ABSTRACT
The rapid digitization of healthcare has positioned transformer-based natural language processing (NLP) models as powerful tools for managing clinical textual data. Yet their integration into practice raises unresolved questions of equity and inclusivity criteria. This scoping review synthesizes 56 studies published between 2017 and 2024 to evaluate how equity is addressed across three dimensions: algorithmic equity, data diversity and representativeness, and participatory design. Guided by intersectionality and the Digital Health Equity framework, our analysis shows that most equity audits are post hoc and fragmented, with limited impact on model development. Persistent underrepresentation of linguistic, demographic, and clinical subgroups creates what we define as Data Diversity Debt—a structural liability that compounds over time. Participatory design was observed in only 11% of studies, revealing a critical gap in stakeholder inclusion beyond clinicians. Fairness metrics were inconsistently defined, impeding comparability and accountability. To convert descriptive audits into structural repair, we translate these findings into an equity-by-design roadmap that embeds fairness, inclusivity, and accountability across the full lifecycle of healthcare NLP systems. We conclude that equity must shift from reactive auditing to equity-by-design, integrating participatory governance, fairness-aware training objectives, and continuous monitoring to retire Data Diversity Debt and ensure that clinical NLP systems advance rather than reproduce health disparities.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Resources used in preparing this research were provided, in part, by the Province of Ontario, the Government of Canada through CIFAR, the Connected Minds Program supported by Canada First Research Excellence, and companies sponsoring the Vector Institute. Elham Dolatabadi's research was supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant and a Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Special Call from the Center for Research on Pandemic Preparedness and Health Emergencies.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All 56 articles analyzed during this study, and the data availability table, are available on OSF and can be accessed via https://osf.io/t6y48/.
