Abstract
Background Preserving muscle function is essential for maintaining independence during aging, but muscle force-generating capacity is not commonly measured clinically due to a lack of accessible, sensitive tools. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides gold-standard measures of muscle volume and microstructure, which reflect force-generating capacity, while dynamometry quantifies peak joint moments during voluntary contraction. Both modalities are time-consuming and costly, so clinical and large-scale studies often rely on low-fidelity measures such as the time to complete the five times sit-to-stand test (5xSTS). OpenCap, a tool for quantifying musculoskeletal dynamics from smartphone videos, may provide an accessible and more informative approach to assessing muscle function. We evaluated whether OpenCap-derived knee extension moments during chair rise relate to MRI-based measures of quadriceps muscle volume and microstructure, using dynamometry as a comparator.
Methods Nineteen healthy adults of various ages (63.2% female, 57.8 ± 15.4 y, 30–78 y) underwent quadriceps MRI, dynamometry, and 5xSTS time with concurrent OpenCap data collection. Using MRI, we computed quadriceps volume and radial diffusivity (a measure related to fiber size). We standardized these features and summed to create a composite MRI score, reflecting muscle quantity and quality. We estimated peak knee extension moment using OpenCap during chair rise and via both isometric and isokinetic dynamometry. We compared OpenCap kinematics (torso angle) and dynamics (knee moment), 5xSTS time, and dynamometry to MRI measures of muscle function using linear regression; false discovery rate was controlled using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure.
Results The OpenCap-derived knee extension moment was associated with quadriceps muscle volume (r=0.63, p=0.014) and radial diffusivity (r=0.61, p=0.016). Peak knee extension moments measured by both isometric and isokinetic dynamometry were correlated with muscle volume (r=0.66–0.75, p=0.002–0.009), but not with radial diffusivity (r=0.04–0.52, p=0.054–0.91). Both OpenCap and isokinetic dynamometry showed their strongest associations with the composite MRI score (r=0.77, p=0.002 and r=0.73, p=0.002, respectively). 5xSTS time and a kinematic feature (torso angle) were not associated with any MRI-derived measures (r=−0.16–0.35, p=0.22–0.97).
Conclusions Smartphone video–based joint moments associate with muscle size and microstructure, unlike time or kinematic features. OpenCap offers a scalable assessment of muscle force-generating capacity that can be conducted rapidly without specialized equipment, enabling higher-fidelity assessments of muscle function in the clinic and in large-scale studies where imaging and dynamometry are impractical.
Competing Interest Statement
SDU is a co-founder of Model Health, Inc., which provides markerless motion capture technology for commercial, non-academic use. All data presented here is from the open-source OpenCap platform that is freely available for academic research. All software and algorithms in this paper are similarly made open source and freely available (github.com/rdmagruder/mri-aging). Model Health Inc. and the funding sources played no role in study design; data collection, analysis, or interpretation; the decision to publish; or the preparation of the manuscript.
Funding Statement
This research was supported by grants from the Myotonic Dystrophy Foundation, the Wu Tsai Human Performance Alliance, and the National Institutes of Health (K99/R00 AG071735, P50HD118632, P2CHD101913, and P41EB027060).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
IRB of Stanford University gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Quality of figures was improved; no changes to content.
Data Availability
All data presented here is from the open-source OpenCap platform that is freely available for academic research. All software and algorithms in this paper are similarly made open source and freely available (github.com/rdmagruder/mri-aging).
