Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Machine learning models for early prognosis prediction in cardiogenic shock

Nicolás Nieto, View ORCID ProfileFederico Raimondo, Simon B. Eickhoff, Janine Pöss, Steffen Desch, Hans-Josef Feistritzer, Artur Lichtenberg, Maryna Masyuk, Malte Kelm, Holger Thiele, View ORCID ProfileKaustubh R. Patil, Christian Jung
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.18.25336054
Nicolás Nieto
aInstitute of Systems Neuroscience, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
bInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-7: Brain and Behaviour), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
cDepartment of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: n.nieto{at}fz-juelich.de
Federico Raimondo
aInstitute of Systems Neuroscience, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
bInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-7: Brain and Behaviour), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Federico Raimondo
Simon B. Eickhoff
aInstitute of Systems Neuroscience, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
bInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-7: Brain and Behaviour), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Janine Pöss
dHeart Center Leipzig, University Hospital, Leipzig
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steffen Desch
dHeart Center Leipzig, University Hospital, Leipzig
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hans-Josef Feistritzer
dHeart Center Leipzig, University Hospital, Leipzig
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Artur Lichtenberg
eDepartment of Cardiac surgery, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maryna Masyuk
cDepartment of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Malte Kelm
cDepartment of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
fCardiovascular Research Institute Düsseldorf (CARID), Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Holger Thiele
dHeart Center Leipzig, University Hospital, Leipzig
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kaustubh R. Patil
aInstitute of Systems Neuroscience, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
bInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-7: Brain and Behaviour), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kaustubh R. Patil
Christian Jung
cDepartment of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
fCardiovascular Research Institute Düsseldorf (CARID), Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a severe and frequent complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), necessitating rapid and accurate prognosis as-sessment to guide treatment and intensive care unit (ICU) resource allocation. We developed two machine learning models to predict 30-day outcomes following CS in AMI: an Admission model (using only data available at admission, like demography, comorbidities) and a Full model (incorporating additional laboratory values obtained within 24 hours). The models were trained on the CULPRIT-SHOCK dataset and externally validated using the eICU database. The Admission model achieved an out-of-sample AUC of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.6–0.83) in the development cohort and 0.68 in the validation cohort, while the Full model attained significantly higher performance, with AUCs of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.69–0.9) and 0.78, respectively. The Full model’s superior performance underscores the prognostic value of early laboratory trends, suggesting that dynamic data integration improves risk stratification. Both models outperformed existing risk scores across multiple metrics, provided well-calibrated probabilistic predictions, and demonstrated robustness to missing data. Additionally, they offered patient-level explainability, enhancing clinical interpretability. While promising, the models’ generalizability may be influenced by differences between the CULPRIT-SHOCK and eICU cohorts (e.g., demographics, CS severity thresholds); further validation in larger, prospective cohorts is warranted.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

NCT01927549

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the MODS project funded from the program "Profilbildung 2020" (grant no. PROFILNRW-2020-107-A), an initiative of the Ministry of Culture and Science of the State of Northrhine Westphalia and by the Helmholtz Portfolio Theme Supercomputing and Modeling for the Human Brain. The CULPRIT-SHOCK study was supported by a grant (FP7/2007-2013) from the European Union 7th Framework Program and by the German Heart Research Foundation and the German Cardiac Society.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The study used openly available human data that were originally located at: https://physionet.org/content/eicu-crd/2.0/ The study used upon-request human data that corresponded to the Clinical Trial: Culprit Lesion Only PCI Versus Multivessel PCI in Cardiogenic Shock [CULPRIT-SHOCK]; NCT01927549 https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01927549. Data requested from Holger Thiele, Heart Center Leipzig - University Hospital.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

For the CULPRIT-SHOCK, no personally identifiable information was used and individual participant data are not available for sharing. For the eICU dataset, data is publicly available at https://physionet.org/content/eicu-crd/2.0/ after registration.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted September 19, 2025.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Machine learning models for early prognosis prediction in cardiogenic shock
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Machine learning models for early prognosis prediction in cardiogenic shock
Nicolás Nieto, Federico Raimondo, Simon B. Eickhoff, Janine Pöss, Steffen Desch, Hans-Josef Feistritzer, Artur Lichtenberg, Maryna Masyuk, Malte Kelm, Holger Thiele, Kaustubh R. Patil, Christian Jung
medRxiv 2025.09.18.25336054; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.18.25336054
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Machine learning models for early prognosis prediction in cardiogenic shock
Nicolás Nieto, Federico Raimondo, Simon B. Eickhoff, Janine Pöss, Steffen Desch, Hans-Josef Feistritzer, Artur Lichtenberg, Maryna Masyuk, Malte Kelm, Holger Thiele, Kaustubh R. Patil, Christian Jung
medRxiv 2025.09.18.25336054; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.18.25336054

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Informatics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (576)
  • Allergy and Immunology (867)
  • Anesthesia (306)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (4480)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (449)
  • Dermatology (385)
  • Emergency Medicine (614)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1528)
  • Epidemiology (15276)
  • Forensic Medicine (31)
  • Gastroenterology (1133)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (6644)
  • Geriatric Medicine (671)
  • Health Economics (1006)
  • Health Informatics (4603)
  • Health Policy (1378)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1623)
  • Hematology (544)
  • HIV/AIDS (1275)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (15960)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1111)
  • Medical Education (626)
  • Medical Ethics (147)
  • Nephrology (674)
  • Neurology (6693)
  • Nursing (346)
  • Nutrition (1006)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (1152)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (961)
  • Oncology (3369)
  • Ophthalmology (988)
  • Orthopedics (370)
  • Otolaryngology (421)
  • Pain Medicine (437)
  • Palliative Medicine (131)
  • Pathology (668)
  • Pediatrics (1703)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (699)
  • Primary Care Research (717)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (5494)
  • Public and Global Health (9285)
  • Radiology and Imaging (2223)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1375)
  • Respiratory Medicine (1201)
  • Rheumatology (598)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (720)
  • Sports Medicine (535)
  • Surgery (720)
  • Toxicology (100)
  • Transplantation (290)
  • Urology (267)