Abstract
Recent advances in the Large Language Models (LLMs) provide a promising avenue for retrieving relevant information from clinical notes for accurate risk estimation of adverse patient outcomes. In this empirical study, we quantify the gain in predictive performance obtained by prompting LLMs to study the clinical notes and summarize potential risks for downstream tasks. Specifically, we prompt LLMs to generate a summary of progress notes and state potential complications that may arise. We then learn representations of the generated notes in sequential order and estimate the risks of patients in the ICU getting readmitted in ICU after discharge (ICU bouncebacks) and predict the overall length of stay in the ICU. Our analysis in the real-world MIMIC III dataset shows performance gains of 7.17% in terms of AUC-ROC and 14.16% in terms of AUPRC for the ICU bounceback task and 2.84% in terms of F-1 score and 7.12% in terms of AUPRC for the ICU LOS Prediction task. This demonstrates that the LLM-infused models outperform the approaches that only directly rely on clinical notes and other EHR data.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This project is partially funded by the CDC MInD Healthcare Network grant U01CK000594 and the associated COVID-19 supplemental funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
akash-choudhuri{at}uiowa.edu, philip-polgreen{at}uiowa.edu, alberto-segre{at}uiowa.edu, bijaya-adhikari{at}uiowa.edu
Data Availability
The EHR data used in this study can be accessed via https://mimic.mit.edu
