Abstract
Objective. Persistent, distressing psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) are associated with neurobiological alterations and increased psychosis risk. We combined individual-level neuroimaging measures with effect sizes from large neuroimaging studies to create a summary score ('Psychosis Neuroscore') reflecting neuroanatomic liability for psychosis, and examined its ability to predict PLE trajectories in young adolescents. Method. Using latent growth mixture models, we estimated PLE trajectories from four annual visits of the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study (N=9584, ages 9-10 at baseline). Using baseline T1-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging data, we calculated Psychosis Neuroscores, as well as Neuroscores for two psychiatric disorders with late adolescent/adult onset (Major Depressive Disorder, Bipolar Disorder). We compared Psychosis Neuroscores to i) other psychiatric Neuroscores, ii) modifiable risk factors, and iii) established risk factors in predicting trajectory membership. Results. We identified four trajectories of distressing PLEs: Persistent Elevated (N=1,968, 21%), Gradual Decreasing (N=3,424, 36%), Rapid Decreasing (N=1,593, 17%) and Low/No Distress (N=2,599, 27%). Adolescents with Persistent Elevated PLEs had significantly higher Multimodal (combined T1 and diffusion-weighted) and T1-weighted Psychosis Neuroscores than all other trajectories (Odds Ratios [ORs] 1.27-1.34,pFDR<.01). Bipolar Disorder Neuroscores showed a similar pattern (ORs 1.16-1.23,pFDR<.01). Psychosis Neuroscores showed comparable associations with established risk factors in predicting trajectory membership, but smaller associations than modifiable risk factors, including screen time, physical activity, and sleep disturbances. Conclusion. Psychosis Neuroscores differentiate youth with persistent PLEs from those with decreasing, remitting or low PLEs, demonstrating their potential utility for early risk stratification. Integration with established risk factors may enhance psychosis risk prediction in youth.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
IRB of University of California, San Diego gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data from this study are available via the NIH Brain Development Cohorts Data Hub. Researchers can apply to use this data at https://www.nbdc-datahub.org/.
Funder Information Declared
