Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in various natural language processing tasks, including text classification, information extraction, and sentiment analysis. However, most existing benchmarks are general-purpose and lack relevance for domain-specific applications such as public health. To address this gap, the objective of this study is to develop and test an open-source solution enabling intuitive, easy and rapid benchmarking of popular LLMs in public health contexts.
An LLM prediction prototype was developed, supporting multiple popular LLMs. It enables users to upload datasets, apply prompts, and generate structured JSON outputs for LLM tasks. The application prototype built with R and the Shiny library facilitates automated LLM evaluation and benchmarking by computing key performance metrics for categorical and variables. We tested these prototypes on four public health use cases: stance detection towards vaccination in tweets and Facebook posts, detection of vaccine adverse reaction in BabyCenter forum posts, and extraction of epidemiological quantitative features from the World Health Organization Disease Outbreak News.
Results revealed high variability in LLM performance depending on the task, dataset, and model, with no single LLM consistently outperforming others across all tasks. While larger models generally excelled, smaller models performed competitively in specific scenarios, highlighting the importance of task-specific model selection.
This study contributes to the effective LLM integration in public health by providing a structured, user-friendly and scalable solution for LLM prediction, evaluation and benchmarking. Our findings underline the relevance of standardised and task-specific evaluation methods and model selection, and the use of clear and structured prompts to improve LLM performance in domain-specific use cases.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by Fondation Botnar and the European Union Horizon H2020 grant VEO (874735). The funders had no role in the design or execution of this study and will have no role in the analyses, interpretation of the data, or decision to submit results.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study used only openly available data from Facebook, Twitter and BabyCenter US forum.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Updated manuscript based on peer-review feedback
Data Availability
Data and code used for the LLMs prediction prototype and evaluation and benchmarking can be found in the LLM benchmarking repository (https://github.com/digitalepidemiologylab/llm_benchmarking). In addition, data can be found at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29860595.v2.
