Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Using machine learning to identify subgroups with the highest expected benefit in a population-based water, sanitation, handwashing, and nutrition intervention

View ORCID ProfileCaitlin Hemlock, View ORCID ProfileLaura H. Kwong, View ORCID ProfileLia C.H. Fernald, View ORCID ProfileAlan E. Hubbard, View ORCID ProfileJohn M. Colford, View ORCID ProfileFahmida Tofail, Md. Mahbubur Rahman, View ORCID ProfileSarker Parvez, View ORCID ProfileStephen P. Luby, View ORCID ProfileAndrew N. Mertens
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.06.17.25329796
Caitlin Hemlock
1Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
2Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Caitlin Hemlock
  • For correspondence: chemlock{at}uw.edu
Laura H. Kwong
3Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Laura H. Kwong
Lia C.H. Fernald
4Division of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lia C.H. Fernald
Alan E. Hubbard
5Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alan E. Hubbard
John M. Colford
2Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for John M. Colford
Fahmida Tofail
6Nutrition Research Division, icddr,b, Dhaka-1212, Bangladesh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Fahmida Tofail
Md. Mahbubur Rahman
6Nutrition Research Division, icddr,b, Dhaka-1212, Bangladesh
7Environmental Health and WASH, Health System and Population Studies Division, icddr,b, Dhaka-1212, Bangladesh
8Global Health and Migration Unit, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Uppsala University, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarker Parvez
7Environmental Health and WASH, Health System and Population Studies Division, icddr,b, Dhaka-1212, Bangladesh
9Children’s Health and Environment Program, Child Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sarker Parvez
Stephen P. Luby
10Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Stephen P. Luby
Andrew N. Mertens
2Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Andrew N. Mertens
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Background Understanding who benefits most from investments in water, sanitation, and hygiene (WaSH) interventions can elucidate causal pathways, uncover complex interactions between population characteristics and interventions, and inform targeted implementation. We applied machine learning to identify and describe households of children that benefited most from WaSH and nutrition interventions.

Methods We used causal forests and baseline characteristics of pregnant women enroled in a trial in Bangladesh (2013-2015) to test for heterogenous treatment effects of the primary trial outcomes at two years (length-for-age Z-score [LAZ-score] and diarrhoea prevalence) and one secondary outcome (child development [EASQ Z-score]) for each treatment-outcome combination. We split households into three groups based on predicted treatment effect magnitude and compared characteristics of those that benefitted the most (Tercile 3) versus the least (Tercile 1).

Results Heterogeneity was detected in the effect of Sanitation on EASQ Z-score, compared to Control; children in Tercile 3 were estimated to gain 0.51 SD (95% CI: 0.35, 0.67) whereas children in Tercile 1 were estimated to have no benefit. At baseline, households of children in Tercile 3 were more likely to report that chickens always entered the house (85% vs. 4%) and had animal feces observed in the child’s play area (84% vs. 18%) when compared with Tercile 1. Tercile 3 households also owned less land and assets and lived further from Dhaka, any population center, or a market. We did not detect heterogeneity for any other treatment-outcome comparison.

Conclusions We did not detect heterogeneity in any treatment arms for the outcomes of diarrhoea or LAZ-score, showing that children from all backgrounds benefit from effective interventions equally based on household characteristics. We found heterogeneity in the effect of receiving sanitation improvements on child development, where poorer households located in more remote areas and potentially with higher levels of animal fecal contamination had the highest expected benefit.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

CH was funded by the National Institutes of Health (F31HD105418) for this analysis.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The WASH-Benefits Bangladesh trial was approved by Ethical Review Committee at The International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (PR-11063), the Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects at the University of California, Berkeley (2011-09-3652), and the institutional review board at Stanford University (25863).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Outcome data and some of the household characteristics are publicly available on OSF. The remaining data are available upon reasonable request (contact Andrew Mertens; amertens{at}berkeley.edu).

https://osf.io/tprw2/

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted June 18, 2025.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Using machine learning to identify subgroups with the highest expected benefit in a population-based water, sanitation, handwashing, and nutrition intervention
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Using machine learning to identify subgroups with the highest expected benefit in a population-based water, sanitation, handwashing, and nutrition intervention
Caitlin Hemlock, Laura H. Kwong, Lia C.H. Fernald, Alan E. Hubbard, John M. Colford, Fahmida Tofail, Md. Mahbubur Rahman, Sarker Parvez, Stephen P. Luby, Andrew N. Mertens
medRxiv 2025.06.17.25329796; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.06.17.25329796
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Using machine learning to identify subgroups with the highest expected benefit in a population-based water, sanitation, handwashing, and nutrition intervention
Caitlin Hemlock, Laura H. Kwong, Lia C.H. Fernald, Alan E. Hubbard, John M. Colford, Fahmida Tofail, Md. Mahbubur Rahman, Sarker Parvez, Stephen P. Luby, Andrew N. Mertens
medRxiv 2025.06.17.25329796; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.06.17.25329796

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (576)
  • Allergy and Immunology (868)
  • Anesthesia (306)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (4482)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (449)
  • Dermatology (385)
  • Emergency Medicine (615)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1528)
  • Epidemiology (15277)
  • Forensic Medicine (31)
  • Gastroenterology (1133)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (6644)
  • Geriatric Medicine (671)
  • Health Economics (1006)
  • Health Informatics (4605)
  • Health Policy (1378)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1623)
  • Hematology (544)
  • HIV/AIDS (1276)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (15961)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1111)
  • Medical Education (626)
  • Medical Ethics (147)
  • Nephrology (674)
  • Neurology (6695)
  • Nursing (346)
  • Nutrition (1006)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (1153)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (961)
  • Oncology (3369)
  • Ophthalmology (988)
  • Orthopedics (370)
  • Otolaryngology (421)
  • Pain Medicine (437)
  • Palliative Medicine (131)
  • Pathology (669)
  • Pediatrics (1704)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (700)
  • Primary Care Research (717)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (5495)
  • Public and Global Health (9285)
  • Radiology and Imaging (2223)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1375)
  • Respiratory Medicine (1201)
  • Rheumatology (598)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (721)
  • Sports Medicine (535)
  • Surgery (722)
  • Toxicology (100)
  • Transplantation (290)
  • Urology (267)