Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Closing the Lung Cancer Screening Gap in FQHCs with AI-Powered Clinical Decision Support

View ORCID ProfileArvil Dey
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.08.18.25332990
Arvil Dey
1Onqi Screening, Chicago, IL, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Arvil Dey
  • For correspondence: arvildey{at}gmail.com
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Background Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States, with screening adherence rates below 16% nationally and even lower among underserved populations [1–4]. Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), which serve over 30 million patients annually, face significant challenges in identifying screening-eligible individuals due to workforce constraints, manual workflows, and limited clinical decision support (CDS) infrastructure [5–7].

Objective We developed and evaluated an AI-driven, natural language (NLP)-enhanced CDS platform designed to automate lung cancer screening eligibility determination and integrate seamlessly into the workflows of FQHCs.

Methods The platform combines a deterministic rules engine, encoding the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) 2021 screening criteria, with an NLP pipeline built using SciSpacy and MedSpaCy to extract smoking history details from unstructured clinical notes. Structured and unstructured data were unified using FHIR-compliant APIs to generate actionable screening flags within simulated FQHC workflows.

Results In a synthetic cohort modeled on FQHC populations, the platform achieved precision, recall, and F1-scores above 0.90 for eligibility determination and reduced manual chart review workload by 62%. It generated clear, auditable recommendations aligned with Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) coverage policies and Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) quality measures, while identifying additional high-risk patients who may have been missed in manual reviews.

Conclusion This work demonstrates the feasibility of an AI-powered CDS framework for improving lung cancer screening adherence in resource-limited primary care settings. Future development will focus on prospective validation, expansion to other preventive screenings and population health use cases, and integration of explainable AI to enhance clinical trust and scalability.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Protocols

https://github.com/adey1998/onqi-research

Funding Statement

This research was conducted without external funding.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study used only synthetic and fully de-identified patient data; therefore, institutional review board (IRB) approval was not required under federal guidelines for human subjects research. All development and evaluation procedures adhered to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Privacy Rule, ensuring that patient confidentiality was maintained throughout the study.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in this study are synthetic and generated for research purposes. The data and scripts used to generate them are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

https://github.com/adey1998/onqi-research

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 19, 2025.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Closing the Lung Cancer Screening Gap in FQHCs with AI-Powered Clinical Decision Support
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Closing the Lung Cancer Screening Gap in FQHCs with AI-Powered Clinical Decision Support
Arvil Dey
medRxiv 2025.08.18.25332990; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.08.18.25332990
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Closing the Lung Cancer Screening Gap in FQHCs with AI-Powered Clinical Decision Support
Arvil Dey
medRxiv 2025.08.18.25332990; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.08.18.25332990

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Oncology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (576)
  • Allergy and Immunology (867)
  • Anesthesia (306)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (4480)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (449)
  • Dermatology (385)
  • Emergency Medicine (614)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1528)
  • Epidemiology (15276)
  • Forensic Medicine (31)
  • Gastroenterology (1133)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (6643)
  • Geriatric Medicine (671)
  • Health Economics (1006)
  • Health Informatics (4602)
  • Health Policy (1378)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1622)
  • Hematology (544)
  • HIV/AIDS (1275)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (15959)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1110)
  • Medical Education (626)
  • Medical Ethics (147)
  • Nephrology (674)
  • Neurology (6692)
  • Nursing (346)
  • Nutrition (1006)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (1152)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (961)
  • Oncology (3369)
  • Ophthalmology (988)
  • Orthopedics (370)
  • Otolaryngology (421)
  • Pain Medicine (437)
  • Palliative Medicine (131)
  • Pathology (668)
  • Pediatrics (1703)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (699)
  • Primary Care Research (717)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (5494)
  • Public and Global Health (9284)
  • Radiology and Imaging (2223)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1375)
  • Respiratory Medicine (1201)
  • Rheumatology (598)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (720)
  • Sports Medicine (535)
  • Surgery (720)
  • Toxicology (100)
  • Transplantation (290)
  • Urology (266)