Health-related quality of life and adherence to lifestyle recommendations in schoolchildren during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from the longitudinal cohort study Ciao Corona

Sarah R Haile, Samuel Gunz, Gabriela P Peralta, Agnė Ulytė, Alessia Raineri, Sonja Rueegg, Viktoriia Yasenok, Thomas Radtke, Milo A Puhan, Susi Kriemler
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.27.23287611

Abstract

Objectives Both lifestyle and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) were compromised during the COVID-19 pandemic. We investigated changes in adherence to physical activity and screen time recommendations of children and adolescents throughout the pandemic, and their association with HRQOL.

Methods Longitudinal data in 1769 primary (grades 1-6) and secondary (7-9) school children ages 6-17 years was taken from Ciao Corona, a school-based prospective cohort study in Zurich, Switzerland, with 5 online questionnaires between June 2020 and July 2022. HRQOL was assessed using the KINDL questionnaire. Meeting physical activity and screen time recommendations was defined by the world health organization (WHO).

Results Adherence to physical activity recommendations dropped in 2020, but returned to pre-pandemic levels by 2022. Fewer children met screen time recommendations in 2020 and 2021 than pre-pandemic. HRQOL reduced 3 points between 2020 and 2022, and was 9.7 points higher (95% CI 3.0 - 16.3) in March 2021 in children who met both recommendations.

Conclusions Adherence to WHO guidelines on physical activity and screen time during the pandemic had a consistent association with HRQOL despite longitudinal changes in behavior.

1 Introduction

Well-being in children and adolescents is known to be associated with lifestyle factors such as physical activity and screen time [1, 2].

The combination of high physical activity and low screen time has been shown to have a positive and dose-dependent association with well-being in adolescents [3]. The COVID-19 pandemic has been shown to affect children’s quality of life [4, 5, 6, 7, 8]. Further, restrictions related to the early phase of the pandemic were associated with more ST and less PA in children [4, 9, 10], as well with an adverse effect on mental health [11, 12].

Several studies have examined the association between lifestyle and mental health in children during early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic [6, 7, 13, 14, 15]. Many, however, did not include longitudinal changes, or had a small sample size. Our previous analysis of physical activity, screen time and sleep in children from four cohorts also covered only the first phase of the pandemic [15]. However, public health measures changed much since spring 2021 and after the introduction of vaccines. In Switzerland, public life went almost back to normal in 2021 even though there were still periods of high incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infections, in particular when the Omicron variant started to dominate by the end of 2021.

Here, our aim was to describe changes in adherence to physical activity and screen time in the Ciao Corona study, a longitudinal cohort of children aged 6-16 years from the canton of Zurich in Switzerland aver a two year period from June 2020 to July 2022 and to assess whether adherence to physical activity and screen time recommendations was associated with better HRQOL.

2 Methods

2.1 Study design and participants

The data for this analysis come from the school-based longitudinal cohort study Ciao Corona [16], in which 55 randomly selected schools (primary school grades 1-6 and secondary school grades 7-9, ages 6-17 years) in the canton of Zurich, the largest canton in Switzerland of approximately 1.5 million inhabitants (18% of the total Swiss population), took part. Serological testing was performed at 5 different timepoints from June 2020 to July 2022. Children (or their parents) were also asked to fill out a baseline questionnaire at the time of their first antibody test, and to complete follow-up questionnaires on a periodic basis (July 2020, January 2021, March 2021, September 2021, and July 2022).

Pandemic restrictions in Switzerland included a brief lockdown from March to May 2020 during which schools were completely remote [17], with a partial return to in-person school (e.g. with smaller classes or hybrid in person and online) until July 2020 and full in-person attendance thereafter. Despite having quite high case rates [18], schoolchildren in Switzerland remained at school with additional regional regulations which included mask wearing (primary school from Jan. 21, 2021 for 4th graders and above or Dec. 9, 2021 for 1st graders and older to Feb. 20, 2022, secondary school from Oct. 28, 2020 to Feb. 20, 2022), quarantine and isolation measures (10 day requirement until Jan. 12, 2022, then 5 day requirement until March 30, 2022) and weekly pooled testing in some, but not all schools (from August 2021 to Feb. 20, 2022). Other activities, such as extracurricular sports, continued with the use of masks, small groups, availability only to children under the age of 16, and other restrictions through March 2021. Thereafter, most activities both in and outside of school continued without restrictions for children and adolescents. The situation in Switzerland during the pandemic provides an opportunity to assess changes in lifestyle and HRQOL where preventive measures for children were relatively mild compared to other countries [19].

Ciao Corona was approved by the ethical committee of the canton of Zurich (2020-01336), and the study design has been published elsewhere [16] (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04448717). All participants provided written informed consent before being enrolled in the study. Serological results from June 2020 through December 2021 [20, 21] as well as changes in lifestyle behaviors through April 2021 [15] have been reported previously.

We had data on 1875 to 2500 children and adolescents (hereafter, children) assessed at each of 5 timepoints. In order to ensure a longitudinal cohort with repeated online questionnaires for each child, we restricted our sample to children and adolescents who had completed a baseline questionnaire in June 2020 and at least one follow-up questionnaire, so that 1769 children remained in this analysis.

2.2 Outcomes

The outcomes considered in this analysis were health-related quality of life (HRQOL), as well as self-rated health and life satisfaction. HRQOL was measured using the KINDL questionnaire [22], a validated measure of HRQOL in children comprising 24 questions on a Likert scale, which are converted to a total score from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). The KINDL questionnaire has 6 subscales: physical, emotional, self-esteem, family, friends, and school (each also on a scale from 0 to 100). For self-rated health [23], participants were asked to categorize their overall health status as excellent, good, reasonably good, or bad. For life satisfaction, participants were asked to rate their life on an 11-point scale of 0 (worst) - 10 (best) using the Cantril ladder [24]. Along with the above mentioned timepoints, children were asked about pre-pandemic levels of PA and ST, but not about previous HRQOL.

The exposures of interest were physical activity and screen time. Physical activity was assessed by asking how many hours during the week, and on weekends, participants spent on physical activity (with light sweating). The average time spent on physical activity was then computed across the entire week. If only one of those questions was answered, we assumed that this information applied to the entire week. For screen time, participants were asked how many hours per week they spend with electronic media (e.g. smartphone, tablet, computer, television, or gaming), not including media use in school. Exact wording of questions is found in the supplementary material. Continuous measures of physical activity and screen time were converted to categorical variables denoting whether they met international recommendations [25, 26]: at least 1 hr/day of physical activity, and no more than 2hr/day of screen time. A combined exposure to both behaviors was considered as a variable with 4 levels: did not meet either recommendation, met only physical activity recommendations, met only screen time recommendations, and met both physical activity and screen time recommendations.

Covariates included participants’ age and sex as collected in June 2020, as well as body mass index (BMI) Z-score at baseline [27] and presence of chronic conditions. Age was divided into two groups, those who remained in primary school during the entire timeframe (1st through 6th grades, approximately ages 6-10 years at the beginning of the pandemic period), or those who were in secondary or entered secondary school during the pandemic (ages 11-16). In the baseline questionnaires, information on parents’ nationality (at least one parent Swiss, vs both non-Swiss) and education level (at least one parent with preparatory high school or university vs apprenticeship or professional school) was collected. Children were considered overweight if their baseline body mass index (BMI) age and sex adjusted Z-score was 1 or higher. Participants were asked about diagnoses of the following chronic conditions: asthma, hay fever, diabetes, inflammatory bowel disease, ADHD, epilepsy, depression / anxiety and joint disorders. Other conditions that were included on the questionnaire but not counted as chronic conditions for this study were: celiac disease, lactose intolerance, other allergies, neurodermatitis/excema, and other diseases with a comment field. None of the participants in this analysis reported other conditions that were not already listed.

2.3 Statistical Methods

Changes in physical activity, screen time and HRQOL were examined graphically, and using tables by summarizing as n (%) or median and interquartile range (IQR). To assess the association of physical activity or screen time or both with HRQOL at each time point, we used inverse probability weighting with propensity scores which adjusted for the probability that the participant had the observed physical activity or screen time adherence status given all previous covariates (described above) and all previous lifestyle and HRQOL measurements [28]. Missing data were imputed using multiple imputation [29] prior to fitting the inverse probability weighted models (25 imputations). As a sensitivity analysis, we also considered models that were stratified by age group (primary vs secondary school). Interpretation of the model results depended on the clinical significance of any observed effect, and not on p-values.

The statistical analysis was conducted using R (R version 4.2.1) [30]. Multiple imputation was performed using the mice [31], while inverse probability weights were computed using the Weightit [32]. The models were then fit using generalized estimating equations with the geepack package [33]. Plots were created using the ggplot2 package [34].

3 Results

Among the 1769 children and adolescents included in this analysis (Table 1), 1126 (64%) remained in primary school for all of the study questionnaires, 52% were male, and 11% were overweight. 85% of participants had at least one Swiss parent, and 75% reported having at least one parent with a high level of education. 20% of participants reported having a chronic condition which potentially interferes with lifestyle or HRQOL (see Table S1).

View this table:
Table 1:

Baseline characteristics. Lifestyle and health-related quality of life analysis of Ciao Corona, Switzerland, 2020 - 2022. Primary school includes grades 1-6, while secondary school is grades 7-9. Chronic conditions included hay fever (14%), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD, 4%), asthma (4%), depression (0.3%), epilepsy (0.2%), joint disorders (0.2%), diabetes (0.1%) and inflammatory bowel disease (<0.1%) (Table S1).

Participants in secondary school generally had less physical activity and more screen time than those in primary school (Figure 1), especially during the lockdown period, and greater differences in screen time than in physical activity were observed between the age groups. In the early phases of the pandemic, participants were less physically active and had more screen time than pre-pandemic. By early 2021, screen time had decreased back to almost pre-pandemic levels, but has slightly increased again since then. The percentage of children meeting physical activity recommendations remained low through early 2021, but then increased and remained at pre-pandemic levels.

Figure 1:
Figure 1:

Adherence to physical activity and screen time recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic, by age group. Point size corresponds to the number of observations. Ciao Corona, Switzerland, 2020 - 2022.

HRQOL, as measured by KINDL total score, was similar across all timepoints (median 77, IQR 71 - 84), but highly variable across the sample (range 17 to 100), and reduced approximately 3 points between July 2020 and July 2022. Children not meeting either physical activity or screen time recommendations had on average lower HRQOL outcomes than those meeting physical activity or screen time or both recommendations (Figure 2, Table S2). This pattern was consistent across all follow-up questionnaires.

Figure 2:
Figure 2:

Health-related quality of life over time, by adherence to physical activity and screen time recommendations. Adherence to recommendations had the reference category of not adhering to either recommendation (“neither”), compared to only adhering to physical activity recommendations (“only PA”), only adhering to screen time recommendations (“only ST”) and adhering to both recommendations (“PA+ST”). Ciao Corona, Switzerland, 2020 - 2022.

Participants meeting both physical activity and screen time recommendations had 2.4 (July 2022, 95% CI -1.3 to 6.1) to 9.4 (March 2021, 3.0 to 16.3) points higher total KINDL scores than those not meeting either of the recommendations (Figure 3, Table S3). Children meeting screen time but not physical activity recommendations had 0.5 (July 2022, 95% CI -3.4 to 4.4) to 8.1 (March 2021, 1.1 - 15.2) points higher KINDL scores than those who did not meet either recommendation, while those meeting physical activity but not screen time recommendations had 1.7 (July 2022, -2.3 to 5.6) to 6.2 (March 2021, -0.5 to 12.9) point higher KINDL scores. The magnitude of the observed differences due to meeting both physical activity and screen time recommendations compared to meeting neither of the recommendations increased from June 2020 (4.6 points, 95% CI 2.8 - 6.5) to March 2021 (9.7, 3.0 to 16.3), after which the association decreased to 2.4 (−1.3 to 6.1) points. A similar pattern was seen in each of the KINDL subscales (Figure S5, Tables S4 and S5), life satisfaction and self-rated health (Figure S6 and Table S5). We also observed similar patterns in an age-stratified analysis, but do not present those results due to the relatively small sample size (Table S7).

Figure 3:
Figure 3:

Adjusted association between health-related quality of life and adherence to physical activity (PA) and screen time (ST) recommendations, fit using inverse probability weighted models and adjusting for past covariates (age, sex, nationality, parents’ education, presence of chronic conditions, and body mass index) and previous adherence to recommendations. Adherence to recommendations had the reference category of not adhering to either recommendation, compared to only adhering to physical activity recommendations (“only PA”), only adhering to screen time recommendations (“only ST”) and adhering to both recommendations (“PA+ST”). Ciao Corona, Switzerland, 2020 - 2022.

4 Discussion

In this longitudinal cohort study, we observed that fewer children met physical activity and screen time recommendations during a short lockdown and through early 2021 than in the time periods before or after. Primary school children were much more likely to meet physical activity and screen time recommendations, especially during the lockdown. HRQOL, as measured by total KINDL score, appeared relatively constant among children in both age groups during the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, even though variability among the tested children and adolescents was high, as seen in Figure 2. Children meeting both physical activity and screen time recommendations had on average the highest HRQOL scores, followed by those only meeting screen time recommendations, those only meeting physical activity recommendations and then those not meeting either recommendation. After adjusting for past lifestyle behaviors, there was a statistically significant difference (ranging from 4.6 points in July 2020 to 9.7 points in March 2021, Table S3) in HRQOL between children meeting and not meeting physical activity and screen time recommendations. This association was consistent despite overall high variability in HRQOL. Nevertheless, the temporal evolution of the association between lifestyle and HRQOL showed a peak in spring 2021 and then reduced in summer 2022.

Adherence or non-adherence to physical activity and screen time recommendations was associated in our study with a difference of between 0.5 and 9.7 points on the 100-point KINDL HRQOL scale, with 50% of the effects between 2.3 and 5.3 (Figure 3, Table S2). While many features of KINDL have been discussed previously, no minimal important difference has been reported [35, 36]. We searched the literature for comparisons of HRQOL in healthy children compared to children with chronic conditions to explore the range of differences observed. A comparison of children with and without asthma indicated a difference of about 4.8 points [37], while children with headaches had a 3.5 point lower KINDL total score than those without headaches [38]. Other studies have shown differences of 0.8 points in overweight children, 2-4 points in children with hemophilia, and 9 points in children with various chronic conditions when compared to children without such conditions [39, 40, 41]. These results indicate that a difference of 2-5 points as observed in this study are likely to be relevant in practice.

The results from our study are in line with the literature. A number of studies have shown reduced physical activity during the COVID-19 pandemic [42, 43], as well as prolonged screen time [9, 11]. We observed a consistent and increasing association between HRQOL and lifestyle through March 2021, which then diminished to a weak association by mid-2022, similar to that seen pre-pandemic [1, 44, 45, 46, 13]. A 2021 review noted that increased satisfaction was associated with higher physical activity and lower screen time [3], while a 2020 cross-sectional survey observed that children with higher physical activity and lower screen time had fewer difficulties and mental health symptoms [44]. The strong association observed in March 2021 may be due to various factors, including possible seasonal variation [47, 48]. More likely however is that the end of multiple pandemic restrictions which occurred in March 2021 [17] (Figure S4) led to changes in participants’ behaviors and HRQOL (or perhaps perception of their HRQOL). It may be that more physical activity and screen time explained more of the variance in HRQOL at that time in the context of the pandemic, or that lifestyle played a larger role in determining HRQOL when many other factors were out of children’s control due to pandemic measures. Due to the specific mix and severity of pandemic measures in Switzerland, our results may not necessarily be generalizable to other countries or populations. Additionally, the association between HRQOL and lifestyle may have been stronger in countries with stronger pandemic restrictions which included longer school closures, or in populations with fewer socio-economic resources.

Some implications for public health and further research can be inferred from these results. First, measures to increase physical activity and reduce screen time in children and adolescents, both alone and in combination, are important for both physical health and HRQOL. Public health measures to improve health and well-being in children and adolescents should therefore aim to affect both lifestyle and HRQOL. While we examined the relationship to adherence to WHO guidelines for physical activity and screen time, it may well be that a dose-response relationship exists where more physical activity and less screen time leads to higher HRQOL even if recommendations are not met. Dose-dependent relationships in adolescents were explored previously [3], but could be the topic of further research in children 10 years old and younger. Second, high variability in HRQOL across our sample indicates that other factors besides lifestyle are likely to play a role in individual HRQOL. Studies exploring possible determinants of HRQOL in children and adolescents could therefore be of use in adapting measures to increase physical activity and reduce screen time, as well as in identifying individuals that may need additional support in these areas.

The main strength of this study is the use of a large longitudinal sample of children and adolescents assessed repeatedly at five different times across 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic. Physical activity and screen time as key lifestyle factors were included as exposure variables, and we were able to adjust for a large set of relevant confounders (age, sex, BMI, chronic conditions, nationality, parents’ education and school unit). The use of inverse probability weighting allowed to estimate a causal effect of physical activity and screen time on HRQOL while adjusting for past confounders and past lifestyle. Limitations of this study include lack of HRQOL data prior to the pandemic, and recall bias as HRQOL, physical activity and screen time were all assessed subjectively using questionnaires. Despite the lack of objective measurement of physical activity, we observed typical differences in physical levels between children and adolescents. Recall bias should however not affect the strength of the association. It is possible that physical activity, screen time and HRQOL had seasonal changes which we cannot account for. Differential loss to follow-up was likely as children who changed schools or classes, or who went to college preparatory secondary school (“Gymnasium”) during the study period could not continue to participate. As with many studies, this sample has more highly educated parents and is more likely to have Swiss nationality than the target population of all schoolchildren in the canton of Zurich. We have assumed that physical activity and screen time influence HRQOL, but it could instead be that HRQOL influences physical activity and screen time, or that all have common causes.

In conclusion, changes in physical activity and screen time during the COVID-19 pandemic only temporarily translated to substantial changes in HRQOL, and were minimal by June 2022. Yet, meeting physical activity and / or screen time recommendations was consistently associated with statistically significant differences in HRQOL, and the magnitude of those differences likely exceed the minimal important difference. The high variability in HRQOL implies that physical activity and screen time are not the sole driving factors of HRQOL in children, and other factors must also play a role.

Data Availability

Upon study completion in 2023, de-identified and potentially aggregated participant data, together with required data dictionaries, will be available on reasonable request by email to the corresponding author. The purpose and methods of data analysis will be evaluated by the study team first to ensure that it complies with the ethics approval.

Author Contributions

SK and MAP initiated the project and preliminary design. SK, TR, SRH developed the study question and methodology. SK, TR, AU, AR and SR recruited study participants, collected, and managed the data. SG supported the organisation and data collection at schools for the last testing round (July 2022). GPP, SG and SRH organized and cleaned the data for the analysis of lifestyle and HRQOL. SRH performed statistical analysis and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. VY performed a review of the literature. All authors contributed to the development of the study question and interpretation of its results and revised and approved the manuscript for intellectual content. SK, SR, AR and SRH had access to and verified all underlying data. The corresponding author SK attests that all listed authors meet authorship criteria and that no others meeting the criteria have been omitted.

Ethical Approval

The study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the canton of Zurich (2020-01336), Switzerland. Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardian.

Financial Disclosure

This study is part of Corona Immunitas research network, co-ordinated by the Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), and funded by fundraising of SSPH+ that includes funds of the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health and private funders (ethical guidelines for funding stated by SSPH+ will be respected), by funds of the Cantons of Switzerland (Vaud, Zurich, and Basel) and by institutional funds of the Universities. Additional funding, specific to this study, was available from the University of Zurich Foundation.

Competing Interests

All authors have completed and submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. GPP was the recipient of the Long-Term Research Fellowship 2020 from the European Respiratory Society and received a conference fee from Menarini. For the other authors, no potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Data sharing statement

Upon study completion in 2023, de-identified and potentially aggregated participant data, together with required data dictionaries, will be available on reasonable request by email to the corresponding author. The purpose and methods of data analysis will be evaluated by the study team first to ensure that it complies with the ethics approval.

Acknowledgments

We thank Miquel Serra-Buriel for consulting on the statistical methods, and Jan Schlegel for summarizing the pandemic measures.

References

  1. [1].↵
    M Rodriguez-Ayllon, C Cadenas-Sanchez, F Estevez-Lopez, NE Muñoz, J Mora- Gonzalez, JH Migueles, P Molina-Garcia, H Henriksson, A Mena-Molina, V Martinez- Vizcaino, A Catena, M Löf, KI Erickson, DR Lubas, FB Ortega, and I Esteban-Cornejo. Role of physical activity and sedentary behavior in the mental health of preschoolers, children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 49(9):1383–1410, 2019. doi:10.1007/s40279-019-01099-5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. [2].↵
    S Villafaina, M A Tapia-Serrano, Mikel Vaquero-Solís, Juan Luis León-Llamas, and Pedro Antonio Sánchez-Miguel. The role of physical activity in the relationship between satisfaction with life and health-related quality of life in school-age adolescents. Behavioral Sciences, 11(9), 2021. doi:10.3390/bs11090121.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. [3].↵
    A Khan, E-Y Lee, S Rosenbaum, SR Khan, and MS Tremblay. Dose-dependent and joint associations between screen time, physical activity, and mental wellbeing in adolescents: an international observational study. Lancet Child and Adolescent Health, 5(10):729–738, 2021. doi:10.1016/S2352-4642(21)00200-5.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. [4].↵
    Sheri Madigan, Rachel Eirich, Paolo Pador, Brae Anne McArthur, and Ross D. Neville. Assessment of Changes in Child and Adolescent Screen Time During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics, 176(12):1188–1198, 12 2022. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.4116.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. [5].↵
    H Nobari, M Fashi, A Eskandari, S Villafaina, A Murillo-Garcia, and J Perez-Gomez. Effect of COVID-19 on health-related quality of life in adolescents and children: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(9):4563, 2021. doi:10.3390/ijerph18094563.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. [6].↵
    V Richard, R Dumont, E Lorthe, A Loizeau, H Baysson, M-E Zaballa, F Pennacchio, RP Barbe, KM Posfay-Barbe, I Guessous, S Stringhini, and the SEROCoV-KIDS Study Group. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on children and adolescents: determinants and association with quality of life and mental health—a cross-sectional study. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 17(17), 2023. doi: 10.1186/s13034-023-00563-5.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. [7].↵
    Bettina Bringolf-Isler, Johanna Hänggi, Bengt Kayser, L. Suzanne Suggs, Alain Dösseg-ger, and Nicole Probst-Hensch. Covid-19 pandemic and health related quality of life in primary school children in switzerland: a repeated cross-sectional study. Swiss Medical Weekly, 151(4546):w30071, Nov. 2021. doi:10.4414/SMW.2021.w30071.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. [8].↵
    Y Barrense-Dias, L Chok, and J C Suris Granell. A picture of the mental health of adolescents in Switzerland and Liechtenstein. Technical Report 323, Centre universitaire de médecine générale et santé publique (Unisanté), 2021. doi:10.16908/issn.1660-7104/323.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. [9].↵
    M Kharel, JL Sakamoto, RR Carandang, S Ulambayar, A Shibanuma, E Yarotskaya, M Basargina, and M Jimba. Impact of covid-19 pandemic lockdown on movement behaviours of children and adolescents: a systematic review. BMJ Global Health, 7:e007190, 2022. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007190.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. [10].↵
    Hung-Kwan So, Gilbert T. Chua, Ka-Man Yip, Keith T. S. Tung, Rosa S. Wong, Lobo H. T. Louie, Winnie W. Y. Tso, Ian C. K. Wong, Jason C. Yam, Mike Y. W. Kwan, Kui-Kai Lau, Judy K. W. Kong, Wilfred H. S. Wong, and Patrick Ip. Impact of covid-19 pandemic on school-aged children’s physical activity, screen time, and sleep in hong kong: A cross-sectional repeated measures study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(17):10539, Aug 2022. doi:10.3390/ijerph191710539.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. [11].↵
    L Marciano, M Ostroumova, PJ Schulz, and A-L Camerini. Digital media use and adolescents’ mental health during the Covid-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Public Health, 9(793868), 2022. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.793868.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. [12].↵
    B Pfefferbaum and RL Van Horn. Physical activity and sedentary behavior in children during the COVID-19 pandemic: Implications for mental health. Current Psychiatry Reports, 24:493–501, 2022. doi:10.1007/s11920-022-01366-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. [13].↵
    Kathrin Wunsch, Carina Nigg, Claudia Niessner, Steffen C. E. Schmidt, Doris Ori- wol, Anke Hanssen-Doose, Alexander Burchartz, Ana Eichsteller, Simon Kolb, Annette Worth, and Alexander Woll. The impact of covid-19 on the interrelation of physical activity, screen time and health-related quality of life in children and adolescents in Germany: Results of the Motorik-Modul study. Children, 8(2):98, Feb 2021. doi:10.3390/children8020098.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. [14].↵
    Justine Hussong, Eva Möhler, Anna Kühn, Markus Wenning, Thomas Gehrke, Holger Burckhart, Ulf Richter, Alexandra Nonnenmacher, Michael Zemlin, Thomas Lücke, Folke Brinkmann, Tobias Rothoeft, and Thorsten Lehr. Mental health and health-related quality of life in german adolescents after the third wave of the covid-19 pandemic. Children, 9(6):780, May 2022. doi:10.3390/children9060780.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. [15].↵
    G P Peralta, A-L Camerini, Sarah R Haile, C R Kahler, E Lorthe, L Marciano, A Nuss-baumer, T Radtke, A Ulytė, M A Puhan, and S Kriemlier. Lifestyle behaviours of children and adolescents during the first two waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in Switzerland and their relation to well-being: An observational study. International Journal of Public Health, 67:1604978, 2022. doi:10.3389/ijph.2022.1604978.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. [16].↵
    A Ulytė, T Radtke, I A Abela, S R Haile, J Braun, R Jung, C Berger, A Trkola, J Fehr, M A Puhan, and S Kriemler. Seroprevalence and immunity of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children and adolescents in schools in Switzerland: design for a longitudinal, school-based prospective cohort study. International Journal of Public Health, 65:1549–1557, 2020. doi:10.1007/s00038-020-01495-z.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. [17].↵
    Federal Office of Public Health. Coronavirus: Measures and ordinances. URL: https://www.bag.admin.ch/bag/en/home/krankheiten/ausbrueche-epidemien-pandemien/aktuelle-ausbrueche-epidemien/novel-cov/massnahmen-des-bundes.html#757183649.
  18. [18].↵
    Our World in Data. Explore the global data on confirmed COVID-19 cases. URL: https://ourworldindata.org/covid-cases.
  19. [19].↵
  20. [20].↵
    Agnė Ulytė, Thomas Radtke, Irene A Abela, Sarah R Haile, Christoph Berger, Michael Huber, Merle Schanz, Magdalena Schwarzmueller, Alexandra Trkola, Jan Fehr, Milo A Puhan, and Susi Kriemler. Clustering and longitudinal change in sars-cov-2 seroprevalence in school children in the canton of zurich, switzerland: prospective cohort study of 55 schools. BMJ, 372, 2021. doi:10.1136/bmj.n616.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. [21].↵
    S R Haile, A Raineri, S Rueegg, T Radtke, A Ulytė, M A Puhan, and S Kriemler. Heterogeneous evolution of SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in school-age children: Results from the school-based cohort study Ciao Corona in November-December 2021 in the canton of Zurich. Swiss Medical Weekly, 153(1):40035, January 2023. doi:10.57187/smw.2023.40035.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. [22].↵
    U Ravens-Sieber, M Erhart, N Wille, and M Bullinger. Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents in Germany: results of the BELLA study. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 17(1):148–151, 2008. doi:10.1007/s00787-008-1016-x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. [23].↵
    E L Idler and Y Benyamini. Self-rated health and mortality: A review of twentyseven community studies. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 38(1):21–37, March 1997. doi:10.2307/2955359.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. [24].↵
    Joanna Mazur, Monika Szkultecka-Deębek, Anna Dzielska, Mariola Drozd, and Agnieszka Malkowska-Szkutnik. What does the Cantril ladder measure in adolescence? Archives of Medical Science, 14(1):182–189, 2018. doi:10.5114/aoms.2016.60718.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. [25].↵
    WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Technical report, World Health Organization, 2020. URL: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/336656/9789240015128-eng.pdf.
  26. [26].↵
    Fiona C Bull, Salih S Al-Ansari, Stuart Biddle, Katja Borodulin, Matthew P Bu- man, Greet Cardon, Catherine Carty, Jean-Philippe Chaput, Sebastien Chastin, Roger Chou, Paddy C Dempsey, Loretta DiPietro, Ulf Ekelund, Joseph Firth, Christine M Friedenreich, Leandro Garcia, Muthoni Gichu, Russell Jago, Peter T Katzmarzyk, Estelle Lambert, Michael Leitzmann, Karen Milton, Francisco B Ortega, Chathuranga Ranasinghe, Emmanuel Stamatakis, Anne Tiedemann, Richard P Troiano, Hidde P van der Ploeg, Vicky Wari, and Juana F Willumsen. World health organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. 54(24):1451–1462, 2020. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. [27].↵
    U Eiholzer, C Fritz, C Katschnig, R Dinkelmann, and A Stephan. Contemporary height, weight and body mass index references for children aged 0 to adulthood in Switzerland compared to the Prader reference, WHO and neighbouring countries. Annals of Human Biology, 46(6):437–447, 2019. doi:10.1080/03014460.2019.1677774.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. [28].↵
    Daniel F. McCaffrey, Beth Ann Griffin, Daniel Almirall, Mary Ellen Slaughter, Rajeev Ramchand, and Lane F. Burgette. A tutorial on propensity score estimation for multiple treatments using generalized boosted models. Statistics in Medicine, 32(19):3388–3414, 2013. arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/sim.5753, doi:10.1002/sim.5753.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. [29].↵
    Jonathan A C Sterne, Ian R White, John B Carlin, Michael Spratt, Patrick Royston, Michael G Kenward, Angela M Wood, and James R Carpenter. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. BMJ, 338, 2009. doi:10.1136/bmj.b2393.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  30. [30].↵
    R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2022. URL: https://www.R-project.org/.
  31. [31].↵
    Stef van Buuren and Karin Groothuis-Oudshoorn. mice: Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(3):1–67, 2011. doi:10.18637/jss.v045.i03.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. [32].↵
    Noah Greifer. WeightIt: Weighting for Covariate Balance in Observational Studies, 2022. R package version 0.13.1. URL: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Weightit.
  33. [33].↵
    Ulrich Halekoh, Søren Højsgaard, and Jun Yan. The R package geepack for generalized estimating equations. Journal of Statistical Software, 15/2:1–11, 2006.
    OpenUrl
  34. [34].↵
    Hadley Wickham. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag New York, 2016. URL: https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org.
  35. [35].↵
    U Ravens-Sieberer, M Erhart, N Wille, M Bullinger, and the BELLA study group. Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents in Germany: results of the BELLA study. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 17:148–156, 2008. doi: 10.1007/s00787-008-1016-x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. [36].↵
    Holger J Schünemann and Gordon H Guyatt. Commentary—goodbye M(C)ID! Hello MID, where do you come from? Health Services Research, 40(2):593–597, 2005. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00374.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. [37].↵
    N Kojima, Y Ohya, M Futamura, M Akashi, H Odajima, Y Adachi, F Kobayashi, and A Akasawa. Exercise-induced asthma is associated with impaired quality of life among children with asthma in Japan. Allergology International, 58(2):187–192, 2009. doi:10.2332/allergolint.08-0A-0034.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  38. [38].↵
    A Milde-Busch, S Heinrich, S Thomas, A Kühnlein, K Radon, A Straube, O Bayer, and R von Kries. Quality of life in adolescents with headache: Results from a population-based survey. Cephalalgia, 30(6):713–721, 2010. doi:10.1177/0333102409354389.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. [39].↵
    N Wille, M Erhart, C Petersen, and U Ravens-Sieber. The impact of overweight and obesity on health-related quality of life in childhood –results from an intervention study. BMC Public Health, 8(421), 2008. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-8-421.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. [40].↵
    M Bullinger and S von Mackensen. Quality of life in children and families with bleeding disorders. Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, 25:S64–S67, 2003.
    OpenUrl
  41. [41].↵
    K M Kenzik, S Y Tull, D A Revicki, E A Shenkman, and I Huang and. Comparison of 4 pediatric health-related quality-of-life instruments: A study on a medicaid population. Medical Decision Making, 34(5):590–602, 2014. doi:10.1177/0272989X14529846.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. [42].↵
    RD Neville, KD Lakes, WG Hopkins, G Tarantino, CE Draper, R Beck, and S Madigan. Global changes in child and adolescent physical activity during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics, 176(9):886–94, 2022. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.2313.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  43. [43].↵
    VA Kovacs, M Brandes, T Suesse, R Blagus, S Whiting, K Wickramasinghe, and AD Okely. Are we underestimating the impact of COVID-19 on children’s physical activity in Europe?—a study of 24 302 children. European Journal of Public Health, 32(3):494–6, 2022. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckac003.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  44. [44].↵
    J-P Chaput, J Willumsen, F Bull, R Chou, U Ekelund, J Firth, R Jago, F B Or-tega, and P T Katzmarzyk. 2020 who guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behavior for children and adolescents aged 5-17 years: summary of the evidence. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 17(141), 2020. doi:10.1186/s12966-020-01037-z.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  45. [45].↵
    J E Donnelly, C H Hillman, D Castelli, J L Etnier, S Lee, P Tomporowski, K Lam-bourne, and A N Szabo-Reed. Physical activity, fitness, cognitive function, and academic achievement in children: A systematic review. Medicine & Science in Sport and Exercise, 48(6):1197–1222, June 2016. doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000000901.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. [46].↵
    D Lubans, J Richards, C Hillman, G Faulkner, M Beauchamp, M Nilsson, P Kelly, J Smith, L Raine, and S Biddle. Physical activity for cognitive and mental health in youth: A systematic review of mechanisms. Pediatrics, 138(3):e20161642, 2016. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-1642.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. [47].↵
    V Carson and J C Spence. Seasonal variation in physical activity among children and adolescents: A review. Pediatric Exercise Science, 22:81–92, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  48. [48].↵
    H Jia and E I Lubetkin. Time trends and seasonal patterns of health-related quality of life among U.S. adults. Public Health Reports, 124(5):692–701, 2009. doi:10.1177/003335490912400511.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
Back to top
Posted March 29, 2023.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email
Health-related quality of life and adherence to lifestyle recommendations in schoolchildren during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from the longitudinal cohort study Ciao Corona
Sarah R Haile, Samuel Gunz, Gabriela P Peralta, Agnė Ulytė, Alessia Raineri, Sonja Rueegg, Viktoriia Yasenok, Thomas Radtke, Milo A Puhan, Susi Kriemler
medRxiv 2023.03.27.23287611; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.27.23287611
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area