relationship.
Methods This cross-sectional study used data from a UK population based longitudinal household survey (Understanding Society COVID-19 study, Understanding Society: the UK Household Longitudinal Study) between April 2020-January 2021. Data from 22421 participants in Waves 6 and 7 of the study were included after excluding missing data. Demographic details in addition to previous survey responses relating to public sector/governmental trust were included in as covariates in the main analyses. A logit model was produced to describe the association between public sector/governmental mistrust and the willingness for vaccination with interaction terms included to account for ethnicity/socio-economic status.
Findings In support of existing literature, we identified those from BAME groups were more likely to be unwilling to take the COVID-19 vaccine. We found that positive opinions towards public sector officials (OR 2.680: 95% CI 1.888 – 3.805) and the UK government (OR 3.400; 95% CI 2.454 - 4.712) led to substantive increase in vaccine willingness. Most notably we identified this effect to be vary across ethnicity and socio-economic status with those from South Asian background (OR 4.513; 95% CI 1.012 - 20.123) the most unwilling to be vaccinated when their trust in public sector officials were affected.
Interpretation These findings suggests that trust in public sector officials may play a key factor in the low vaccination rates particularly seen in at risk groups. Given the additional morbidity/mortality risk posed by COVID-19 to those from lower socio-economic or ethnic minority backgrounds, there needs to be urgent public health action to review how to tailor health promotion advice given to these groups and examine methods to improve trust in public sector officials and the Government.
Funding No funding
Evidence before this study A systematic literature search on Pubmed and MedRxiv from database inception to 2nd July 2021 was conducted. The broad terms included were “COVID” OR “SARS-CoV-2*” AND “hesitancy” OR “willingness.” There were no age or language restrictions. We identified numerous observational studies examining prevalence of willingness and hesitancy towards taking the vaccine in a variety of global settings. However, there were fewer studies which examined the reasons behind decisions relating to vaccine hesitancy and in particular in communities relevant to those most at risk in the United Kingdom.
Added value of this study To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to exploring the role of trust in the public sector officials and in the Government with UK COVID-19 vaccination willingness. We found that negative pre-existing opinions around public sector/Government significantly reduced vaccine willingness with an increased effect size noted in those from lower socio-economic and BAME backgrounds.
Implications of all the available evidence Our findings support pre-existing prevalence data suggesting a reduced willingness for vaccination in lower socio-economic/BAME communities. However, our findings build on existing literature by suggesting that trust in public sector officials may play a key factor in the low vaccination rates. Given the additional morbidity/mortality risk posed by COVID-19 to those from lower socio-economic or ethnic minority backgrounds there needs to be urgent public health action to review how to tailor health promotion advice given to these groups and examine methods to improve trust in public sector officials and the Government.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics approval was granted by the University of Essex Ethics Committee for the COVID19 surveys (ETH1920-1271). No additional ethical approval was necessary for this secondary data analysis.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Declaration of Interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work, no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years, no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Ethics approval: Ethics approval was granted by the University of Essex Ethics Committee for the COVID19 surveys (ETH1920-1271). No additional ethical approval was necessary for this secondary data analysis.
Data Availability
The data is publicly available from the link provided