Prognostic Value of Left Ventricular 18F-Florbetapir Uptake in Systemic Light-Chain Amyloidosis

Olivier F. Clerc, Yesh Datar, Sarah AM Cuddy, Giada Bianchi, Alexandra Taylor, Dominik C Benz, Matthew Robertson, Marie Foley Kijewski, Michael Jerosch-Herold, Raymond Y Kwong, Frederick L Ruberg, Ronglih Liao, Marcelo F Di Carli, Rodney H Falk, Sharmila Dorbala
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.13.23295520

Abstract

Background Myocardial immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) amyloid deposits trigger heart failure, cardiomyocyte stretch and myocardial injury, leading to adverse cardiac outcomes. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with 18F-florbetapir, a novel amyloid-targeting radiotracer, can quantify left ventricular (LV) amyloid burden, but its prognostic value is not known. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of LV amyloid burden quantified by 18F-florbetapir PET/CT and to identify mechanistic pathways mediating its association with outcomes.

Methods Eighty-one participants with newly-diagnosed systemic AL amyloidosis were prospectively enrolled and underwent 18F-florbetapir PET/CT. LV amyloid burden was quantified using 18F-florbetapir LV percent injected dose (%ID). Mayo AL stage was determined using troponin T, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain levels. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined as all-cause death, heart failure hospitalization, or cardiac transplantation within 12 months.

Results Among participants (median age 61 years, 57% males), 36% experienced MACE. Incidence of MACE increased across tertiles of LV amyloid burden from 7% to 63% (p<0.001). LV amyloid burden was significantly associated with MACE in univariable analysis (hazard ratio 1.45, 95% confidence interval 1.15-1.82, p=0.002). However, this association became non-significant in multivariable analyses adjusted for Mayo AL stage. Mediation analysis showed that the association between 18F-florbetapir LV %ID and MACE was primarily mediated by NT-proBNP (p<0.001), a marker of cardiomyocyte stretch and component of Mayo AL stage.

Conclusion In this first study to link cardiac 18F-florbetapir uptake to subsequent outcomes, LV amyloid burden estimated by LV %ID predicted MACE in AL amyloidosis. But this effect was not independent of Mayo AL stage. LV amyloid burden was associated with MACE primarily via NT-pro-BNP, a marker of cardiomyocyte stretch and component of Mayo AL stage. These findings provide novel insights into the mechanism through which myocardial AL amyloid leads to MACE.

Clinical Perspective In systemic light-chain (AL) amyloidosis, cardiac involvement is the key determinant of adverse outcomes. Usually, prognosis is based on the Mayo AL stage, determined by troponin T, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and the difference between involved and uninvolved immunoglobulin free light chain levels (dFLC). Cardiac amyloid burden is not considered in this staging. In the present study, we used the amyloid-specific radiotracer 18F-florbetapir to quantify left ventricular (LV) amyloid burden in 81 participants with newly-diagnosed AL amyloidosis and evaluated its prognostic value on major adverse outcomes (MACE: all-cause death, heart failure hospitalization, or cardiac transplantation within 12 months). We found that higher LV amyloid burden by 18F-florbetapir positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) was strongly associated with MACE. However, this association became non-significant after adjustment for the Mayo AL stage. Mediation analysis offered novel pathophysiological insights, implying that LV amyloid burden leads to MACE predominantly through cardiomyocyte stretch and light chain toxicity (by NT-proBNP), rather than through myocardial injury (by troponin T), also considering the severity of plasma cell dyscrasia (by dFLC). This mediation by NT-proBNP may explain why the association with outcomes was non-significant with adjustment for Mayo AL stage. Together, these results establish quantitative 18F-florbetapir PET/CT as a valid method to predict adverse outcomes in AL amyloidosis. These results support the use of 18F-florbetapir PET/CT to measure the effects of novel fibril-depleting therapies, in addition to plasma cell therapy, to improve outcomes in systemic AL amyloidosis.

Introduction

In systemic light-chain (AL) amyloidosis, clonal plasma cells produce a large quantity of circulating abnormal immunoglobulin light chains. These light chains are prone to misfolding, which leads to aggregation as amyloid fibrils in multiple organs, extracellular space expansion, organ dysfunction and death.1,2 Among affected organs, cardiac involvement is the most important determinant of adverse outcomes in AL amyloidosis.1,2 If untreated, AL amyloid cardiomyopathy is highly fatal, with a median survival of 6 months.1 Even with state-of-the-art therapies, including daratumumab, the 12-month mortality remains substantial, about 20%.3,4 The importance of cardiac involvement is reflected in the Mayo prognostic staging, which is mostly based on cardiac serum biomarkers: troponin T, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and the difference between involved and uninvolved immunoglobulin free light chains (dFLC).5

Imaging metrics of cardiac AL amyloid burden are not included in the current prognostic staging.6,7 However, a strong prognostic value was demonstrated for cardiac imaging in AL amyloidosis, particularly for echocardiography with structural, diastolic and strain metrics,8,9 as well as for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with metrics of cardiac structure and function, late gadolinium enhancement, T1 mapping and extracellular volume.8,10,11 Furthermore, the novel, specific β-amyloid-binding radiotracers for positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) have shown promise to diagnose and quantify cardiac AL amyloidosis.12–18 Moreover, cardiac uptake of the radiotracer 11C-Pittsburgh compound B has been associated with all-cause death in AL amyloidosis.19,20 However, whether metrics of amyloid burden derived from β-amyloid-binding radiotracer PET/CT add prognostic value over the Mayo stage, and whether their associations with outcomes are direct or indirect, i.e., through specific pathophysiological pathways, are unknown.

Among amyloid-specific radiotracers for PET/CT, 18F-florbetapir exhibits a high cardiac uptake in AL amyloidosis,13 and can detect cardiac AL amyloid deposits even in participants with normal cardiac serum biomarkers (troponin T, NT-proBNP) and left ventricular (LV) thickness.16 This suggests the potential to quantify cardiac amyloid burden and thereby predict outcomes in AL amyloidosis. Therefore, the aims of this study of participants with new diagnosis of AL amyloidosis with or without known cardiac involvement were: 1) to assess the prognostic value of cardiac amyloid burden metrics derived from 18F-florbetapir PET/CT images for major adverse cardiac events (MACE), 2) to evaluate the independent prognostic value of cardiac amyloid burden metrics compared with the Mayo stage, and 3) to investigate mechanistic pathways of the effects of cardiac amyloid burden on MACE using mediation analysis. We also explored all-cause death as a secondary endpoint.

Methods

Participant Selection Criteria

This prospective study was approved by the Mass General Brigham Human Research Committee, and each participant provided written informed consent. From 2016 to 2022, participants with systemic AL amyloidosis were recruited primarily from Brigham and Women’s Hospital (Boston), as well as form Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (Boston), Massachusetts General Hospital (Boston), Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (New York) into the Molecular Imaging of Primary Amyloid Cardiomyopathy cohort study (MICA; NCT02641145).16,21–24 Systemic AL amyloidosis was diagnosed by standard criteria, with confirmation of the plasma cell dyscrasia in the bone marrow, as well as endomyocardial or systemic biopsy with determination of amyloid type by immunohistochemistry or mass spectrometry.25 Key exclusion criteria were significant non-amyloid cardiac disease (e.g., coronary artery disease, severe valvular disease), cardiac pacemaker, implanted cardioverter-defibrillator, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 mL/min/1.73m2 and severe claustrophobia. All participants from the MICA study at therapy initiation for newly-diagnosed systemic AL amyloidosis were included (N=81), while participants in remission after therapy were excluded (N=25). Treatment decisions for AL amyloidosis were made by the patients’ primary hematologist without knowledge of the results of the PET/CT study.

Laboratory Evaluation and Mayo AL Prognostic Staging

Serum troponin T, NT-proBNP, free light chain levels, creatinine and hemoglobin were measured at Brigham and Women’s Hospital central laboratory. The eGFR was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula. The Mayo AL stage was calculated starting at one point, with one more point added for each positive criterion: troponin T ≥0.025 ng/mL, NT-proBNP ≥1800 pg/mL and dFLC ≥180 mg/L.5

18F-Florbetapir PET/CT Acquisition

All study participants underwent a cardiac PET/CT (Discovery STE, Discovery RX, or Discovery MI, GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) with 30-min list-mode acquisition at the Brigham and Women’s Hospital. A low-dose chest CT scan was acquired for patient positioning and attenuation correction of the PET emission data. 18F-florbetapir was injected intravenously 1 minute after the beginning of PET acquisition. The median injected 18F-florbetapir activity was 9.0 mCi (interquartile range [IQR] 8.5‒9.9), with a median effective dose of 6.9 mSv (IQR 6.5‒7.5), including 0.5 mSv for the low-dose CT scan. Static images of the heart were reconstructed using data from 4 minutes to 30 minutes after radiotracer injection, based on previously validated data on 18F-florbetapir washout from the blood pool.13

18F-Florbetapir PET/CT Quantitation of Amyloid Burden

LV 18F-florbetapir activity concentration was measured volumetrically on deidentified static images using PMOD software (PMOD Technologies LLC, Zurich, Switzerland). A volume of interest (VOI) was placed on PET images using fused CT images to define the LV contours, including the blood pool and the interventricular septum. To minimize observer bias in myocardial tracings, we used the iso-contouring function from PMOD on the LV tracings to delineate the myocardial wall uptake without blood pool as LV wall VOI. This was performed by automatic thresholding of VOI activity concentration above two times the mean blood pool activity concentration in a 10-mm spherical left atrial VOI, as previously done.13,16 To quantify cardiac amyloid burden, we used the LV percent injected dose (%ID), calculated as the LV wall VOI mean activity concentration multiplied by the LV wall VOI volume and divided by the injected activity. All activity values were decay-corrected to scan start. LV %ID quantifies the total amount radiotracer bound to the LV myocardium, and therefore, the LV amyloid burden. Other uptake metrics were considered, but LV %ID was chosen for its ability to measure the total amyloid burden and its superior prognostic ability (Supplemental Methods, Supplemental Table 1).

Echocardiography

All participants underwent echocardiography, but only exams performed within 6 months of PET/CT were included (median absolute difference 5 days, IQR 1–27, 6 exams excluded). Measurements were performed using dedicated software (TOMTEC Image Arena version 4.6, TOMTEC Imaging Systems GmbH, Unterschleissheim, Germany).

Study Endpoints and Event Ascertainment

MACE was defined as a composite of all-cause death, heart failure hospitalization, or cardiac transplantation. Event ascertainment was performed by phone calls to participants and review of electronic medical records, with 99% successful follow-up. Heart failure hospitalization was adjudicated blinded to imaging results. The primary endpoint for this study was MACE during the first 12 months to maintain a close association with the diagnosis of AL amyloidosis. The secondary endpoint was all-cause death within 12 months. Sensitivity analyses using adverse events during the complete follow-up were performed (Supplemental Materials).

Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables were summarized as median with IQR, and categorical variables were as frequency with percentage. They were analyzed by tertiles of LV amyloid burden based on 18F-florbetapir PET/CT LV %ID. The Jonckheere-Terpstra test or the Cochran-Armitage test were used to calculate p-values for trend for continuous or categorical variables, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted by tertiles of LV amyloid burden with the log-rank test. Cox regression was performed to evaluate associations with adverse outcomes. Proportional hazards assumptions were checked. Finally, we performed a causal mediation analysis of the association between LV amyloid burden and MACE,26,27 using the biomarkers composing the Mayo stage, which have been associated with adverse outcomes.5 We assumed that NT-proBNP (reflecting cardiomyocyte stretch and light chain toxicity) and troponin T (reflecting myocardial injury) were potential mediators, while dFLC (reflecting circulating light chains) was a potential confounder of the association between LV amyloid burden and MACE.28 The choice of mediator or confounder was based on the direction of the assumed causality: LV amyloid burden (%ID) causes cardiomyocyte stretch (NT-proBNP) and myocardial damage (troponin T), but circulating light chains (dFLC) cause LV amyloid burden, while cardiomyocyte stretch, myocardial damage and circulating light chains cause MACE. Thus, LV amyloid burden can determine MACE directly, or indirectly through a mediation by cardiomyocyte stretch and myocardial damage, and the association between LV amyloid burden and MACE may be affected by confounding from circulating light chains. Linear regression was used to evaluate associations between 18F-florbetapir uptake and biomarkers, log-transformed to comply with assumptions for linear regression. An accelerated failure time model (parametric survival regression) with log-normal distribution was used to study the association between 18F-florbetapir uptake and MACE with adjustment for biomarkers in the mediation analysis, because the rare outcome assumption allowing the use of Cox regression was not met.26,27 The log-normal distribution exhibited a better fit than other potential distributions and was therefore chosen. Given the continuous nature of LV amyloid burden, we specified the treatment value as the median of the highest tertile of LV %ID, and the control value as the median of the lowest tertile of LV %ID. For the mediation analysis, confidence intervals and p-values were computed using bootstrapping with 1000 draws and percentile confidence intervals.27 Two-sided p-values were reported and considered statistically significant if <0.05. Data were analyzed using R version 4.3.1 (R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) and the packages tidyverse, DescTools, gtsummary, rstatix, survival, survminer, ggsurvfit and mediation. The manuscript was written according to the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) and A Guideline for Reporting Mediation Analyses (AGReMA) statements.29,30

Results

Participant Characteristics at Baseline

In our 81 participants with newly-diagnosed AL amyloidosis, the median age was 61 years (IQR 57–67), 46 were males (57%), and 61 had cardiac involvement by elevated serum cardiac biomarkers (75%). Increasing tertiles of LV amyloid burden by 18F-florbetapir %ID were associated with lower systolic blood pressure, higher serum cardiac biomarkers, higher Mayo AL stage and worse LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) on echocardiography (all p<0.001; Table 1). This suggests that LV amyloid burden assessed by 18F-florbetapir %ID quantifies the functional severity of AL cardiomyopathy (Figure 1). Among participants, 73% were treated with a cyclophosphamide-bortezomib-dexamethasone (CyBorD) regimen, 52% with daratumumab, 43% received other chemotherapeutic agents, and 21% underwent autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT; Table 1).

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Cardiac Amyloid Quantification with 18F-Florbetapir PET/CT

Images from 18F-florbetapir PET/CT with low, middle and high LV amyloid burden are presented, showing clear differences in left ventricular uptake.

%ID/mL: Percent injected dose by milliliter. LV: Left ventricular. PET/CT: Positron emission tomography/computed tomography.

View this table:
Table 1. Participant Characteristics at Baseline

Adverse Outcomes

Within 12 months, 29 participants experienced MACE (36%), among whom 13 died (16%), 20 were hospitalized for heart failure (25%), and 3 underwent cardiac transplantation (4%). MACE, all-cause death and heart failure hospitalization were more frequent with higher LV amyloid burden (all p<0.001; Table 2). During the complete available follow-up (median 26 months, IQR 3–45), 40 participants experienced MACE (49%), and 22 died (27%; Supplemental Table 2).

View this table:
Table 2. Adverse Outcomes Within 12 Months

Kaplan-Meier Analysis of LV Amyloid Burden with MACE and All-Cause Death

Increasing tertiles of LV amyloid burden by 18F-florbetapir %ID were significantly associated with both MACE and all-cause death within 12 months (Figure 2). For MACE, we found p<0.001 for trend across tertiles, and pairwise testing showed: low vs. middle tertile p=0.014, middle vs. high tertile p=0.056 and low vs. high tertile p<0.001. For all-cause death, we found p<0.027 for trend across tertiles, and pairwise testing showed: low vs. middle tertile p=0.141, middle vs. high tertile p=0.462 and low vs. high tertile p=0.074. Using log-rank statistic maximization, the optimal LV %ID cut-off was >2.0 to predict both MACE and all-cause death.

Figure 2.
Figure 2. Outcome Analysis Within 12 Months Based on LV Amyloid Burden

Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test were performed by levels of LV amyloid burden based on tertiles of 18F-florbetapir LV %ID.

%ID: Percent injected dose. LV: Left ventricular. MACE: Major adverse cardiac events (all-cause death, heart failure hospitalization or cardiac transplantation).

Univariable Predictors of MACE and All-Cause Death

In Cox regression for outcomes within 12 months, troponin T and NT-proBNP were associated with MACE and all-cause death, but dFLC was only associated with all-cause death, while age and sex were not associated with adverse outcomes (Table 3). In particular, LV amyloid burden by 18F-florbetapir %ID was associated with MACE and all-cause death (p=0.002 and p=0.028). 18F-florbetapir LV %ID was higher in participants who experienced MACE compared to those who did not: median 2.30 (IQR 1.96–3.08) vs. 1.33 (0.52–2.10, p<0.001). ASCT was associated with lower MACE and chemotherapies other than CyBorD and daratumumab with lower death. These associations may be explained by the initial treatment choice based on predicted risk.

View this table:
Table 3. Predictors of Adverse Outcomes Within 12 Months

Independent Association of LV Amyloid Burden with MACE or All-Cause Death

In multivariable Cox regression including the Mayo stage, LV amyloid burden by 18F-florbetapir %ID did not remain independently associated with MACE or all-cause death (Table 3). A potential explanation is a mediation by the components of the Mayo stage, which was investigated using mediation analysis. Moreover, therapies were no longer associated with outcomes after adjustment for the Mayo stage, which supports the interpretation that the univariable associations were reflecting treatment choice based on the Mayo stage.

Mediation Analysis of the Relationship Between LV Amyloid Burden and MACE

Our causal mediation model evaluated the magnitude of the relationship between LV amyloid burden (by 18F-florbetapir %ID) and MACE, directly or indirectly through cardiomyocyte stretch (by NT-proBNP) or myocardial injury (by troponin T), accounting for confounding by circulating light chains (by dFLC). We found that LV amyloid burden was associated with MACE primarily through an indirect pathway over cardiomyocyte stretch (p<0.001), while the indirect pathway over myocardial injury, and the direct pathway to MACE were statistically non-significant (Figure 3). Circulating light chains showed no significant confounding of the association between LV amyloid burden and MACE. Performing the mediation analysis on all-cause death instead of MACE led to similar results.

Figure 3.
Figure 3. Mediation Analysis Between LV Amyloid Burden and MACE Within 12 Months

This causal mediation model quantifies how LV amyloid burden (by 18F-florbetapir LV %ID, yellow) predicts 12-month MACE (orange) directly and indirectly through cardiomyocyte stretch and light chain toxicity (by NT-proBNP as a mediator, blue) and myocardial injury (by troponin T as a mediator, blue), adjusted for circulating light chains (by dFLC as a confounder, green). Arrows represent the direction of assumed causality, with grey dashed arrows for statistically non-significant associations. Results are presented as regression coefficients with * p<0.05, ** p<0.01 and *** p<0.001. LV amyloid burden was associated with MACE (total effect [TE]: -17838, 95%CI -7998529 – -610, p<0.001) essentially through an indirect pathway over cardiomyocyte stretch (NT-proBNP; average causal mediation effect [ACME]: -20693, 95%CI -12877245 – -667, p<0.001), while the indirect pathway over myocardial injury (troponin T), the direct pathway to MACE (average direct effect [ADE]: 2855, 95%CI -101307 – 2073952, p=0.590), and the confounding by circulating light chains (dFLC) were non-significant.

%ID: Percent injected dose. CI: Confidence interval. dFLC: Difference in immunoglobulin free light chains. LV: Left ventricular. MACE: Major adverse cardiac events (all-cause death, heart failure hospitalization or cardiac transplantation). NT-proBNP: N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide.

Sensitivity Analyses

Using endpoints during the complete available follow-up, outcome analyses and mediation analyses led to identical conclusions (Supplemental Materials).

Discussion

This prospective study of 81 participants with newly-diagnosed systemic AL amyloidosis revealed three key novel findings. First, LV amyloid burden quantified by LV 18F-florbetapir %ID on PET/CT is a significant predictor of MACE and all-cause death. Second, adjustment for the Mayo AL stage, based on troponin T, NT-proBNP and dFLC, attenuated the association of 18F-florbetapir LV %ID with MACE and all-cause death. Third, mediation analysis implied that the association between 18F-florbetapir LV %ID and MACE is primarily mediated by NT-proBNP, which reflects cardiomyocyte stretch and light chain toxicity, and quantifies heart failure severity. Thus, amyloid burden contributes to adverse outcomes in AL amyloidosis via cardiomyocyte stretch, light chain toxicity and heart failure. This mediation may explain why the adjustment for the Mayo AL stage made the association between 18F-florbetapir LV %ID and outcomes non-significant.

In AL amyloidosis, echocardiographic strain and diastolic metrics, as well as late gadolinium enhancement, T1 and extracellular volume on cardiac MRI, are known to predict adverse outcomes.8–11 In PET, previous studies have only reported that adverse outcomes were associated with 11C-Pittsburgh compound B cardiac uptake, measured either as visually positive, or as ratio of maximal LV uptake / mean aortic uptake.19,20 The present study demonstrates for the first time that amyloid burden estimated by 18F-florbetapir LV %ID predicts adverse outcomes. Furthermore, we observed more severe alterations in cardiac biomarkers, as well as structural and functional metrics from echocardiography, in participants with higher LV amyloid burden. Together, these findings support the ability of 18F-florbetapir PET/CT with LV %ID to quantify LV amyloid burden and the severity of cardiac amyloidosis, which predicts adverse outcomes. This capability is essential to the development of 18F-florbetapir PET/CT as a potential surrogate biomarker that could accelerate the development of novel fibril-depleting therapies to reduce amyloid burden.31,32

Most prior studies evaluating the prognostic value of cardiac imaging measures did not include adjustment for Mayo AL stage. We have shown that the association between amyloid burden and MACE became non-significant when adjusted for the Mayo AL stage. We hypothesized that this may be due to mediation by one or more of the components of the Mayo AL stage: troponin T, NT-proBNP, and dFLC. Therefore, we performed a mediation analysis based on these biomarkers, which generated new mechanistic insights into the association between LV amyloid burden and adverse outcomes. Our findings suggest that this association is primarily mediated by NT-proBNP, a marker of cardiomyocyte stretch and light chain toxicity. Therefore, it appears that the mere presence of amyloid in the heart does not lead to adverse outcomes. Rather, amyloid burden substantial enough to cause mechanical stress and ultimately heart failure is necessary to lead to adverse outcomes in AL amyloidosis. This finding may be intuitive, but it has not previously been demonstrated. Indeed, until now, there was no specific and quantitative tool to assess amyloid burden. This is now available with amyloid-binding PET radiotracers. In our study, troponin T was not an independent predictor of outcomes, unlike in previous works, which found a significant prognostic value.5 Thus, we did not find a significant mediation pathway through troponin T as a marker of myocardial injury. Based on our data, we conclude that the cardiomyocyte stretch pathway predominates over the myocardial injury pathway and over a direct pathway. These pathophysiologic insights on the consequences of amyloid deposition in the myocardium complement previous research on the toxic effects of circulating light chains on cardiomyocyte function.33,34

This study had limitations. First, the small sample size limited our statistical power to analyze associations with outcomes. However, our statistically significant results support important effect sizes, thus clinically relevant findings. Moreover, our cohort is among the largest for systemic AL amyloidosis. Second, hematological response was unknown in participants experiencing early death, and almost every participant surviving up to 12 months had a favorable hematological response. Therefore, hematological response could not be meaningfully included in survival models. However, our study also had strengths, such as the prospective, structured cohort design, the inclusion of AL participants with and without cardiomyopathy, all of them with new diagnosis, the quantitative evaluation of LV amyloid burden by 18F-florbetapir PET/CT, the comparison with the Mayo stage, and the mediation analysis.

In conclusion, LV amyloid burden quantified by 18F-florbetapir LV %ID in PET/CT is associated with worse cardiac function and worse cardiac biomarkers, and predicts adverse outcomes in participants with systemic AL amyloidosis, albeit not independent of the Mayo AL stage. Through mediation analysis, we gained novel pathophysiological insights suggesting that the impact of LV amyloid burden on adverse outcome is mediated by NT-pro-BNP, a marker of cardiomyocyte stretch, light chain toxicity, and heart failure. Together, these results establish quantitative 18F-florbetapir PET/CT as a valid method to predict adverse outcomes in AL amyloidosis. This method could become pivotal as an amyloid-specific surrogate outcome in future clinical trials on novel therapies for systemic AL amyloidosis.

Data Availability

The data underlying this article cannot be shared publicly due to data privacy as defined in the informed consent document.

Sources of funding

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health.

Dorbala: R01 HL 130563; K24 HL 157648; AHA16 CSA 2888 0004; AHA19SRG34950011

Falk: R01 HL 130563

Liao: AHA16 CSA 2888 0004; AHA19SRG34950011

Ruberg: R01 HL 130563; R01 HL 093148

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02641145

Disclosures

Clerc: Research fellowship from the International Society of Amyloidosis and Pfizer.

Cuddy: Investigator-initiated research grant from Pfizer.

Ruberg: Consulting fees from Astra Zeneca, research support from Pfizer, Alnylam, and Ionis/Akcea.

DiCarli: Research grant from Gilead and Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, in-kind research support from Amgen, consulting fees from Sanofi, MedTrace Pharma, and Valo Health.

Kwong: Grant funding from Alynlam Pharmaceuticals.

Falk: Consulting fees from Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Caelum Biosciences, research funding from GlaxoSmithKline and Akcea.

Dorbala: Consulting fees: Pfizer, GE Health Care, Astra Zeneca, Novo Nordisk; investigator-initiated grant: Pfizer, GE Healthcare, Attralus, Siemens, Philips.

The other authors do not have any conflicts of interest to declare.

Abbreviations

%ID
Percent injected dose
AL
Light-chain amyloidosis
CT
Computed tomography
dFLC
Difference between involved and uninvolved immunoglobulin free light chains
LV
Left ventricular
MACE
Major adverse cardiac events
MICA
Molecular Imaging of Primary Amyloid Cardiomyopathy Study
NT-proBNP
N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide
PET
Positron emission tomography
VOI
Volume of interest

Acknowledgments

We are extremely grateful to each of the study participants and their families for their participation and to our funding partners for making this study possible.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Falk RH, Alexander KM, Liao R, Dorbala S. AL (Light-Chain) Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Review of Diagnosis and Therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(12):1323–1341. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2016.06.053
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Merlini G, Dispenzieri A, Sanchorawala V, et al. Systemic immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4(1):38. doi:10.1038/s41572-018-0034-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Kastritis E, Palladini G, Minnema MC, et al. Daratumumab-Based Treatment for Immunoglobulin Light-Chain Amyloidosis. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(1):46–58. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2028631
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Bianchi G, Zhang Y, Comenzo RL. AL Amyloidosis: Current Chemotherapy and Immune Therapy Treatment Strategies: JACC: CardioOncology State-of-the-Art Review. JACC CardioOncol. 2021;3(4):467–487. doi:10.1016/j.jaccao.2021.09.003
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    Kumar S, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, et al. Revised prognostic staging system for light chain amyloidosis incorporating cardiac biomarkers and serum free light chain measurements. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(9):989–995. doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.38.5724
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Dorbala S, Ando Y, Bokhari S, et al. ASNC/AHA/ASE/EANM/HFSA/ISA/SCMR/SNMMI expert consensus recommendations for multimodality imaging in cardiac amyloidosis: Part 1 of 2-evidence base and standardized methods of imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2019;26(6):2065–2123. doi:10.1007/s12350-019-01760-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Dorbala S, Cuddy S, Falk RH. How to Image Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Practical Approach. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13(6):1368–1383. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.07.015
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Knight DS, Zumbo G, Barcella W, et al. Cardiac Structural and Functional Consequences of Amyloid Deposition by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance and Echocardiography and Their Prognostic Roles. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12(5):823–833. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.02.016
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    Cohen OC, Ismael A, Pawarova B, et al. Longitudinal strain is an independent predictor of survival and response to therapy in patients with systemic AL amyloidosis. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(4):333–341. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab507
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    Fontana M, Pica S, Reant P, et al. Prognostic Value of Late Gadolinium Enhancement Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Cardiac Amyloidosis. Circulation. 2015;132(16):1570–1579. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.016567
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    Banypersad SM, Fontana M, Maestrini V, et al. T1 mapping and survival in systemic light-chain amyloidosis. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(4):244–251. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu444
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    Antoni G, Lubberink M, Estrada S, et al. In vivo visualization of amyloid deposits in the heart with 11C-PIB and PET. J Nucl Med. 2013;54(2):213–220. doi:10.2967/jnumed.111.102053
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    Dorbala S, Vangala D, Semer J, et al. Imaging cardiac amyloidosis: a pilot study using 18F-florbetapir positron emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41(9):1652–1662. doi:10.1007/s00259-014-2787-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.
    Law WP, Wang WYS, Moore PT, Mollee PN, Ng ACT. Cardiac Amyloid Imaging with 18F-Florbetaben PET: A Pilot Study. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(11):1733–1739. doi:10.2967/jnumed.115.169870
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.
    Dietemann S, Nkoulou R. Amyloid PET imaging in cardiac amyloidosis: a pilot study using 18F-flutemetamol positron emission tomography. Ann Nucl Med. 2019;33(8):624–628. doi:10.1007/s12149-019-01372-7
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. 16.↵
    Cuddy SAM, Bravo PE, Falk RH, et al. Improved Quantification of Cardiac Amyloid Burden in Systemic Light Chain Amyloidosis: Redefining Early Disease? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13(6):1325–1336. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.02.025
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.
    Rosengren S, Skibsted Clemmensen T, Tolbod L, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of [11C]PIB Positron Emission Tomography for Detection of Cardiac Amyloidosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13(6):1337–1347. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.02.023
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    Genovesi D, Vergaro G, Giorgetti A, et al. [18F]-Florbetaben PET/CT for Differential Diagnosis Among Cardiac Immunoglobulin Light Chain, Transthyretin Amyloidosis, and Mimicking Conditions. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021;14(1):246–255. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.05.031
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. 19.↵
    Lee SP, Suh HY, Park S, et al. Pittsburgh B Compound Positron Emission Tomography in Patients With AL Cardiac Amyloidosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75(4):380–390. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.11.037
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    Choi YJ, Koh Y, Lee HJ, et al. Independent Prognostic Utility of 11 C-Pittsburgh Compound B PET in Patients with Light-Chain Cardiac Amyloidosis. J Nucl Med. 2022;63(7):1064–1069. doi:10.2967/jnumed.121.263033
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    Ehman EC, El-Sady MS, Kijewski MF, et al. Early Detection of Multiorgan Light-Chain Amyloidosis by Whole-Body 18F-Florbetapir PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2019;60(9):1234–1239. doi:10.2967/jnumed.118.221770
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.
    Bravo PE, Fujikura K, Kijewski MF, et al. Relative Apical Sparing of Myocardial Longitudinal Strain Is Explained by Regional Differences in Total Amyloid Mass Rather Than the Proportion of Amyloid Deposits. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12(7 Pt 1):1165–1173. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.06.016
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.
    Khor YM, Cuddy S, Harms HJ, et al. Quantitative [18F]florbetapir PET/CT may identify lung involvement in patients with systemic AL amyloidosis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47(8):1998–2009. doi:10.1007/s00259-019-04627-7
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. 24.↵
    Cuddy SAM, Jerosch-Herold M, Falk RH, et al. Myocardial Composition in Light-Chain Cardiac Amyloidosis More Than 1 Year After Successful Therapy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. Published online December 10, 2021:S1936-878X(21)00832-9. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.09.032
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. 25.↵
    Dorbala S, Ando Y, Bokhari S, et al. ASNC/AHA/ASE/EANM/HFSA/ISA/SCMR/SNMMI expert consensus recommendations for multimodality imaging in cardiac amyloidosis: Part 2 of 2-Diagnostic criteria and appropriate utilization. J Nucl Cardiol. 2020;27(2):659–673. doi:10.1007/s12350-019-01761-5
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. 26.↵
    VanderWeele TJ. Mediation Analysis: A Practitioner’s Guide. Annu Rev Public Health. 2016;37(1):17–32. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032315-021402
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    Rijnhart JJM, Lamp SJ, Valente MJ, MacKinnon DP, Twisk JWR, Heymans MW. Mediation analysis methods used in observational research: a scoping review and recommendations. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021;21(1):226. doi:10.1186/s12874-021-01426-3
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. 28.↵
    Gaggin HK, Januzzi JL. Biomarkers and diagnostics in heart failure. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1832(12):2442–2450. doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2012.12.014
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med. 2007;4(10):e296. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    Lee H, Cashin AG, Lamb SE, et al. A Guideline for Reporting Mediation Analyses of Randomized Trials and Observational Studies: The AGReMA Statement. JAMA. 2021;326(11):1045–1056. doi:10.1001/jama.2021.14075
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    Edwards CV, Rao N, Bhutani D, et al. Phase 1a/b study of monoclonal antibody CAEL-101 (11-1F4) in patients with AL amyloidosis. Blood. 2021;138(25):2632–2641. doi:10.1182/blood.2020009039
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. 32.↵
    Gertz MA, Cohen AD, Comenzo RL, et al. Birtamimab plus standard of care in light chain amyloidosis: the phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled VITAL trial. Blood. Published online June 27, 2023:blood.2022019406. doi:10.1182/blood.2022019406
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. 33.↵
    Liao R, Jain M, Teller P, et al. Infusion of light chains from patients with cardiac amyloidosis causes diastolic dysfunction in isolated mouse hearts. Circulation. 2001;104(14):1594–1597.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    Shi J, Guan J, Jiang B, et al. Amyloidogenic light chains induce cardiomyocyte contractile dysfunction and apoptosis via a non-canonical p38alpha MAPK pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(9):4188–4193. doi:10.1073/pnas.0912263107
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top
Posted September 15, 2023.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email
Prognostic Value of Left Ventricular 18F-Florbetapir Uptake in Systemic Light-Chain Amyloidosis
Olivier F. Clerc, Yesh Datar, Sarah AM Cuddy, Giada Bianchi, Alexandra Taylor, Dominik C Benz, Matthew Robertson, Marie Foley Kijewski, Michael Jerosch-Herold, Raymond Y Kwong, Frederick L Ruberg, Ronglih Liao, Marcelo F Di Carli, Rodney H Falk, Sharmila Dorbala
medRxiv 2023.09.13.23295520; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.13.23295520
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area