Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Computational Review of Technology-Assisted Medical Evidence Synthesis through Human-LLM Collaboration: A Case Study of Cochrane

Yiping Ding, View ORCID ProfileXiaorui Jiang, Opeoluwa Akinseloyin
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.11.08.25339805
Yiping Ding
1School of Information, Journalism and Communication, University of Sheffield, 2 Whitham Road, Sheffield, S2 10AH, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiaorui Jiang
1School of Information, Journalism and Communication, University of Sheffield, 2 Whitham Road, Sheffield, S2 10AH, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Xiaorui Jiang
  • For correspondence: xiaorui.jiang{at}sheffield.ac.uk
Opeoluwa Akinseloyin
2Centre for Computational Sciences and Mathematical Modelling, Coventry University, Puma Way, Coventry, CV1 2TT, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Medical evidence synthesis, typically done by systematic reviews, requires extensive manual effort across stages such as searching, screening, extraction, and synthesis, making them slow and costly. These limitations hinder timely updates and rapid responses during health crises. Interests in technology-assisted evidence synthesis have been increasing, driven by artificial intelligence (AI) and large language models (LLMs). In 2024, four major networks including the Cochrane, Campbell Collaboration, Joanna Briggs Institute and Collaboration for Environmental Evidence jointly launched an AI Methods Group to advance automation in evidence synthesis. This chapter presents a large-scale computational analysis of technology-assisted MES across 7,271 Cochrane reviews (2010– 2024), identifying computer tools—software, packages, or algorithmic implementations—used at different review stages via an LLM-human collaborative annotation pipeline. A multi-LLM mechanism combining suggestion, verification, and self-critical questioning achieved high-recall tool extraction. Evaluation against five “gold-standard” tool lists showed major gains: approximately 100 additional tools were identified compared to each existing review-based, database-based, and Cochrane-curated gold standards. Eventually, a list of in total 514 tools was compiled. Two annotators verified all candidates within two days, demonstrating notable efficiency. A follow-up bibliometric analysis provides the first computational map of technology use in Cochrane evidence synthesis, revealing trends across time, domains, and regions.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced are available in the present study and online from the accompanying Github repository of the project.

https://github.com/xiaoruijiang/tool_in_cochrane

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 10, 2025.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Computational Review of Technology-Assisted Medical Evidence Synthesis through Human-LLM Collaboration: A Case Study of Cochrane
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Computational Review of Technology-Assisted Medical Evidence Synthesis through Human-LLM Collaboration: A Case Study of Cochrane
Yiping Ding, Xiaorui Jiang, Opeoluwa Akinseloyin
medRxiv 2025.11.08.25339805; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.11.08.25339805
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Computational Review of Technology-Assisted Medical Evidence Synthesis through Human-LLM Collaboration: A Case Study of Cochrane
Yiping Ding, Xiaorui Jiang, Opeoluwa Akinseloyin
medRxiv 2025.11.08.25339805; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.11.08.25339805

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Informatics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (576)
  • Allergy and Immunology (867)
  • Anesthesia (306)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (4480)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (449)
  • Dermatology (385)
  • Emergency Medicine (614)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1528)
  • Epidemiology (15276)
  • Forensic Medicine (31)
  • Gastroenterology (1133)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (6643)
  • Geriatric Medicine (671)
  • Health Economics (1006)
  • Health Informatics (4602)
  • Health Policy (1378)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1622)
  • Hematology (544)
  • HIV/AIDS (1275)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (15959)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1110)
  • Medical Education (626)
  • Medical Ethics (147)
  • Nephrology (674)
  • Neurology (6692)
  • Nursing (346)
  • Nutrition (1006)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (1152)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (961)
  • Oncology (3369)
  • Ophthalmology (988)
  • Orthopedics (370)
  • Otolaryngology (421)
  • Pain Medicine (437)
  • Palliative Medicine (131)
  • Pathology (668)
  • Pediatrics (1703)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (699)
  • Primary Care Research (717)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (5494)
  • Public and Global Health (9284)
  • Radiology and Imaging (2223)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1375)
  • Respiratory Medicine (1201)
  • Rheumatology (598)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (720)
  • Sports Medicine (535)
  • Surgery (720)
  • Toxicology (100)
  • Transplantation (290)
  • Urology (266)